DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis for Gender-Role Stereotyping of Illustrations in Elementary Science Paper Textbooks and Digital Textbooks Developed under 2015 Revised National Curriculum

2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학과 서책형교과서와 디지털교과서의 삽화에 나타난 성역할 고정관념 실태 분석

  • Received : 2019.11.29
  • Accepted : 2020.02.03
  • Published : 2020.02.29

Abstract

This study analyzed the illustrations presented in the elementary science paper textbooks and digital textbooks under the 2015 revised curriculum in terms of gender role stereotypes. The frequency of pupils and adults on illustrations was counted by gender, and the types of activities and behavior of characters were analyzed. For pupils, paper textbooks showed a higher frequency of girls than boys, and digital textbooks showed similar gender rates. In the aspect of the activity, paper textbooks showed similar gender rates in non-learning activities, but more girls in learning activities. In digital textbooks, the learning activity was balanced by gender, but the non-learning activities presented boys more frequently. For both paper and digital textbooks, most pupils were described to be active regardless of gender. For adults, paper textbooks were balanced in the frequency by gender, but digital textbooks had a higher proportion of men. Paper textbooks showed similar gender rates in out-of-home activities, but more men in housework activities. In digital textbooks, housework activities were balanced by gender, but out-of-home activities presented men more frequently. For both paper and digital textbooks, men appeared in a broader range of occupations than women. Female scientists appeared more than male scientists in paper textbooks, and opposite tendency appeared in digital textbooks. As a result of analyzing the characteristics of adults, both paper and digital textbooks showed gender stereotypes in specific behavioral characteristics.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, D. A. & Hamilton, M. (2005). Gender role stereotyping of parents in children's picture books: The invisible father. Sex Roles, 52(3-4), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1290-8
  2. Buck, G. A., Clark, V. L. P., Leslie, P. D., Lu, Y. & Cerda, L. P. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688-707. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20257
  3. Bybee, R. & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
  4. Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A. & Wingfield, L. C. (2010). The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366552
  5. Huck, C. S., Heplers, S. & Hickman, J. (1993). Children's literature in the elementary school (5th ed). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
  6. Jung, J. & Kim, Y. (2014). A study on elementary students' perceptions of science, engineering, and technology and on the images of scientists, engineers, and technicians. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 719-730. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.8.0719
  7. Kang, H., Lee, J., Kim, H. & Noh, T. (2016). An analysis for gender-role stereotyping of texts and illustrations in elementary science textbooks developed under 2009 revised national curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(4), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.4.454
  8. Kim, D. (2001). Sociology of gender [성의 사회학]. Seoul: Mooneumsa.
  9. Kim, S. & Park, I. (2002). The relationship among sex-role Stereotype, sex-role identity and self-esteem for elementary school students. Chungnam Journal of Nursing Academy, 5(1), 81-92.
  10. Kim, Y. & Yang, I. (2005). The factor analysis of affecting elementary students' science attitude change. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(3), 292-300.
  11. KSSC (2017). Korean standard classification of occupations. KOSTAT.
  12. Kwon, N. (2005). Elementary school students' perceptions of scientist and socio-cultural background towards science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(1), 59-67.
  13. Lambert, D. & Butt, G. (1996). The role of textbooks: An assessment issue? Teaching Geography, 21(4), 202-203.
  14. Lee, M. & Kim, K. (2004). Relationship between attitudes toward science and science achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(2), 399-407.
  15. Lee, M., Shin, D. & Bong, M. (2018). Elementary school students' science motivation and achievement by gender and science-related career aspirations. Journal of Career Education Research, 31(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.32341/jcer.2018.09.31.3.1
  16. Lim, H., Oh, P., Kwon, G., Shin, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, C. & Park, S. (2014). Elementary students' perceptions on the use of digital science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(4), 454-468. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.4.454
  17. MOE (2015). National curriculum of science. Ministry of Education Announcement 2015-74 [supplement 9]. Sejong: MOE.
  18. MOE & KEDI (2018). Educational statistics analysis data collections. Jincheon: KEDI.
  19. MOE & KERIS. (2018). Good lessons with digital textbooks. (TM 2018-14) [디지털교과서로 좋은 수업하기]. Daegu: KERIS.
  20. MOEL & KEIS (2018). Korea employment classification of occupations. Eumseong: KEIS.
  21. Noh, T., Cha, J. & Wang, H. (2004). An analysis for gender-role stereotyping of illustrations in elementary science textbooks based on the 7th curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(1), 85-91.
  22. Noh, T. & Choi, Y. (1997). The analysis for gender-role stereotyping in elementary science-related textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 16(1), 1-9.
  23. Ohn, J. (2015). Direction and major revisions of the 2015 revised national curriculum. (Issue paper 07 CP 2015-01-7) [2015 개정 교육과정의 방향과 주요개정 내용]. Seoul: KEDI.
  24. Park, S., Jang, K. & Song, J. (1992). Attitudes of boys and girls in elementary and secondary schools towards science lessons and scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 12(3), 109-118.
  25. Sang, K., Kwak, Y., Park, J. H. & Park, S. (2016). The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS): Findings from TIMSS 2015 for Korea. (Research report RRE 2016-15-1). Seoul: KICE.
  26. Shin, S. & Park, I. (2002). Stereotyped idea of a sex role in elementary school students. Chungnam Journal of Nursing Academy, 5(1), 54-65.
  27. Trepanier-Street, M. L. & Romatowski, J. A. (1999). The influence of children's literature on gender role perceptions: A reexamination. Early Childhood Education Journal, 26(3), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022977317864
  28. Vande Berg, L. & Trujillo, N. (1989). Organizational life on television. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  29. You, J., Lee, J. & Noh, T. (2011). An analysis for gender-role stereotyping of illustrations in elementary science textbooks developed under 2007 revised national curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2011.30.4.553