DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review Focused on Health Behavior and Physiological Indicators of Diabetic Patients in Interventional Studies Based on Health Belief Model

건강신념모델 기반 중재연구가 당뇨환자의 건강행위와 생리적지표에 미치는 효과를 중심으로 한 체계적 문헌고찰

  • Received : 2019.12.08
  • Accepted : 2020.02.20
  • Published : 2020.02.29

Abstract

Purpose: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of death with a prevalence rate of 12.4% in South Korea. Self-management is crucial for patients with DM, because many studies have reported that self-management intervention based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) is effective. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current state of HBM based intervention studies and the components and effects of the theories used in the study for diabetes patients. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases from January 2009 to May 2019. We reviewed characteristics of intervention based on the HBM in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental study intervention. Results: Eight studies published in English between 2009 and 2019 were included in this review. The key components of the health behavior promotion program applied to the DM patients were perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers and self-efficacy. The intervention based on these components has reported to significantly increase the health behavior change, likelihood of taking health action and improve physiological indicators (HbA1c, and fasting blood sugar etc.). Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of intervention programs based on the HBM for DM patients.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. Diabetes [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2018 October 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes.
  2. Korean Statistical Information Service. Korean national health and nutrition examination survey [Internet]. Deajeon: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 20]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId= M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01#SelectStatsBoxDiv.
  3. Korean Statistical Information Service. Cause of death statistics [Internet]. Deajeon: Korean Statistical Information Service; 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1012#quick_02
  4. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):917-928. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007
  5. Song MS. Diabetes self-mangement education in the community. The Journal of Korean Diabetes. 2014;15(2):98-103. https://doi.org/10.4093/jkd.2014.15.2.98
  6. Johnson CE, Mues KE, Mayne SL, Kiblawi AN. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the health belief model. Journal of Lower Qenital Tract Disease. 2008;12(3):232-241. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e31815d8d88.
  7. Jones PK, Jones SL, Katz J. Improving compliance for asthmatic patients visiting the emergency department using a health belief model intervention. The Journal of Asthma. 1987;24(4):199-206. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770908709070940
  8. Wai CT, Wong ML, Cheok A, Tan MH, Chua W, Mak B, et al. Utility of the health belief model in predicting compliance of screening in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2005; 21(10):1255-1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02497.x
  9. Rosenstock, IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Eduacation and Behavior. 1974;2(4):328-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403
  10. Jo HS, Kim CB, Lee HW, Jeong HJ. A meta-analysis of health related behavior study based on health belief model in Korean. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2004;9(1):69-84.
  11. Teixeira PJ, Carraca EV, Marques MM, Rutter H, Oppert JM, Bourdeaudhuij ID, et al. Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1):84-99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0323-6
  12. Fleury J, Sidani S. Using theory to guide intervention research. In Melnyk BM, Morrison-Beedy D (Eds.). Intervention research: designing, conducting, analyzing and funding. 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2012. p. 11-36.
  13. Kim SY, Park JE, Seo HJ, Lee YJ, Jang BH, Son HJ, et al. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Final report. Seoul: National Evidence-baed Healthcare Collaborating Agenccy; 2011 Agu. Report No.: 987-89-94581-59-0.
  14. Critical Apparisal Skills Programme. CASP checklists [Internet]. England: Critical Apparisal Skills Programme; 2019 [cited 2019 May 31]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
  15. Chrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-management education for adults with 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the effecr on glycemic control. Patient Education and Counseling. 2016;(99):926-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.003
  16. Baghianimoghadam MH, Shogafard G, Sanati HR, Baghianimoghadam B, Mazloomy SS, Askarshahi M. Acta Medica Iranica. 2013;51(1):52-58.
  17. Tarkang EE, Zotor FB. Application of the health belief model in HIV prevention: a literature review. Central African Journal of Public Health. 2015;1(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cajph.20150101.11
  18. Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the health belieh model with adults. Health Education Research. 1992;7(1):107-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/7.1.107
  19. Hayden J. Introduction to health behavior theory. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017. p.57-82.
  20. Aljasem LI, Peyrot M, Wissow L, Rubin RR. The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2001;27(3):393-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/014572170102700309
  21. Austin LT, Ahmad F, McNally MJ, Stewart DE. Breast and cervical cancer screening in hispanic women: a literature review using the health belief model. Women's Health Issues. 2002;12(3):122-128. https://doi.org /10.1016/s1049-3867(02)00132-9
  22. Karaoui LR, Deeb ME, Nasser L, Hallit S. Knowledge and practice of patients with diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):525-533. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5416-7
  23. Shrivastava SR, Shrivatava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. 2013;12:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6581-12-14
  24. Ghazanfari Z, Haghdoost AA, Alizadeh SM, Atapour J, Zolala F. A comparison of HbA1c and fasting blood sugar test in general population. International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010;1(3):187-194.
  25. Yuan C, Lai CWK, Chan LWC, Chow M, Law HKW, Ying M. The effect of diabetes self-management education on body weight, glycemic control, and other metabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2014;2014:789761. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/789761
  26. Steincbekk A, Rygg L, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based diabetes self-management eduaction compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:213. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-213