References
- Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25-45. doi:10.1080/00220272.2010.521261.
- Baekgaard, M. and Serritzlew, S. (2015). Interpreting performance information: motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 73-82, doi: 10.1111/puar.12406.
- Ballard, A. (2019). Promoting performance information use through data visualization: evidence from an experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(1), 109-128, doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1592763.
- Benkler, Y. (1998). The commons as a neglected factor of information policy. Paper presented at the Telecommunications Research Conference, Alexandria, VA.
- Benkler, Y. (2003). The political economy of commons. Upgrade: The European Journal for the Informatics Professional, 4(3), 6-9.
- Berman, E. (2002). How useful is performance measurement. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 348-351. doi:10.2307/3381127.
- Bourdeaux, C., and Chikoto, G. (2008). Legislative influences on performance management reform. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00860.x
- Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review, 46(November), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.2307/975569
- CHRR. (2012). Ohio workforce data quality initiative: Research data system and access. Paper presented at the Advisory Meeting, Columbus, OH.
- CHRR. (2013). Ohio analytics research agenda interview findings. Paper presented at the Advisory Meeting, Columbus, OH.
- Dawes, S. (1996). Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199622)15:3<377::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-F
- Dawes, S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001.
- Dawes, S. (2012). A realistic look at open data. Paper presented at Using Open Data Workshop. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/presentation-dawes.pdf, 4 December 2016.
- Dawes, S., Pardo, T. A., and Cresswell, A. M. (2004). Designing electronic government information access programs: A holistic approach. Government Information Quarterly, 21(1), 3-23. doi: 10.1016/j.giq, 02 November 2003.
- Dillon, S. (2006). As 2 Bushes try to fix schools, tools differ. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/education/28child.html, 8 January 2017
- Department of Labor. (2013a). Ohio's design plan. Retrieved from http://www.doleta.gov/performance/pfdocs/Ohio.pdf, 15 February 2017.
- Department of Labor. (2013b). Workforce data quality initiative (WDQI) orientation web meeting. Columbus, OH.
- Evans, A. M., and Campos, A. (2013). Open government initiatives: Challenges of citizen participation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(1), 172-185. doi:10.1002/pam.21651.
- Fozzard, A. (2001). The basic budgeting problem approaches to resource allocation in the public sector and their implications for pro-poor budgeting. Working Paper 147 Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.
- Frederickson, D. G., and Frederickson, H. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Friedlander, A., and Adler, P. (2006). To stand the test of time: long-term stewardship of digital data sets in science and engineering. Paper presented at ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships Report to the National Science Foundation. Http://editlib.org/p/69918. 1 April 2017.
- Government Accountability Office. (2010). Department of education: improved dissemination and timely product release would enhance the usefulness of the what works clearinghouse. GAO-10-644. Report to Congressional Committees. Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office.
- Government Accountability Office. (2011a). Postsecondary education: many states collect graduates' employment information, but clear guidance on student privacy requirements is needed. GAO-10-927. Report to Congressional Committees. Washington DC: United States General Accounting Office.
- Government Accountability Office. (2011b). Managing for results: GPRA modernization act implementation provides important opportunities to address government challenges. Washington DC: Government Accountability Office.
- Government Accountability Office. (2012). A guide for using the GPRA modernization act to help inform congressional decision making. Washington DC: Government Accountability Office.
- Government Accountability Office. (2013). Unemployment insurance information technology: States face challenges in modernization efforts. Washington DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
- Ginsberg, W. R. (2011). Obama administration's open government initiative: Issues for congress. R41361. CRS Report for Congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service.
- Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., and Pardo, T. (2012). Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17(2), 83-97. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-0269.
- Hawley, J., and Hsu. Y. (2012). Demonstration on Ohio workforce data quality initiative. Paper presented at the 25th Annual STATS-DC Data Conference. Washington, D.C.
- Heinrich, C. (2012). How credible is the evidence, and does it matter? An analysis of the program assessment rating tool. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 123-134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02490.x.
- Heinrich, C.J. (2007a). Evidence-based policy and performance management: Challenges and prospects in two parallel movements. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 255-277. doi:10.1177/0275074007301957.
- Heinrich, C.J. (2007b). False or fitting recognition? The use of high performance bonuses in motivating organizational achievements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(2), 281-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20244
- Heinrich, C.J. (2008). Advancing public sector performance analysis. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 24(5), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.725
- Heinrich, C.J., Peter, R. and Troske, K. (2008). The role of temporary help employment in low-wage worker advancement. In D. Autor (eds.), Studies of Labour Market Inter Mediation (pp 399-436). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Hess, C. and Ostrom. E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: Information as a commonpool resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 111-145. doi:10.2307/20059174.
- Hess, C. and Ostrom. E (2007). Understanding knowledge as commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hsu, Y. (2011). Gainful employment regulation amendment in higher education act of 1965. Final Report in Higher Education Policy. Columbus, OH.
- Ikemoto, G.S. and Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the "data-driven" mantra: Different perceptions of data-driven decision making. In Moss, P. A. (eds.), Evidence and Decision Making: 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 104-131). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
- ILO (2001). The impact of decentralization and privatization on municipal services. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb283/pdf/jmmsr.pdf, 15 April 2020.
