DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Gaze Differences between Pre-service Teachers and Experienced Teachers on Mathematics Lesson Plan

예비교사와 경력교사의 수학 수업지도안에 대한 시선 차이 분석

  • Son, Taekwon (Graduate School of Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Ho (Korea National University of Education)
  • Received : 2019.10.08
  • Accepted : 2019.12.21
  • Published : 2020.01.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the process of reading and understanding mathematics lesson plan through eye-tracking to suggest implications of pre-service teacher education. As a result of the analysis, the pre-service teachers felt that the mathematics lesson plans were more difficult than the experienced teacher, they read and understood the mathematics lesson plan in sequential order. Experienced teachers, on the other hand, used a hypertext reading strategy to find key topics and make connections in order to grasp the flow of instruction in mathematics lesson plan. Based on these results, several suggestions were drawn for pre-service teachers when teaching their ability to read and understand mathematics lesson plan.

본 연구에서는 예비교사와 경력교사가 수학 수업지도안을 읽고 이해하는 과정을 시선 추적(Eye-tracking)을 통해 분석하였다. 두 그룹의 시선 데이터를 분석한 결과, 예비 교사들은 수학 수업지도안을 경력교사에 비해 어렵게 느끼고 있었으며 선조적인 방식으로 수학 수업지도안을 읽고 이해하였다. 반면, 경력교사들은 수학 수업지도안의 흐름을 파악하기 위해 핵심 주제어들을 찾아 연결성을 만들어가는 하이퍼텍스트 읽기 전략을 활용하였으며 수학 수업모형의 핵심 영역을 방문하는 시간이 유의미하게 길었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 예비교사들이 수학 수업지도안을 읽고 이해하는 역량을 지도할 때 숙고해야할 여러 시사점들을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education (2017). Mathematics Teacher's Manual 1-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education Inc.
  2. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development. (2002). Mathematics teacher's manual fifth grade-ga. Seoul: Daehan Printing and Publishing.
  3. Kwon, S. H. (2003). Reestablishment of definition of reading comprehension in hypertext. Korean language education research, 16, 39-65.
  4. Kim, G. Y., & Jun, M. H. (2017). Exploring teachers' pedagogical design capacity : How mathematics teachers plan and design their mathematics lessons. The Mathematical Education, 56(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2017.56.4.365
  5. Kim, B. S., & Im, J. Y.(2014) A Study on the schemes for elevating instruction specialties through Subject PCK. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(5), 1-23.
  6. Kim, S. S. (2017). A study on the teachers' questioning type in the lesson scripts. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(12), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.14257/AJMAHS.2017.12.19
  7. Kim, S. M. (2014). Types and characteristics of introduction part of elementary mathematics classes exposed to lesson plans composed by elementaryteachers. Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.1.78
  8. Kim, S. H. (2011). Exploring theoretical aspects of effective lesson planning. The Journal of Elementary Education, 24(3), 97-115.
  9. Kim, J. H. (1994). Hypermedia, multimedia and hypertext: Definitions and overview. Journal of information management, 25(1), 24-46.
  10. Kim, P. W. (2017). A study on the teaching and learning of visual materials using eye tracking analysis. Korean Education, 110, 67-91. https://doi.org/10.15734/koed..110.201703.67
  11. Park, K. Y., Bae, Y. G., & Kang, E. C. (2009). A case study on instructional design process of pre-service teachers in practice teaching. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(3), 169-197.
  12. Park, K. Y. (2018). A study on pre-service elementary teachers' instructional design experience. The Journal of Elementary Education, 31(4), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.29096/jee.31.4.03
  13. Pang, J. S., Kim, M. G., & O, Y. W. (2004). A study on the research and development of elementary mathematics ICT applied lesson plan. Communications of Mathematical Education, 18(1), 61-72.
  14. Pang, J. S. (2009). An analysis of mathematics instruction for the professional development of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Education Society, 11, 35-70.
  15. Pang, J. S., & Jo, S. Y. (2014). A survey of lesson plan for mathematics instruction by elementary school teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(4), 365-390.
  16. Byeon, J. H., Lee, I. S., & Yang, I. H. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
  17. O, J. H. (2011). Research on educational utilization of hypertext characteristics. Korean Education, 87, 139-164.
  18. Lee, K. S., & Kang, O. K. (2008). A Study on the Establishment of the Criteria for Teaching Reflection for the Professional Enhancement of Mathematics Teachers. School Mathematics, 10(2), 199-222.
  19. Lee, M. J., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Elementary student's formation of relational thinking about equation-Centered for web-based balance. School Mathematics, 17(3), 391-405.
  20. Lee, S. R. (2014). A research on traits of adolescents' reading and eye movement in internet reading. Korean language education research, 49(2), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.20880/kler.2014.49.2.417
  21. Lee, J. E., Lim, W., & Kim, H. J. (2016). Lesson planning: How do pre-service teachers benefit from examining lesson plans with mathematics teaching practices as an analytical lens? Education of Primary School Mathematics, 19(3), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2016.19.3.211
  22. Lee, H. K., Lee, S. K., Kim, H. J., & Park, H. B. (2012). An analysis of the form and the content of elementary school lesson plan in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 25(4), 1-29.
