한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.41-68
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

담론적 역량 개발을 위한 교사교육 프로그램에서 예비수학교사의 인식 분석

An Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers' Cognition in Curriculum for Developing their Discursive Competency

  • Kim, Dong-Joong (Department of Mathematics Education, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Sang-Ho (Department of Mathematics Education, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Hui (Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Korea University Graduate School)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.30
  • 심사 : 2020.04.20
  • 발행 : 2020.05.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 담론적 역량 개발을 위한 교사교육 프로그램을 경험한 예비교사의 수업 계획과 수업 실행 간 관계 및 수업 과정에서 요구되는 담론적 역량에 대한 인식을 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위해 예비수학교사 15명을 대상으로 담론적 역량 개발을 위한 [수학교수론]을 경험하게 하고, 직접 수업을 실행하고 담론을 분석하는 과정을 포함한 파이널 프로젝트를 연구 자료로 수집·분석하였다. 분석 결과, 예비교사들은 예상치 못한 교수·학습 상황을 경험함으로써 수업 계획과 수업 실행 간 차이를 인식하였으며, 프로그램을 통해 학습한 담론적 역량의 중요성을 인식하고 자신의 수업과 연결시켜 반성하는 것을 볼 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 지식과 실행을 통합하는 교수법 개발에 도움을 줄 수 있는 담론적 역량의 존재가능성과 이를 함양해야 하는 중요성과 필요성을 수학교사가 인식하는 데 기여했다고 볼 수 있으며, 향후 담론적 역량 개발을 위한 교사교육 프로그램에 관한 실질적인 아이디어를 제공하였다고 볼 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the cognition of per-service teachers, who experienced a teacher education process for developing their discursive competency, about relations between class plan and class practice as well as discursive competency required in class process. For this purpose, 15 pre-service teachers participated in the course of mathematics teaching theory for developing discursive competency and their final projects including the process of analysing their own teaching discourse after actually teaching middle or high school students were collected as data and analyzed. Results show that they realized that there were differences between class plan and class practice after having experienced unexpected teaching and learning situations, recognized the importance of discursive competency learned from the course, and reflected on their discursive competency in conjunction with their classes. These results imply that the course contributed to pre-service teachers' cognitions of the existential possibility of discursive competency. which helps to develop a teaching method combining teachers' knowledge and practice, the importance of discursive competency, and the need for developing it. The course also provided practical ideas about a teacher education program to develop prospective teachers' discursive competency

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kwak, J., & Ryu, H. (2008). Comparative analysis of the PCK of teachers on plane figure and their educational practice, School Mathematics, 10(3), 423-441.
  2. Ministry of Education (2015), Researchers in the Curriculum Development Policy for the 2015 Revised Curriculum 3rd Workshop book, Ministry of Education.
  3. Kim, D.-J., Shin, J., Lee, J., Lim, W., Lee, Y., & Choi, S. (2019). Conceptualizing discursive teaching capacity: A case study of a middle school mathematics teacher, School Mathematics, 21(2), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.06.21.2.291
  4. Kim, M. J. (2012). A comparative analysis of Teacher's PCK(Pedagogical Content Knowledge) on similar figures and classroom practices, Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  5. Kim, B., & Ryu, S. (2011). An analysis of the PCK of teachers and their educational practice about division of decimals, Journal of elementary mathematics education in Korea, 15(3), 533-557.
  6. Kim, B., & Ryu, S. (2011). Comparative analysis of teachers' PCK and their educational practice about fraction, School Mathematics, 13(4), 675-696.
  7. Kim, S. K. (2015). Research on the relationship between the quality of mathematics classes and pedagogical content knowledge revealed in classes, Doctorate thesis, Kyungpook National University.
  8. Pang, J. (2001). An analysis of factors affecting teaching methods of a mathematics teacher. Communications of Mathematical Education, 12, 331-347.
  9. An, S., & Pang, J. (2006). An analysis of the relationship between teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and teaching practice: Focusing on the area of plane figure, Journal of educational research in mathematics, 16(1), 25-41.
  10. Jung, J. W. (2015). Analysis on the inconsistency between pre-service secondary science teachers' lesson plans and their teaching practices, Master's thesis, Dankook University.
  11. Jin, S. M. (2012). Analysis on mathematical communication and questioning types in the videos of excellent classes of middle schools, Master's thesis, Korea National University of education.
  12. Choi, S. H. (2018). Mathematics teachers' discursive competency -Based on the formation process of social norm and sociomathematical norm-, Doctorate thesis, Korea University.
  13. Choi, S., Ha, J., & Kim, D.-J. (2016). A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method, Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.3.375
  14. Choi, S., & Kim, D.-J. (2017). Effects of a communicational approach to teacher education on cognitive changes in mathematical beliefs, Korean journal of teacher education, 33(4), 25-50.
  15. Choi, S., & Kim, D.-J. (2019). A mathematics teacher's discursive competence on the basis of mathematical competencies, Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(3), 377-394.
  16. Cheo, S., & Hwang, H. (2008). The research on pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics teaching, Journal of the Korean school mathematics society, 11(4), 569-593.
  17. Choi, Y., Choi, S., & Kim, D.-J. (2014). An investigation of beginning and experienced teachers' PCK and teaching practices -Middle school functions-, Journal of the Korean school mathematics society, 17(2), 251-274.
  18. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  19. Cochran, K. L., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487193044004004
  20. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception, Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100302
  21. Merriam, S. B. (2010). 정성연구방법론과 사례연구, (강윤수, 고상숙, 권오남, 류희찬, 박만구, 방정숙, 이중권, 정인철, 황우형 역). 서울: 교우사. (영어초판은 1988년 출판).
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  23. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176193
  24. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching, Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  26. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The journal of the learning sciences, 3(2), 115-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
  27. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussion. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  28. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in mathematics(TEDS-M): Policy, practice and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics, East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, M. A.: MIT Press.
  30. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2003). Philosophical investigations: The German text, with a revised English translation(3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  31. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27(4), 458-477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
  32. Young, A. C., Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1998). Do superior teachers employ systematic instructional planning procedures? A descriptive study. Educational technology research & development, 46(2), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299789

피인용 문헌

  1. 수학적 주목하기에 관한 예비 중등교사들 간의 차이 발생 요인 분석 및 실천적 지식 함양 방안 vol.24, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2021.24.1.007