DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영국, 미국, 일본의 '역사적 도시공원' 보존 전략 사례 연구

A Case Study on the Preservation Strategies of 'Historic Urban Parks' in the UK, the USA, and Japan

  • 길지혜 ((사)이코모스 한국위원회) ;
  • 박희성 (서울시립대학교 서울학연구소)
  • 투고 : 2020.02.25
  • 심사 : 2020.03.23
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30

초록

본 연구는 국제적으로 도시공원의 유산 가치를 인정하고 보존하려는 움직임에 주목하여 국제사회에서 논의되고 있는 도시공원의 보존 동향을 살펴보고자 했다. 국제적으로 '역사적 도시공원' 개념이 등장하게 된 배경과 추진상황을 확인하고, 도시공원의 보존과 관리를 이미 수행하는 영국, 미국, 일본의 사례를 분석하였다. 문화유산의 보전·관리를 중시하는 국제 전문가집단인 ICOMOS에서는 최근 ICOMOS-IFLA 문서를 통해, 역사적 도시공원의 사회적·무형적 가치, 심미적 가치, 생태적 가치, 시민 사회적 가치를 지속하고, 공간 구성, 지형, 빛, 환경과 같은 공원 요소를 보존해야 한다고 하였다. 영국과 미국, 일본은 역사적 도시공원 보존 동향이 나타나게 된 배경, 실제 보존 체계, 보존 대상으로 고려하는 도시공원, 공원 내 보존 요소에 저마다의 특성이 있다. 영국은 시기별로 나타나는 공원의 디자인을 존중하고, 각 시기를 대표하는 공원의 형태 요소를 보존하고자 한다. 미국은 공원의 의미를 물리적 형태뿐 아니라, 문화, 기념성, 사회적 가치 등 다양한 각도에서 파악하여 보존할 공원을 선정하고 관리한다. 일본은 보존 가치가 있는 근대공원을 조사해 선별하고, 공원의 보존 관리를 정책적으로 시행하기 시작했다. 전문가들은 역사적 도시공원의 보존은 기존 정원이나 공원과는 다른 방향으로 이루어져야 한다고 주장한다. 그럼에도 각국 사례를 보면 아직은 문화유산과 도시공원을 다루는 행정과 법제에 따라 물리적 요소를 보존하는데 다소 한정되어 있었다. 변화하는 유산의 개념과 정의의 맥락에서 도시공원의 보존 기준과 방법 또한 발전하고 정교해질 것이다. 도시공원은 역사적으로 여러 가치가 축적된 공간이며, 공원과 도시민의 기억에 많은 역사적 의미를 내재하고 있다. 국제적으로는 이러한 공원의 역사적 가치를 존중하고 보존하는 방향으로 관리가 진행되고 있음을 확인하였다. 도시공원의 가치를 보존하고자 하는 국제 동향은 운영과 관리 문제에 직면한 우리의 도시공원에 시사하는 바가 크다.

