DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Transcriptome analysis of Panax ginseng response to high light stress

  • Jung, Je Hyeong (Center for Natural Products Convergence Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Kim, Ho-Youn (Convergence Research Center for Smart Farm Solution, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Kim, Hyoung Seok (Center for Natural Products Convergence Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Jung, Sang Hoon (Center for Natural Products Convergence Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST))
  • Received : 2018.03.06
  • Accepted : 2018.12.24
  • Published : 2020.03.15

Abstract

Background: Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) is an essential source of pharmaceuticals and functional foods. Ginseng productivity has been compromised by high light (HL) stress, which is one of the major abiotic stresses during the ginseng cultivation period. The genetic improvement for HL tolerance in ginseng could be facilitated by analyzing its genetic and molecular characteristics associated with HL stress. Methods: Genome-wide analysis of gene expression was performed under HL and recovery conditions in 1-year-old Korean ginseng (P. ginseng cv. Chunpoong) using the Illumina HiSeq platform. After de novo assembly of transcripts, we performed expression profiling and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Furthermore, putative functions of identified DEGs were explored using Gene Ontology terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome pathway enrichment analysis. Results: A total of 438 highly expressed DEGs in response to HL stress were identified and selected from 29,184 representative transcripts. Among the DEGs, 326 and 114 transcripts were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. Based on the functional analysis, most upregulated and a significant number of downregulated transcripts were related to stress responses and cellular metabolic processes, respectively. Conclusion: Transcriptome profiling could be a strategy to comprehensively elucidate the genetic and molecular mechanisms of HL tolerance and susceptibility. This study would provide a foundation for developing breeding and metabolic engineering strategies to improve the environmental stress tolerance of ginseng.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim JH, Yi Y-S, Kim M-Y, Cho JY. Role of ginsenosides, the main active components of Panax ginseng in inflammatory responses and diseases. J Ginseng Res 2017;41:435-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2016.08.004
  2. Park TY, Hong M, Sung H, Kim S, Suk KT. Effect of Korean red ginseng in chronic liver disease. J Ginseng Res 2017;41:450-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2016.11.004
  3. Powles SB. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 1984;35:15-44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.000311
  4. Takahashi S, Badger MR. Photoprotection in plants: a new light on photosystem II damage. Trends Plant Sci 2011;16:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.001
  5. Gururani Mayank A, Venkatesh J, Tran LSP. Regulation of photosynthesis during abiotic stress-induced photoinhibition. Mol Plant 2015;8:1304-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.005
  6. Murata N, Takahashi S, Nishiyama Y, Allakhverdiev SI. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007;1767:414-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.11.019
  7. Muller P, Li X-P, Niyogi KK. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol 2001;125:1558-66. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.4.1558
  8. Ruban AV. Evolution under the sun: optimizing light harvesting in photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 2015;66:7-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru400
  9. Rossel JB, Wilson IW, Pogson BJ. Global changes in gene expression in response to high light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2002;130:1109-20. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.005595
  10. Samol I, Shapiguzov A, Ingelsson B, Fucile G, Crevecoeur M, Vener AV, Rochaix J-D, Goldschmidt-Clermont M. Identification of a photosystem II phosphatase involved in light acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012;24:2596-609. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.095703
  11. Nath K, Jajoo A, Poudyal RS, Timilsina R, Park YS, Aro E-M, Nam HG, Lee CH. Towards a critical understanding of the photosystem II repair mechanism and its regulation during stress conditions. FEBS Letters 2013;587:3372-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.09.015
  12. Jang I-B, Lee D-Y, Yu J, Park H-W, Mo H-S, Park K-C, Hyun D-Y, Lee E-H, Kim KH, Oh C-S. Photosynthesis rates, growth, and ginsenoside contents of 2-yr-old Panax ginseng grown at different light transmission rates in a greenhouse. J Ginseng Res 2015;39:345-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2015.03.007
  13. Miskell J-A, Parmenter G, Eaton-Rye JJ. Decreased Hill reaction rates and slow turnover of transitory starch in the obligate shade plant Panax quinquefolius L. (American ginseng). Planta 2002;215:969-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-002-0839-9
  14. Cheon S-G, Mok S-G, Lee S-S. Effect of light intensity and quality on the growth and quality of Korean ginseng (Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer) III. Effects of light intensity on the quality of ginseng plant. J Ginseng Res 1991;15:144-51.
