DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of inclination and vertical changes between single-wire and double-wire retraction techniques in lingual orthodontics

  • Hung, Bui Quang (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hong, Mihee (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yu, Wonjae (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kyung, Hee-Moon (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2019.03.28
  • Accepted : 2019.10.11
  • Published : 2020.01.25

Abstract

Objective: The Heat Induction Typodont System (HITS), used in some recent studies, has a distinct advantage over previous tooth movement simulation methods. This study aimed to compare inclination and vertical changes between the single-wire and double-wire techniques during en masse retraction with different lengths of lever arms in lingual orthodontics using an upgraded version of the HITS. Methods: Duet lingual brackets, which have two main slots, were used in this study. Forty samples were divided into four groups according to the length of the lever arm (3-mm or 6-mm hook) and the retraction wire (single-wire or double-wire). Four millimeters of en masse retraction was performed using lingual appliances. Thereafter, 3-dimensional-scanned images of the typodont were analyzed to measure inclination and vertical changes of the anterior teeth. Results: Incisor inclination presented more changes in the single-wire groups than in the double-wire groups. However, canine inclination did not differ between these groups. Regarding vertical changes, only the lateral incisors in the single-wire groups presented significantly larger values than did those in the double-wire groups. Combining the effect of hook lengths, among the four groups, the single-wire group with the 3-mm hook had the highest value, while the double-wire group with the 6-mm hook showed the least decrease in crown inclination and extrusion. Conclusions: The double-wire technique with an extended lever arm provided advantages over the single-wire technique with the same lever arm length in preventing torque loss and extrusion of the anterior teeth during en masse retraction in lingual orthodontics.

Keywords

References

  1. Lim SM, Hong RK. The Tandem Archwire technique in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2013;47:232-40; quiz 267.
  2. Lombardo L, Scuzzo G, Arreghini A, Gorgun O, Ortan YO, Siciliani G. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction. Prog Orthod 2014;15:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0038-9
  3. Hong RK, Heo JM, Ha YK. Lever-arm and miniimplant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:129-41.
  4. Hong RK, Sohn HW. Update on the Fujita lingual bracket. J Clin Orthod 1999;33:136-42.
  5. Beckwith FR, Ackerman RJ Jr, Cobb CM, Tira DE. An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:439-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70265-9
  6. Meikle MC. Guest editorial: what do prospective randomized clinical trials tell us about the treatment of class II malocclusions? A personal viewpoint. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:105-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji038
  7. Liang W, Rong Q, Lin J, Xu B. Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:316-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.039
  8. Rhee JN, Chun YS, Row J. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:292-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112452
  9. Kyung HM, Kim JY, Kyung IK. Heat Induction Typodont $System^{(R)}$ (HITS) for simulating orthodontic tooth movement. Clin J Korean Assoc Orthod 2013;3:177-9.
  10. Kim JY, Yu WJ, Koteswaracc PNK, Kyung HM. Effects of bracket slot size during en-masse retraction of the six maxillary anterior teeth using an induction-heating typodont simulation system. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:158-66. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.158
  11. Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, Sung JH, Kim IB. The lingual plain-wire system with micro-implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2004;38:388-95.
  12. Kim T, Bae G, Cho J. New indirect bonding method for lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:348-50.
  13. Lee JS, Park H, Kyung HM. Micro-implant anchorage for lingual treatment of a skeletal class II malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:643-7.
  14. Isaacson RJ, Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK. Moments with the edgewise appliance: incisor torque control. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:428-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81793-7
  15. Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:375-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjs029
  16. Jang HJ, Roh WJ, Joo BH, Park KH, Kim SJ, Park YG. Locating the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth retracted by Double J Retractor with palatal miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1023-8. https://doi.org/10.2319/121409-712.1
  17. Kim KH, Lee KJ, Cha JY, Park YC. Finite element analysis of effectiveness of lever arm in lingual sliding mechanics. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:324-36. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.5.324