This study aims to examine the trends in the preservation of urban public parks with a focus on the international movement to acknowledge and preserve the heritage value of urban parks. First, the background in which the concept of "historic urban park" first appeared internationally, as well as the current situation were investigated. Then, the cases of the United Kingdom (UK), the United States (US), and Japan, all of which are already preserving and managing urban public parks, were analyzed. In the ICOMOS-IFLA Document on Historic Urban Public Parks, the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), which is a group of specialists dedicated to the conservation and management of cultural heritage, mentions that it is necessary to maintain the social, intangible, aesthetic, ecological, and civic values of historic urban public parks. In addition, according to ICOMOS, it is necessary to preserve elements of parks, such as space composition, topography, light, and environment. The UK, the USA, and Japan have their own unique characteristics for the background of preserving urban parks, the preservation system, the selection of parks to be preserved, and the elements to be preserved within the park. The UK has categorized parks into certain types from each period and has tried to preserve the common elements in each type. The US has selected the parks to preserve by determining the meaning of the parks itself considering multiple aspects, embracing not only the physical form of the parks, but also the culture, monumentality, and social values. Recently, Japan began the preservation of historic urban parks as a matter of policy and started to implement a preservation policy by investigating modern parks that are believed to be worth preserving. Specialists in cultural heritage preservation have argued that the method of preservation of historic urban parks must differ from that of other parks or gardens. Nonetheless, observing cases in these three countries showed that, regardless of their administrative and legal systems regarding cultural heritage and urban public parks, their policies were still limited to preserving only the physical elements of parks. The direction and methodology for the preservation of historic urban parks must be developed further and elaborated upon in terms of the evolving concept and definition of heritage. Urban parks are where various historic values are accumulated, connoting historical meanings dealing with the memories of the parks and the urban dwellers. This study found that, worldwide, park management has been carried out in a way that the historic values of parks are respected and preserved. This global trend in preserving the historic values of urban public parks has significant implications for the management of urban public parks in Korea that are being formed and renewed repeatedly.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, G. B.(2001) A study on the conception of historic park and its types. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 19(36): 1-14.
  2. Ahn, S. M.(2014) Reconsideration of park planning in Seoul, especially about neighborhood playgrounds created with Kyoungseong street planning and land readjustment project from 1936. The Journal of Seoul Studies 55: 131-173. https://doi.org/10.17647/jss.2014.02.54.131
  3. Bureau of Construction, Tokyo Metropolitan Government(東京都建設局)(2015a) Park Management Masterplan (Revised)(パークマネジメントマスター.プラン(改訂版)).
  4. Bureau of Construction, Tokyo Metropolitan Government(東京都建設 局)(2015b) Management Plan for Hibiya Park(日比谷公園マネジメントプラン).
  5. Cho, S. H.(2016) Park and Green Space Planning in Urban Planning Process of Gyeongseong. Master's Thesis of University of Seoul.
  6. Choi, J. H. and Y. W. Nam(2014) The heritage value of Yongsan Military Base and its direction of urban development. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society 17(2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2014.17.1.1
  7. Conway, H. and D. Lambert(1993) Public Prospects. London: The Garden History Society and the Victorian Society.
  8. Conway, H.(1991) People's Parks: The Design and Development of Victorian Parks in Britian. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  9. English Heritage(2014) National Review of Research Priorities for Urban Parks, Designed Landscapes, and Open Spaces.
  10. Frenchman, D. and J. S. Lane(2008) Assessment of Preservation and Development in Lowell National Historical Park at Its 30-Year Anniversary. National Park Service.
  11. Gil, J. H., H. S. Park and J. M. Park(2016) Analysis on trends in the designation and development of historical parks in Korea. Journal of KILA 44(2): 130-142.
  12. Hibiya Park Grand Design Executive Committee(日比谷公園グランドデザイン檢討委員會)(2018) Five Ideas for the Grand Design of Hibiya Park(日比谷公園グランドデザイン: 5つの提言).
  13. Historic England(2017) Urban Landscapes-Register of Parks and Gardens Selection Guide.
  14. Hwang, J. Y.(2014) Urban Parks as Modern Invention of London and Paris in the Nineteenth Century. Doctoral Dissertation of Seoul National University.
  15. ICOMOS Korea(2010) Collection of ICOMOS Charter Declarations.
  16. Jeong, J. Y., S. R. Cho and Y. J. Kang(2006) A study on establishment and its transfiguration of Yongdusan park in modern times. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 24(1): 69-77.
  17. Kang, S. Y. and Y. H. Chang(2004) Modern History of Korean City Parks. Seoul: Daewangsa.
  18. Kim, H. G. and H. I. Choui(2013) A time sequential research on changes in Jangchungdan park during the period of Japanese colonial rule. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 31(4): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2013.31.4.095
  19. Kim, H. G., Y. S. Kim, and H. J. Yun(2013) 1910's Tap-gol park construction process through design document interpretation. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 31(2):103-117.
  20. Kim, J. E.(2018) The creation of ttukseom pleasure ground and its transformation to a park. Journal of Korean Institute Landscape Architecture 46(1): 127-142. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2018.46.1.127
  21. Kim, S. J. and Y. T. Kim(2012) A study on the criteria for conservation value of modern architecture as culture heritage. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea 14(1): 1-8.
  22. Kim, Y. G. and J. S. Sung(2005) The placeness of Deokjin park in Jeonju City. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(3): 65-77.
  23. Lambert, D. and L. Jonathan(2006) All rosy in the garden?. Journal of Architectural Conservation 12(3): 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2006.10784980
  24. Lee, M. J., J. H. Kim and Y. A. Seo(2019) A study on the tendencies and characteristics when constructing landscape architectural archives in the US. Journal of Korean Institute Landscape Architecture 47(6): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2019.47.6.001
  25. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government(2019) National Planning Policy Framework.
  26. Morath, S. J.(2016) A Park for Everyone: The National Park Service in Urban America. Akron Law Publications 241: 1-21.
  27. National Park Service(2015) Urban Matters: The Call to [Urban] Action.
  28. Ono, R.(小野良平)(2007) Cultural values of public parks in modern age and the significance of conservation of them(近代の公園の文化的価値とその保全の意義). Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture(ランドスケープ硏究) 70(4): 269-272.
  29. Park, I. J. and J. K. Lee(2002) A study on the history of the transformation of the park system in Seoul, Korea. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 20(4): 105-117.
  30. Park, J. W.(2018) A study on the conservation activity for modern landscape heritage of the Japanese institute of landscape architecture. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Eng Ver. 16: 66-74.
  31. Park, S. J.(2003) A cultural reading on Tapgol park. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 30(6): 1-16.
  32. Prothero, S.(2005) Historic urban landscapes-restoration for todays communities. Landscape and Arts Network Journal 41.
  33. Research Group on Modern Gardens, Parks, etc. and Cultural Properties Division of Japan Cultural Affairs(近代の庭園.公園等の調査に関するる検討会.日本文化庁文化財部記念物課)(2012) The Report on Modern Gardens and Parks in Japan(近代の庭園.公園等に関する調査研究報告書).
  34. Ruoff, E.(2008) Threats to the genius loci of the public parks: Saving the historic urban parks of the 19'th Century. The 16th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium.
  35. Son, E. S. and J. H. Pae(2018) Conflicts between the conservation and removal of the modern historic landscapes - a case of the demolition controversy of the Japanese general government building in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 46(4): 21-35. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2018.46.4.021
  36. http://j100s.com/rekishikouen.html (accessed Feb 16, 2020)
  37. http://landscapes.icomos.org (accessed April 10, 2019)
  38. http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6234/ (accessed July 6, 2018)
  39. http://www.heritagegateway.org.uk (accessed April 10, 2019)
  40. http://www.icomog.org (accessed Sep 7, 2018)
  41. http://www.kensetsu.metro.tokyo.jp (accessed Oct 9, 2018)
  42. http://www.tokyo-park.or.jp/profile/bussiness/guide.html (accessed July 6, 2018)
  43. https://catalog.archives.gov (accessed April 10, 2019)
  44. https://historicengland.org.uk (accessed April 10, 2019)
  45. https://npgallery.nps.gov (accessed April 1, 2020)
  46. https://www.archive.gov (accessed April 1, 2020)
  47. https://www.ecfr.gov (accessed April 10, 2019)
  48. https://www.nps.gov (accessed July 6, 2018)
  49. https://www.tclf.org (accessed April 10, 2019)