- Jennings, E.T. and Hall. J.L. (2012). Evidence-based practice and the use of information in state agency decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 245-266. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur040.
- Kelly, J.M. (2002). Why we should take performance measurement on faith (facts being hard to come by and not terribly important). Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 375-380. doi:10.2307/3381132.
- Kim, T., Johansen, M. and Zhu, L. (2019). The effects of managers' purposeful performance information use on American hospital performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(1), 129-156. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1638275.
- Koning, P. and Heinrich, C. (2010). Cream-skimming, parking and other intended and unintended effects of performance-based contracting in social welfare services. (Discussion Paper 46). IZA. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1570399, 3 March 2012.
- Kroll, A. (2015). Explaining the use of performance information by public managers: a planned-behavior approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(2), 201-215, doi:10.1177/0275074013486180
- Kranich, N. and Schement, J. R. (2008). Information commons. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 546-591. doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420119.
- Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. The World Bank: Washington, D.C.
- Lee, C. (2019). Understanding the diverse purposes of performance information use in nonprofits: An empirical study of factors influencing the use of performance measures. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(1), 81-108. doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1596136
- Lee, J. and Johnston, E.W. (2013). How to embed transparency into collaborative governance. PA Times Online. Retrieved from http://patimes.org/embed-transparency-collaborative-governancee, 5 October 2017.
- Lee, J. Y. & Wang, X. (2009). Assessing the impact of performance-based budgeting: a comparative analysis across the United States, Taiwan, and China. Public Administration Review, 69(Special Issue), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02090.x
- Lewin, T. (2013). Obama's plan aims to lower cost of college. The New York Times, Dated 22 August 2013.
- Lynch, C. (2008). Big data: How do your data grow? Nature, 455(7209), 28-29. doi:10.1038/455028a.
- Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., & Light, D. (2006). A theoretical framework for data-driven decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
- Martin, M. (2013). MacArthur fellow crunches data to streamline health care. NPR.org. Http://www.npr.org/2013/09/26/226477356/macarthur-fellow-crunches-data-to-streamline-health-care, 5 January 2018.
- McGinnis, M.D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51-78. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x.
- McGinnis, M.D., and Ostrom, E. (2012). Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 15-25. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02488.x.
- Moynihan, D.P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Moynihan, D., Fernandez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K., Piotrowski, S., Wright, B., and Yang, K. (2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(s1), i141-155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq059
- Moynihan, D. and Pandey, S. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849-866.doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004.
- Mueser, P.R., Troske, K.R. and Gorislavsky, A. (2007). Using state administrative data to measure program performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 761-783. doi:10.1162/rest.89.4.761.
- Noveck, B.S. (2009). Wiki Government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- OECD. (2018). OECD Draft policy framework on sound public governance. https://www.oecd.org/gov/draft-policy-framework-on-sound-public-governance.pdf, 12 April 2020.
- OECD. (n. d.). Enhancing research performance through evaluation, impact assessment and priority setting. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/Enhancing-Public-Research-Performance.pdf, 10 April 2020.
- Ohio Education Research Center. (2012). The Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://oerc.osu.edu/data/available-data, 5 October 2018.
- Orszag, P.R. (2009). Open Government Directive. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
- Ostrom, E. (2007a). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed P.A. Sabatier (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
- Ostrom, E. (2007b). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15181-15187. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104.
- Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7-27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.
- Pardo, T.A., Gil-Garcia, J.R. and Burke., G.B. (2008). Governance structures in cross-boundary information sharing: Lessons from state and local criminal justice initiatives. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. The Proceedings of the 41st Annual, 211-211. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2008.185.
- Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Sanchez, C. (2013). Do the data exist to make a college-rating system work? NPR.org. Http://www.npr.org/2013/08/22/214520122/does-the-data-exist-to-make-college-rating-system-work, 7 May 2015.
- Stevens, D. (2012). Documents and presentations enabled by or related to the administrative data research and evaluation (ADARE) project 1998-2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Http://www.jacob-france-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/ADARE-publications-presentations-compendium-11-8-12.pdf, 1 October 2017.
- Sylvia, R. D. and Sylvia, K. M. (2004). Program planning and evaluation for the public manager. Chicago, Illinois: Waveland Press.
- Thorn, C.A. and Meyer, R.H. (2006). Longitudinal data systems to support data-informed decision making a tri-state partnership between Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. WCER Working Paper No. 2006-1. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
- Walker, R. M., Lee, M. J., James, O. and Ho, S. M. Y (2018). Analyzing the complexity of performance information use: experiments with stakeholders to disaggregate dimensions of performance, data sources, and data types. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 852-863. doi:10.1111/puar.12920.
- Wang, R.Y and Strong, D.M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information System, 12(4), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
- Wang, X.H. (2008) Convincing legislators with performance measures. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(6), 654-667. doi:10.1080/01900690701641232.
- Wang, X.H. and Berman, E. (2001). Hypotheses about performance measurement in counties: Findings from a survey. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003508