  15. Parmenter G, Littlejohn R. Effect of shade on growth and photosynthesis of Panax ginseng. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 2000;28:255-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.1997.9514147
  16. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescenceda practical guide. J Exp Bot 2000;51:659-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
  17. Cox MP, Peterson DA, Biggs PJ. Solexaqa: at-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:485. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-485
  18. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008;18:821-9. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.074492.107
  19. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1086-92. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts094
  20. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 2009;10:R25. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25
  21. Kim J-E, Choe J, Lee W, Kim S, Lee M, Kim T-H, Jo S-H, Lee J. De novo gene set assembly of the transcriptome of diploid, oilseed-crop species Perilla citriodora. J Plant Biotechnol 2016;43:293-301. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2016.43.3.293
  22. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 2010;11:R106. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106
  23. Amap: Another multidimensional analysis package. R package version 0.8-12. 2014. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=amap.
  24. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000;25:25. https://doi.org/10.1038/75556
  25. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD. Large-scale gene function analysis with the panther classification system. Nat Protoc 2013;8:1551. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.092
  26. Kanehisa M, Goto S. Kegg: Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27
  27. Unamba CIN, Nag A, Sharma RK. Next generation sequencing technologies: the doorway to the unexplored genomics of non-model plants. Front Plant Sci 2015;6.
  28. Luo H, Sun C, Sun Y, Wu Q, Li Y, Song J, Niu Y, Cheng X, Xu H, Li C, et al. Analysis of the transcriptome of Panax notoginseng root uncovers putative triterpene saponin-biosynthetic genes and genetic markers. BMC Genomics 2011;12:S5.
  29. Sun C, Li Y, Wu Q, Luo H, Sun Y, Song J, Lui EMK, Chen S. De novo sequencing and analysis of the American ginseng root transcriptome using a GS FLX Titanium platform to discover putative genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 2010;11:262. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-262
  30. Rai A, Yamazaki M, Takahashi H, Nakamura M, Kojoma M, Suzuki H, Saito K. RNA-seq transcriptome analysis of Panax japonicus, and its comparison with other Panax species to identify potential genes involved in the saponins biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci 2016;7.
  31. Wang K, Jiang S, Sun C, Lin Y, Yin R, Wang Y, Zhang M. The spatial and temporal transcriptomic landscapes of ginseng, Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. Sci Rep 2015;5:18283. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18283
  32. Jayakodi M, Lee S-C, Park H-S, Jang W, Lee YS, Choi B-S, Nah GJ, Kim D-S, Natesan S, Sun C, et al. Transcriptome profiling and comparative analysis of Panax ginseng adventitious roots. J Ginseng Res 2014;38:278-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2014.05.008
  33. Cao H, Nuruzzaman M, Xiu H, Huang J, Wu K, Chen X, Li J, Wang L, Jeong J-H, Park S-J, et al. Transcriptome analysis of methyl jasmonate-elicited Panax ginseng adventitious roots to discover putative ginsenoside biosynthesis and transport genes. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:3035-57. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16023035
  34. Hihara Y, Kamei A, Kanehisa M, Kaplan A, Ikeuchi M. DNA microarray analysis of cyanobacterial gene expression during acclimation to high light. Plant Cell 2001;13:793-806. https://doi.org/10.2307/3871341
  35. Drzymalla C, Schroda M, Beck CF. Light-inducible gene HSP70b encodes a chloroplast-localized heat shock protein in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Mol Biol 1996;31:1185-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040835
  36. Barua D, Heckathorn SA. The interactive effects of light and temperature on heat-shock protein accumulation in Solidago altissima (Asteraceae) in the field and laboratory. Am J Bot 2006;93:102-9. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.1.102
