Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anonymous Participation and Collaboration Efficiency in Online Communities

  • Hong Joo Lee (Department of Business Administration, Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jong Woo Kim (School of Business, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hyun Jung Park (Management Research Center, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Sung Joo Park (Information Systems, KAIST Graduate School of Management)
  • Received : 2019.07.19
  • Accepted : 2020.04.13
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Anonymity is one of the key factors that influence communication and the work behaviours of people. It is even more evident in an online community where the role of anonymity can be akin to a double-edged sword: it can increase participation while at the same time having detrimental effects due to irresponsible and disruptive behaviour. Most studies on anonymous participation in groups or communities have reported this ambivalent view of anonymity: positive or negative. Furthermore, the effects of anonymous participation may be different in a dynamic sense because the task characteristics of participation can vary across time. In this study, we hypothesise that the effects of anonymity in online collaboration differ across the stages of collaboration. We analysed 2,978 featured articles on the English-language Wikipedia website and investigated the contributions of anonymous participants. While the contributions of anonymous participants were negative to collaboration efficiency as a whole, the negative effect of anonymous participants was stronger in the earlier stage than the later stage of collaboration. These findings indicate that the effect of anonymity has two sides in terms of collaboration efficiency in the same collaborative environment.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A3A2066740) and Hong Joo Lee was supported by the Research Fund, 2018 of The Catholic University of Korea.

References

  1. Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., and Williamson, T. (2009). Reputation and reliability in collective goods. Rationality and Society, 21(3), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463109336804
  2. Arazy, O., Nov, O., Patterson, R., and Yeo, L. (2011). Information quality in Wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 71-98. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270403
  3. Balazs, A. L. (1990). Value congruency: The case of the 'socially responsible' firm. Journal of Business Research, 20(2), 171-181.
  4. Bales, R. F., and Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(4), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059886
  5. Ball, P. (2007, February 27). The more, the wikier. Nature News, Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/2007/070226/full/news070226-6.html (Accessed 18 October 2017).
  6. Braaten, L. J. (1974). Developmental phases of encounter groups and related intensive groups. Interpersonal Development, 5(2), 112-129.
  7. Brown, S. L., and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
  8. Carr, N. G. (2007). The ignorance of crowds. Strategy +Business (Issue 47), Available at: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/07204?gko=6c4ad (Accessed 18 October 2017)
  9. Di Gangi, P. M., Wasko, M. M., and Hooker, R. E. (2010). Getting customers' ideas to work for you: Learning from dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 213-228.
  10. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224-1239. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0614
  11. Gallaugher, J., and Ransbotham, S. (2010). Social media and customer dialog management at Starbucks. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 197-212.
  12. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/256496
  13. Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10-36. https://doi.org/10.2307/258605
  14. Hayne, S. C., Pollard, C. E., and Rice, R. E. (2003). Identification of comment authorship in anonymous group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 301-329.
  15. Jessup, L. M., and Tansik, D. A. (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00346.x
  16. Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., and Tansik, D. A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work the deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496490213003
  17. Kane, G. C. (2011). A multimethod study of information quality in wiki collaboration. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(1), 4.
  18. Kane, G. C., Majchrzak, A., and Johnson, J. (2009). A longitudinal model of perspective making and perspective taking within fluid online collectives. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems 2009, Phoenix, AZ.
  19. Kelley, J. B., and Alden, D. L. (2016). Online brand community: Through the eyes of self-determination theory. Internet Research, 26(4), 790-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2015-0017
  20. Lacoursiere, R. (1974). A group method to facilitate learning during the stages of a psychiatric affiliation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 24(3), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.1974.11491836
  21. Malone, T. W., and Klein, M. (2007). Harnessing collective intelligence to address global climate change. Innovations, 2(3), 15-26.
  22. Marx, G. T. (1999). What's in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society, 15(2), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128565
  23. Nunamaker Jr, J. F., and Dennis, A. R. (1991). Information technology for negotiating groups: Generating options for mutual gain. Management Science, 37(10), 1325-1346.
  24. O'Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166580
  25. Park, H. J., and Park, S. J. (2016). Communication behavior and online knowledge collaboration: Evidence from Wikipedia. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(4), 769-792. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2015-0312
  26. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer, New York, NY.
  27. Rains, S. A. (2007). The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34(1), 100-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206296084
  28. Ransbotham, S., and Kane, G. C. (2011). Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 613-627. https://doi.org/10.2307/23042799
  29. Ransbotham, S., Kane, G. C., and Lurie, N. H. (2012). Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Science, 31(3), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0684
  30. Rao, V. S., and Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1991). Computer support of groups: Theory-based models for GDSS research. Management Science, 37(10), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.10.1347
  31. Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA.
  32. Scott, C. R. (2004). Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations. Free Speech Yearbook, 41(1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997225.2004.10556309
  33. Scott, J. C. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools and societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  34. Seeger, J. A. (1983). No innate phases in group problem solving. Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 683-689. https://doi.org/10.2307/258269
  35. Seigenthaler, J. (2005, November 29). A false Wikipedia biography. USA Today, Available at http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm (Accessed 18 October 2017)
  36. Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927795
  37. Sia, C. L., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K. K. (2002). Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.70.92
  38. Spears, R., and Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London, UK.
  39. Tanis, M., and Postmes, T. (2007). Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 955-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.004
  40. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022100
  41. Tuckman, B. W., and Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404
  42. Wilkinson, D. M., and Huberman, B. A. (2007). Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12(4). Available at http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1763/1643 (Accessed 18 October 2017)
  43. Wohner, T., Kohler, S., and Peters, R. (2011). Automatic reputation assessment in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems 2011 in Shanghai, China.