DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

음식점 위생등급제에 대한 고객 인식도 조사

A survey on customers' perception of a hygiene grade certification system for restaurants

  • 투고 : 2020.01.28
  • 심사 : 2020.03.06
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30

초록

본 연구에서는 음식점 위생등급제의 인식도를 조사하여 위생등급제 활성화 방안을 마련하고자 성인남녀 총 315명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 조사대상자의 성별은 남자가 43.8%, 여자가 56.2%였고, 가족과 동거하는 경우가 73.3%, 1인 가구가 26.7%였다. 조사대상자중 주 1회 이상 외식하는 경우는 전체의 84.5%였으며, 외식 시간대는 '주말저녁' (66.8%)이 가장 많았다. 또한 가장 선호하는 외식업소 유형은 '한식당' (37.5%), '배달음식점' (14.6%), '양식당' (8.9%) 순이었고, '인터넷 검색' (54.0%)을 통해 외식업소 정보를 얻는 경우가 가장 많았다. 그리고 1인 1회 평균 외식비용은 15,483원이었고, 외식에 대한 전체적인 만족도는 평균 3.58점/5점이었다. 음식점 선택속성에 대한 중요도-만족도 분석 결과 우선적으로 개선이 필요한 항목은 '음식의 적정 가격'과 '화장실의 청결'이었다. 또한 음식점 위생등급제를 알고 있는 경우는 전체의 30.5%였고, 향후 위생등급제 인증 음식점 이용 의향은 5점 척도로 평가한 결과 평균 4.02점이었으며, 인증업체 음식에 대한 추가 지불 의향이 있는 경우는 전체의 56.8%였고, 추가로 지불하겠다는 가격은 음식가격의 6.02%였다. 따라서 음식점 위생등급제의 빠른 정착을 위해서는 고객 대상 교육·홍보, 업체 전 직원의 개선 노력과 함께 인증업체에 대한 정부기관의 정책적 지원이 필요하다고 생각된다.