  23. Jang, M. D. (2006). Analysis of pre-service teachers' lesson planing strategies in elementary school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 191-205.
  24. Jeon, S. M., & You, S. L. (2015). An analysis of physical education lesson plan focused on improving creativity and character. The Korean Journal of Elementary Physical Education, 21(1), 153-164.
  25. Jung, S. K. (2010). Effective instructional designs and practices for the improvement of teaching techniques. Seoul: Wonmi Ins.
  26. Jung, H. H. (2009a). A study on the actual conditions of secondary student teachers' instruction design during the teaching practicum. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 12(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2009.12.2.1
  27. Jung. H. H. (2009b). A study on the instruction design experiences of elementary school teachers. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 157-191. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.25.3.157
  28. Jung. H. H. (2010). An analysis on the lesson plans from the class-participation point of view. The Journal of Elementary Education, 23(1), 261-281.
  29. Choi, S. K. (2013). The exploring reading education for multimodal text based reading behavior analysis in digital literacy environment. Journal of reading research, 29, 224-264.
  30. Choi, S. H., & Hwang, H. J. (2009). The research on pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) focused on instructional consulting for secondary beginning teachers. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 12(1), 27-45.
  31. Hong, M. H. (2013). Activity types in lesson plans on social studies by elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Social Studies Lesson Study, 1(1), 1-12.
  32. Andra, C., Lindstrom, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9484-y
  33. Bergstrom, J. R., & Schall, A. (2014). Eye tracking in user experience design. USA, Elsevier.
  34. Bojko, A. (2013). Eye tracking the user experience: A practical guide to research. USA, NY: Rosenfeld Media.
  35. Bolden, D., Barmby, P., Raine, S. & Gardner, M. (2014). How young children view mathematical representations, a study using eye-tracking technology. Educational Research, 57(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.983718
  36. Chen, Y. C. & Yang, F. Y. (2014). Probing the relationship between process of spatial problems solving and science learning: An eye tracking approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 579-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9504-y
  37. Chevallard, Y. (1991). La Transposition Didactique-du savoir savant au savoir enseigne'. Grenoble: La Pensee sauvage, editions.
  38. Henderson, J. M., Weeks Jr, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210-228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.210
  39. Horsley, M., Eliot, M., Knight, B.A. & Reilly, R. (2014). Current trend in eye tracking research (1st ed.), London: Springer.
  40. Kim, S. H. & Yang, I. H. (2016). A case study of the novice and experienced teachers eye movement in elementary science classes. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(12), 1149-1163. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2016.16.12.1149
  41. Koh, S. R., Yoon, S. J., Min, C. H., Choi, K. S., Ko, S. H., & Hwang, M. A. (2010). The characteristics of eye-movement during children read Korean texts. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 21, 481-503. https://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2010.21.4.003
  42. Leinhardt G. (1989). Math Lessons: A contrast of novice and experienced Competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/749098
  43. Lim. W, Son, J. W, Kim, D. J. (2018). Understanding preservice teacher skills to construct lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9783-1
  44. Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 4(4), 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
  45. Mehlinger, H. D. (1995). School reform in the information age. Bloomington, USA, IN: Indiana University Press.
  46. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
  47. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. 류희찬, 조완영, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 공역(2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준. 서울: 경문사.
  48. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Mathematics teaching today: Improving practice, improving student learning. 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 역(2011). 수학 수업의 현재와 미래. 서울: 경문사.
  49. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
  50. Park, Y. M. (2012). A study on the reading process characteristics of the students with reading difficulty based on eye movement. Korean Language Education, 139, 335-362.
  51. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
  52. Reys, R., Lindquist, M. M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2009). Helping children learn mathematics (9th ed.). 박성선, 김민경, 방정숙, 권점례 역(2012). 초등 교사를 위한 수학과 교수법. 서울: 경문사.
  53. Schindler, M., & Lilienthal, A. (2018). Eye-tracking for studying mathematical difficulties: also in inclusive settings. In Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME-42), 4, 115-122.
  54. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  55. Shulman, L. S. (2005). To dig of the nify the profession teacher. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(5), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.37.5.22-29
  56. Ulrich, C., O'Donnell, P., Taylor, C., Farrar, A., Danis, M., & Grady, C. (2007). Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States. Social science & medicine, 65(8), 1708-1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.050