DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of Selective Consent Method in the Collection Process of Personal Information of Financial Institutions

금융기관의 개인정보 수집 절차 중 선택적 동의 방식의 개선방안

  • Sun, Jong-chun (Graduate School of Information Security, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, In-seok (Graduate School of Information Security, Korea University)
  • Received : 2019.11.27
  • Accepted : 2020.02.14
  • Published : 2020.02.28

Abstract

Although the rights of data subjects are defined through laws such as the Personal Information Protection Act, the consent process for collecting personal information by financial institutions is only formal and does not guarantee the right of self-determination of personal information. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the problem by information provision items of the current model, and to improve by changing the structure such as replacing the current method provided with the text with pictures and videos, and mandatory to provide the information subjects with personal information flow related images from the signing up stage. The improvement model is presented as a way to add a procedure to the current model. The effect was verified through a survey. It is hoped that the proposed model is actually reflected through the review to create an environment that can be a true meaning agreement that reflects the information subject's right to self-determination.

개인정보보호법 등의 법률을 통해 정보 주체자의 권리가 정의되어 있으나 현재 금융기관의 개인정보수집 동의 절차는 형식적 일뿐 정보 주체자의 개인정보 자기결정권을 보장하지 못하고 있다. 이에 현재 방식의 정보제공 항목 별로 문제점을 분석하고, 글로 제공되는 현재의 방식을 그림/영상으로 대체 하는 등의 구조를 변경 해 개선하는 방안과 가입단계에서부터 개인정보흐름 관련 영상을 의무적으로 정보주체에게 제공하는 등의 현재 방식에 절차를 추가하는 방안으로 나눠 개선 방식을 제시하였다. 그리고 그 효과를 설문조사를 통해 검증하였다. 제시 한 방식이 검토를 통해 실제 반영되어 정보 주체자의 개인정보 자기결정권이 반영 된 진정한 의미의 동의가 될 수 있는 환경이 조성되었으면 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, H., "A Study on the Legislative Method for Promoting the Use of Personal Information in Big data Environments," Korea University, 2019.
  2. Article No.1 of the Personal Information Protection Act, https://www.law.go.kr.
  3. Article No.15 of the Personal Information Protection Act, https://www.law.go.kr
  4. Constitutional Court 2005. 5. 26 Sentence 99 Constitution 513, law reports 17-1, pp 683.
  5. Financial Privacy Guidelines p. 7, 2016.12 https://www.privacy.go.kr/inf/gdl/selectBoardList.do.
  6. Inha University University-Industry Foundation, "a study on the improvement of consent proceduremethod according to collection of personal information and on the introduction of management grading system of personal information protection," Communications Commission
  7. Jang, G. H., "An improved Model of Effectiveness on the Implementation of Personal Information Utilization Agreement in Financial Companies," Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology, Vol.26, No.1, 2016.
  8. Jung, J. H., "An introduction to constitutional law," Parkyoungsa, pp. 396-397, 2017.
  9. Kim, S. H., "A study on Decision Making Model for Personal Information Collection and Use Policy Establishment through Internet Homepage of Financial Companies," Journal of The Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology, Vol.27, No.3, 2017.
  10. Kim, S., "The Collecting of Minimum Personal Information Necessary & Freedom of Contract," Kangwon Institute of Comparative Law, No.52 pp. 125-161, 2017
  11. Lee, E. S., Lee, Z. K., and Cha, K. J., "The Experimental Research of Protection Behavior Dependson Privacy Concern about Personal Information Protection on Privacy Policy for KakaoTalk Users," The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol.21, No.2, pp. 135-150, May 2016.
  12. Lee, S. M., "The study on the constitutional basis of the right to informational self-determination," Korean Public Law Association, p. 227, 2008.
  13. Personal Information Protection Annual Report, Personal Information Protection Commission, 2019
  14. Personal Information Annual Report Privacy Committee, 2017.
  15. Seoul High Court 2014.1.9 Sentence 2013N U,14476judgement, https://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/panre/sjo100.do?contId=2214240.
  16. Supreme Court 2016.6.28 Sentence 2014N U 2638, judgement.https://glaw.scourt.go.kr/wsjo/panre/sjo100.do?contId=2208353.