Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Valuation Method for Redeveloped Area of Industrial Heritage

산업 유산 재생지역에 대한 가치 평가 방법에 대한 연구

  • Sun, Li (Dept. of Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University) ;
  • Pan, Young-Hwan (Dept. of Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University)
  • 쑨리 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 경험디자인학과) ;
  • 반영환 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 경험디자인학과)
  • Received : 2019.12.11
  • Accepted : 2020.02.20
  • Published : 2020.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective evaluation of the resources of industrial heritage regeneration area is an important prerequisite for design and improvement. The purpose of the study is to comprehensively evaluate the value of the industrial heritage regeneration area. This study identifies the method (model), combining the qualitative factor and quantitative factor. (1) Establish an evaluation system (AHP Hierarchy) based on the resources of regeneration area; (2) Choose an evaluation way based on the type of resource; (3) Calculate the value and total value of various resources in the area. The research is a case study of Canal 5 resort. It expounds the using process of the method and gets the rank and total value of each type of resource in this area, the factors influencing the value (mainly concerned with income), etc. The conclusion is that the value of the reclaimed land should be composed of both the use value and the non-use value; the same factor has different influence on different resources; different factors influence one resource to different extents.

산업유산 재생 지역의 자원 가치를 객관적으로 평가하는 것은 디자인 개선과 서비스 혁신의 중요한 전제 조건이다. 본 연구에서는 산업유산 재생 지역의 자원 가치를 전반적으로 평가하기 위해 정성적, 정량적 방법을 결합한 가치평가 방법(모형)을 제시하였다. (1)재생 지역의 자원에 따른 평가체계 수립(AHP 계층); (2)자원 유형에 따른 평가 코스선택(cvm 또는 사용가치); (3)해당 지역의 각 자원의 가치와 총 가치의 계산. 본 연구에서는 운하 5호 사례에 적용하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 해당 지역의 다양한 자원의 가치 순위 및 총 가치; 가치에 영향을 주는 요인은 다양하지만 주로 소득과 관련되는 것으로 나타났다. 나아가 결론은 다음과 같다. 재생지역의 가치는 사용가치와 비사용가치를 함께 구성해야 하며, 동일 요소가 서로 다른 자원의 가치에 미치는 영향이 다르다. 또한 요소별로 동일한 자원에 미치는 영향의 크기가 다르다.

Keywords

References

  1. G. J. Hospers. (2002). Industrial Heritage Tourism and Regional Restructuring in the European Union. Academic Journal of European Planning Studies, 10(3), 397-404. DOI : 10.1080/09654310220121112
  2. TICCIH. (2003, July). The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage Russian, in Proceeding of the CHARTER. European Route of Industrial Heritage [Online]. https://www.erih.net/
  3. Mechtild Rossler. (2017,October). Modern heritage and the World Heritage Convention. Newsletter of World Heritage, 85, 8-17.
  4. H. R Lee. (2019). Brief Analysis on the Experience of Activation and Utilization of Industrial Heritage in World Cultural Heritage. Journal of Low Carbon Economy, 8(1), 1-7. DOI : 10.12677/JLCE.2019.81001
  5. F. Y. Liu, Q. Zhao & Y. L Yang. (2018). An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster - Shafer theory. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 32(July-August), 210-220. DOI : 10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.011
  6. W. H. Cui & J. H. Xie. (2014). Value evaluation of liaoning industrial heritage-improvement based on CVM localization. Journal of Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, 2014(4), 39-46. DOI : CNKI:SUN:DBCD.0.2014-04-007
  7. S. V. Ciriacy-Wantrup.(1947). Capital returns from soil conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29(4), 1181-1196. DOI : 10.2307/1232747
  8. C. Tan. (2009). Application of CVM method to evaluate the non-use value of industrial heritage : a case study of Beijing coking plant site. Journal of Inner Mongolia normal university (Chinese version of natural science), 38(3), 323-328. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1001-8735.2009.03.021.
  9. W. H. Cui & F. F. Lin.(2010). Evaluation on the value of cultural heritage resources: limitations of CVM and some improvements. Journal of Resources science, 32(10), 1993-1998.
  10. G. W. Liu, Z. Zhao & Z. J. Xie. (2018). Research on the realization path of industrial heritage value from the perspective of urban renewal. Journal of Architectural economics. 39(12), 94-98. DOI : 10.14181/j.cnki.1002-851x.201812093
  11. J. M. Chen & S. B. Xu. (2018). A preliminary study on the economic value evaluation of industrial heritage cultural capital after reconstruction. Journal of Architecture and culture, 6(8), 41-43. DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4909.2018.10.007
  12. K. Li, W. Shen, Z. S. Huang & M. Cheng. (2018). Tourism resources evaluation of traditional karst settlements based on AHP and CVM-a case study of qingyan ancient town in guiyang city. Journal of mountain agricultural biology, 37(01), 50-55. DOI : 10.12677/JLCE.2019.81001
  13. M. J. Kang, Y. J. Kim, D. Y. Jo, H. J. Kim & M. S. Kim. (2011). A Study on the Design Decision-Making Supporting System Based on AHP. Journal of Advanced Materials Research. 204-210, 911-914. DOI : 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR. 204-210.911
  14. Chang zhou statistical yearbook committee. (2018. Sep. 17) Changzhou Tourism Statistics. Statistical yearbook sharing platform.
  15. M. N. Lee et al. (2012). The Current Status & Application of Contingent Value Method in China. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 74-79. DOI : 10.12677 / sd.2012.22012
  16. Y. Lee. (2001). The Technology of Questionnaire Design in the Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Environ Protec. 2001(6), 25-27. DOI : 10.16803/j.cnki.issn.1004-6216.2001.06.011
  17. Anon. (2010-2016). A picture of Canal 5. Baidu picture [Online]. zhttp://image.baidu.com.
  18. S. Z. Cheng, Y. Lei & C. Shen. (2017). Research on Regeneration Mode of British Industry Heritage Form the Perspective of Tourism. Academic Journal of Industrial Construction, 47(9), 49-53. DOI : 10.13204/j.gyjz201709011