DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 학술지에 게재된 간호개념개발 연구의 동향

Trends of Concept Development in Nursing Published in Korean Journals

  • 이수미 (연세대학교 대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 이진혜 (연세대학교 대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 황유경 (연세대학교 대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 고일선 (연세대학교 간호대학)
  • Lee, Sumi (Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jinhae (Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hwang, Yugyeong (Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ko, Il Sun (College of Nursing, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.30
  • 심사 : 2020.01.30
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify trends of nursing concept development in Korean journal papers to improve accurate understanding of nursing concepts. Methods: A systematic review of 216 concept development articles published from 1970 to 2018 that met the inclusion criteria was conducted using Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) databases. Results: The most common method of concept development was Walker and Avant's concept analysis method, identified in 139 (64.3%) of the 216 studies, followed by 48 examples of hybrid models (22.2%) and 15 examples of evolutionary methods (6.9%). Chinn and Kramer's method, Norris's clarification, Wilson's method, and others were also used. The concepts of "spirituality" and "fatigue" were most frequently analyzed. Among the 139 studies that used Walker and Avant's concept analysis method, 127 studies (91.4%) applied all the recommended steps; the others applied the recommended steps partially, omitting description of model cases/additional cases, antecedents/consequences, and empirical indicators. Among the studies using the hybrid model, among two (5.7%) did not describe attributes, three (8.5%) did not provide definitions, and 16 (45.7%) did not present empirical indicators in the final stage. Conclusion: Among concept development studies published in Korean journals, Walker and Avant's concept analysis method is most commonly used. In case of most studies using Walker and Avant's method a suitable concept analysis process is applied, but in case of other studies using the other concept development method, a suitable concept analysis process is not applied. Therefore, a suitable concept analysis process must be applied for concept development in nursing research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. McEwan M. Philosophy, science, and nursing. In: McEwen M, Wills EM, editors. Theoretical Basis for Nursing. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 2-22.
  2. Colley S. Nursing theory: Its importance to practice. Nursing Standard. 2003;17(46):33-37. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2003.07.17.46.33.c3425
  3. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 5th Engl. Ed. Oh GS, Lee IS, Cho SY, translators. Seoul: Jungdam; c2014. p. 58-100.
  4. Yi M, Lee SW, Kim KJ, Kim MG, Kim JH, Lee KH, et al. A review study on the strategies for concept analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006;36(3):493-502. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.3.493
  5. Lee SW, Kim JH, Lee BS, Jung MS, Yoo M, Lee DS, et al. Understanding of nursing theory. 3rd ed. Seoul: Soomoonsa; 2017. p. 57-90.
  6. Morse JM. Exploring pragmatic utility: Concept analysis by critically appraising the literature. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 333-352.
  7. Rodgers BL. Concept analysis: An evolutionary view. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 77-102.
  8. Schwartz-Barcott D, Kim HS. An expansion and elaboration of the hybrid model of concept development. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 129-159.
  9. Avant KC. The Wilson method of concept analysis. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 55-76.
  10. Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 6th ed. New York: Pearson Education; 2019. p. 167-193.
  11. Chinn PL, Kramer MK. Theory and nursing: A systematic approach. 4th Engl. Ed. Kim MJ, Cho KH, translators. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; c2000. p. 83-97.
  12. Lackey NR. Concept clarification: Using the Norris method in clinical research. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 193-208.
  13. Penrod J, Hupcey JE. Enhancing methodological clarity: Principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;50(4):403-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03405.x
  14. Caron CD, Bowers BJ. Methods and application of dimensional analysis: A contribution to concept and knowledge development in nursing. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 285-319.
  15. Haase JE, Leidy NK, Coward DD, Britt T, Penn PE. Simultaneous concept analysis: A strategy for developing multiple interrelated concepts. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA, editors. Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 209-229.
  16. Hupcey JE, Penrod J. Concept analysis: Examining the state of the science. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice. 2005;19(2):197-208. https://doi.org/10.1891/rtnp.19.2.197.66801
  17. Rodgers BL, Knafl KA. Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000. p. 2-22.
  18. Rodgers BL, Jacelon CS, Knafl KA. Concept analysis and the advance of nursing knowledge: State of the science. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2018;50(4):451-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12386
  19. Chon SJ. Concept analysis: Reminiscence. The Journal of Nurses Academic Society. 1989;19(1):92-98. https://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1989.19.1.92
  20. Oh SH. Suggestions of improvements on the current academic journal evaluation system. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2012;12(4):495-509. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.04.495
  21. Lee HK, Yang K. Comparative analysis of Korean universities' journal publication research performance evaluation standards. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society. 2017;48(2):295-322. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.2.201706.295
  22. Bahr SJ, Siclovan DM, Opper K, Beiler J, Bobay KL, Weiss ME. Interprofessional health team communication about hospital discharge: An implementation science evaluation study. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2017;32(4):285-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000238
  23. Morse JM, Hupcey JE, Mitcham C, Lenz ER. Concept analysis in nursing research: A critical appraisal. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice. 1996;10(3):253-277.
  24. Cockell N, Mcsherry W. Spiritual care in nursing: An overview of published international research. Journal of Nursing Management. 2012;20(8):958-969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01450.x
  25. Ennis E, Kazer M. The role of spiritual nursing interventions on improved outcomes in older adults with dementia. Holistic Nursing Practice. 2013;27(2):106-113. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0b013e318280f7f9
  26. Yoon MO, Park JS. The effect of spiritual nursing intervention on anxiety and depression of the hospice patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing. 2002;14(3):337-347.
  27. Lee EH. Fatigue in people with cancer: Concept analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 1999;29(4):755-765. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.1999.29.4.755
  28. Seo NS, Kang SJ, Kim JH. Concept analysis of fatigue in hemodialysis patients based on hybrid model. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2017;18(7):688-698. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.7.688
  29. Jeong GH, Park HS, Kim KW, Kim YH, Lee SH, Kim HK. A concept analysis of cultural nursing competence. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2016;22(2):86-95. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.2.86
  30. Park JS. A survey for the construction of nursing theory according to Korean culture: Traditional view of human and expectation of sick role. The Journal of Nurses Academic Society. 1996;26(4):782-798. https://doi.org/10.4040/jnas.1996.26.4.782

피인용 문헌

  1. Concept Analysis of Spiritual Distress in Cancer Patients Using a Hybrid Model vol.33, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2021.33.2.169