Purpose: This study investigated customers' perception of a hygiene grade certification system for restaurants and this study also determined way to promote the application of the hygiene grade certification. Methods: A total of 315 customer responses were used for the data analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS program (ver. 23.0) for frequency analysis, χ2-tests, t-tests, analysis of variance, and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Results: The composition of the respondents was 43.8% males and 56.2% females. The 73.3% lived with their families while 26.7% lived alone. Among those surveyed, 84.5% dine out at least once a week and 66.8% dine out during weekends evening. In addition, the most preferred types of restaurants were Korean restaurants (37.5%), delivery restaurants (14.6%), and Western restaurants (8.9%). Information about restaurant was most frequently obtained through Internet searches (54.0%). The average expenditure of eating-out per person was 15,483 Korean won, and the overall satisfaction averaged 3.58 out of 5 points. According to the results of IPA, the restaurant selection attributes that were priorities for improvement were the foods' taste and restroom cleanliness. In addition, 30.5% of respondents recognized the hygiene grade certification system for restaurants. The intention of dining at restaurants with a hygiene grade certification in the future was on average 4.02 out of 5 points. A total of 56.8% of respondents were willing to pay more for a restaurant with a hygiene grade certification. The average percentage of additional price was 6.02%. Conclusion: In order to apply and quickly disseminate the hygiene grade certification system all over the Korea, the study results suggest that relevant policy should be provided by the Korean government for certified restaurants along with the relevant education and promotion of the system to customers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park YH, Lee YK. Analysis of sanitation management practices through field assessment of large restaurants by restaurant style in Daegu and Gyeongbuk province. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2007; 36(7): 944-954. https://doi.org/10.3746/JKFN.2007.36.7.944
  2. Lee HJ, Hong WS. Importance and performance analysis of sanitation management in workers at small and medium foodservice Industries using HACCP prerequisites. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2016; 45(10): 1497-1507. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.10.1497
  3. Korean Statistical Information Service. Summary by industry and amount of sales: 2019 Number of establishment (in each), accommodation and food service activities [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01&statId=1988019&themaId=J#SelectStatsBoxDiv.
  4. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (KR); Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation. Key statistics for food industry in 2019 [Internet]. Naju: Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/article/M001040000/view.do?articleId=3283&page=&searchKey=&searchString=&searchCategory=.
  5. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (KR); Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation. 2018 food statistics (domestic, 2018) [Internet]. Naju: Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation; 2018 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: http://www.atfis.or.kr/article/M001040000/view.do?articleId=2998.
  6. aT Food Information Statistics System (KR). Food service industry statistics: number of establishments by food service business [Internet]. Naju: Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: http://www.atfis.or.kr/statistics/M003000000/main.do?category=subject#top.
  7. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). Foodborne poisoning statistics (2013-2017) [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/healthyfoodlife/foodPoisoningStat.do?menu_no=3724&menu_grp=MENU_NEW02&menu_no=3724&menu_grp=MENU_NEW02.
  8. Chung MJ, Choi JH, Ryu K, Kwak TK. Development of self-managed food sanitation check-list and on-site monitoring of food sanitation management practices in restaurants for control of foodborne illness risk factors. Korean J Food Cook Sci 2010; 26(5): 603-616.
  9. Bae HJ, Paik JE, Joo NM, Youn JY. HACCP principles and applications for foodservice manager. 2nd edition. Paju: Kyomunsa; 2017.
  10. Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services. Implementation practices of HACCP (based on Oct 2019) [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.haccp.or.kr/site/haccp/sub.do?key=2626.
  11. Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services. Introduction of hygiene rating of food service business [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Institute for Food Safety Management Accreditation; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.haccp.or.kr/site/haccp/sub.do?key=2405.
  12. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). Implementation practices of hygiene rating of food service business [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_74/view.do?seq=43672.
  13. Chung GH. The result of pilot study on hygiene grading of restaurants in 2013. Health Welf Policy Forum 2014; 209: 74-89.
  14. Cha SY, Park YI, Jeong HS. A survey of consumer importance-satisfaction on prepackaged meals (Dosirak) sold by food service providers. Korean J Food Nutr 2014; 27(1): 136-146. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.1.136
  15. Chae MJ, Bae HJ. A survey on preference and satisfaction of the customers purchasing ready-to-eat foods. Korean J Food Cook Sci 2008; 24(6): 788-800.
  16. Matzler K, Sauerwein E, Heischmidt K. Importance-performance analysis revisited: The role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. Serv Ind J 2003; 23(2): 112-129. [cited 2019 Nov 13] Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02642060412331300912.
  17. Zhang HQ, Chow I. Application of importance-performance model in tour guides performance: evidence from mainland Chinese outbound visitors in Hong Kong. J Tourism Manage 2004; 25(1): 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00064-5
  18. Kim MJ, Chong YK. The influence of macroeconomic indicators on the foodservice industry. Korean J Hosp Tour 2015; 24(3): 191-212.
  19. Suh Y, Kang J, Kim H, Chung YJ. Comparison of nutritional status of the Daejeon metropolitan citizens by frequency of eating out. Korean J Nutr 2010; 43(2): 171-180. https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2010.43.2.171
  20. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (KR). Survey on eating-out practices [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.mafra.go.kr/mafra/293/subview.do?enc=Zm5jdDF8QEB8JTJGYmJzJTJGbWFmcmElMkY2OCUyRjMyMjExMiUyRmFydGNsVmlldy5kbyUzRmJic0NsU2VxJTNEJTI2cmdzRW5kZGVTdHIlM0QlMjZiYnNPcGVuVJkU2VxJTNEJTI2cmdzQmduZGVTdHIlM0QlMjZwYXNzd29yZCUzRCUyNnNyY2hDb2x1bW4lM0RzaiUyNnJvdyUzRDEwJTI2aXNWaWV3TWluZSUzRGZhbHNlJTI2cGFnSUzRDElMjZzcmNoV3JkJTNEJUVDJTk5JUI4JUVDJThCJTlEJTI2.
  21. Mirae Asset. The age of delivery: the rise of the new distribution. Seoul: Mirae Asset; 2018.
  22. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). Delivery restaurant hygiene level I will check myself [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: http://www.mfds.go.kr/brd/m_99/view.do?seq=39574.
  23. Statistics Korea. 2018 single household in Korea [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1ES4I002S&conn_path=I2.
  24. Poushter J. Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/.
  25. Jeong KH. A study on the difference selection attributes in customer's behavior between family and business dining-out. J Tour Leisure Res 2002; 13(2): 113-128.
  26. Park JH. The importance performance analysis on small size restaurant service. J Food Service Management 2010; 13(4): 195-216.
  27. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR); Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services. Food service hygiene rating guidelines for manager [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Agency of HACCP Accreditation and Services; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.haccp.or.kr/site/haccp/boardView.do?post=92639&page=&boardSeq=883&key=2408&category=&searchType=&searchKeyword=&subContents=.
  28. Kim TH, Bae HJ. Analysis of factors affecting customer satisfaction of HACCP applied restaurant in highway service area. J Nutr Health 2017; 50(3): 294-301. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2017.50.3.294

피인용 문헌

  1. 식생활라이프스타일에 따른 배달음식의 소비성향 분석 vol.53, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.5.547
  2. 국내 주요 5성급 호텔의 위생실태 조사와 ATP 결과의 상관분석 평가 연구 vol.36, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13103/jfhs.2021.36.1.42