Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.133-142
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2234-7550(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-5930(eISSN)
대한구강악안면외과학회 (The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical study on screw loosening in dental implant prostheses: a 6-year retrospective study

  • Lee, Ki-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Shin, Kyung Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Ji-Hye (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kwon, Kyung-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonkwang University Dental Hospital, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.23
  • 심사 : 2019.11.08
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: In this study, we determined the incidence and pattern of screw loosening in patients who received dental implants. Materials and Methods: Patients who received implants between January 2008 and October 2013 and completed their prosthetic rehabilitation were evaluated for the incidence, frequency, and onset of screw loosening using dental charts and radiographs. The association between each factor and screw loosening was analyzed using the chi-square test and a multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression models (P<0.05). Results: Total 1,928 implants were placed in 837 patients (448 males, 389 females), whose follow-up period after loading varied from 0.25 to 70 months (mean period, 31.5 months). Screw loosening occurred in 7.2% of implants. Most cases occurred less than six months after loading. Among those, 22.3% experienced recurrent screw loosening. Screw loosening was most common in the molar region (8.5%) and frequently associated with an implant diameter of ≥5 mm (14.2%). External implant-abutment connections (8.9%) and screw-retained implant prostheses (10.1%) showed higher incidence of problems than internal implant-abutment connections and cement-retained implants, respectively. Screw loosening was most common in implant prostheses with single crowns (14.0%). Conclusion: Within the limits of the current study, we conclude that the incidence of screw loosening differs significantly according to the position of implant placement, the type of implant and manufacturer, implant diameter, the type of implant-abutment connection, the type of retention in the implant prosthesis, and the type of implant prosthesis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Linden U, Bergstrom C, et al. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-45.
  3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9785(81)80077-4
  4. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:537-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  5. Calderon PS, Dantas PM, Montenegro SC, Carreiro AF, Oliveira AG, Dantas EM, et al. Technical complications with implantsupported dental prostheses. J Oral Sci 2014;56:179-84. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.56.179
  6. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36.
  7. Kreissl ME, Gerds T, Muche R, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01414.x
  8. Cho SC, Small PN, Elian N, Tarnow D. Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data. Implant Dent 2004;13:245-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000140459.87333.f8
  9. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:71-89.
  10. Winkler S, Ring K, Ring JD, Boberick KG. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:242-5. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0242:ISMATS>2.3.CO;2
  11. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E
  12. Carlson B, Carlsson GE. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:90-4.
  13. Kim JM, Han JS, Lee SH, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim YS. A study of screw loosening after dynamic continous fatigue test of several abutment screw. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:519-31.
  14. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  15. Cha HS, Kim YS, Jeon JH, Lee JH. Cumulative survival rate and complication rates of single-tooth implant; focused on the coronal fracture of fixture in the internal connection implant. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:595-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12065
  16. Duncan JP, Nazarova E, Vogiatzi T, Taylor TD. Prosthodontic complications in a prospective clinical trial of single-stage implants at 36 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:561-5.
  17. Lang LA, May KB, Wang RF. The effect of the use of a countertorque device on the abutment-implant complex. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:411-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80007-9
  18. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M. Effects of ethnicity, gender and age on clenching force and load distribution. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:63-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840000099
  19. Chladek W, Lipski T, Karasinski A. Experimental evaluation of occlusal forces. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2001;3:25-37.
  20. Simon RL. Single implant-supported molar and premolar crowns: a ten-year retrospective clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:517-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.025
  21. Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaws. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:415-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70155-6
  22. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:633-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90442-4
  23. Al Jabbari YS, Fournelle R, Ziebert G, Toth J, Iacopino AM. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 1: characterization of adhesive wear and structure of retaining screws. J Prosthodont 2008;17:168-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00265.x
  24. Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2
  25. Boggan RS, Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW. Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:436-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70030-2
  26. Shin HM, Huh JB, Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Chang BM, Jeong CM. Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:126-32. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.126
  27. Urdaneta RA, Rodriguez S, McNeil DC, Weed M, Chuang SK. The effect of increased crown-to-implant ratio on single-tooth lockingtaper implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:729-43.
  28. Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:75-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01545.x
  29. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94.
  30. Piermatti J, Yousef H, Luke A, Mahevich R, Weiner S. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems. Implant Dent 2006;15:427-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000245440.09464.48
  31. Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y. Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants. Dent Mater J 2009;28:373-81. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.373
  32. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28.
  33. Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1102-7.
  34. Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-60.
  35. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V, Di Martino E, Simion M. An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:448-57. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005448.x
  36. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:466-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01027.x
  37. Balshi TJ, Hernandez RE, Pryszlak MC, Rangert B. A comparative study of one implant versus two replacing a single molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:372-8.
  38. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-70.
  39. Haraldson T, Zarb G. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:243-52.
  40. Davis DM, Packer ME, Watson RM. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:521-3.
  41. Bakaeen LG, Winkler S, Neff PA. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:63-72. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO;2
  42. Sadid-Zadeh R, Kutkut A, Kim H. Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2015;59:195-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.008

피인용 문헌

  1. Abutment screw loosening in implants: A literature review vol.9, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1343_20
  2. Deep Neural Networks for Dental Implant System Classification vol.10, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10070984
  3. Management of perishing implants with abutment screw fracture - A systematic review vol.21, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_295_20
  4. Reverse Torque Values of Abutment Screws After Dynamic Loading: Effects of Sealant Agents and the Taper of Conical Connections vol.47, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00228