  37. Schroda M, Vallon O, Wollman F-A, Beck CF. A chloroplast-targeted heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) contributes to the photoprotection and repair of photosystem II during and after photoinhibition. Plant Cell 1999;11:1165-78. https://doi.org/10.2307/3870807
  38. Stapel D, Kruse E, Kloppstech K. The protective effect of heat shock proteins against photoinhibition under heat shock in barley (Hordeum vulgare). J Photochem Photobiol B 1993;21:211-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(93)80185-C
  39. Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 2004;9:244-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006
  40. Ritossa F. A new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and DNP in Drosophila. Experientia 1962;18:571-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172188
  41. Lindquist S. Varying patterns of protein synthesis in Drosophila during heat shock: implications for regulation. Dev Biol 1980;77:463-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(80)90488-1
  42. Abarca D, Roldan M, Martin M, Sabater B. Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Cvi shows an increased tolerance to photo-oxidative stress and contains a new chloroplastic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase isoenzyme. J Exp Bot 2001;52:1417-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.360.1417
  43. Asada K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol 2006;141:391-6. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.082040
  44. Havaux M, Niyogi KK. The violaxanthin cycle protects plants from photooxidative damage by more than one mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8762-7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8762
  45. Yoshioka-Nishimura M, Nanba D, Takaki T, Ohba C, Tsumura N, Morita N, Sakamoto H, Murata K, Yamamoto Y. Quality control of photosystem II: direct imaging of the changes in the thylakoid structure and distribution of FtsH proteases in spinach chloroplasts under light stress. Plant Cell Physiol 2014;55:1255-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu079
  46. Adam Z, Frottin F, Espagne C, Meinnel T, Giglione C. Interplay between Nterminal methionine excision and FtsH protease is essential for normal chloroplast development and function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011;23:3745-60. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.087239
  47. Hutin C, Nussaume L, Moise N, Moya I, Kloppstech K, Havaux M. Early lightinduced proteins protect Arabidopsis from photooxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:4921-6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0736939100
  48. Charron J-BF, Ouellet F, Houde M, Sarhan F. The plant apolipoprotein d ortholog protects Arabidopsis against oxidative stress. BMC Plant Biol 2008;8:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-86
  49. Chen G, Bi YR, Li N. EGY1 encodes a membrane-associated and ATPindependent metalloprotease that is required for chloroplast development. Plant J 2005;41:364-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02308.x
  50. Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Franck F, Alawady AE, Dall'Osto L, Carriere F, Bassi R, Grimm B, Nussaume L, Havaux M. The light stress-induced protein ELIP2 is a regulator of chlorophyll synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2007;50:795-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03090.x
  51. Levesque-Tremblay G, Havaux M, Ouellet F. The chloroplastic lipocalin AtCHL prevents lipid peroxidation and protects Arabidopsis against oxidative stress. Plant J 2009;60:691-702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03991.x
  52. Abo-Ogiala A, Carsjens C, Diekmann H, Fayyaz P, Herrfurth C, Feussner I, Polle A. Temperature-induced lipocalin (TIL) is translocated under salt stress and protects chloroplasts from ion toxicity. J Plant Physiol 2014;171:250-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.08.003
  53. Geigenberger P. Regulation of starch biosynthesis in response to a fluctuating environment. Plant Physiol 2011;155:1566-77. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.170399
  54. Walters RG. Towards an understanding of photosynthetic acclimation. J Exp Bot 2005;56:435-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri060
  55. Yang D-H, Webster J, Adam Z, Lindahl M, Andersson B. Induction of acclimative proteolysis of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein of photosystem II in response to elevated light intensities. Plant Physiol 1998;118:827-34. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.118.3.827
  56. Derks A, Schaven K, Bruce D. Diverse mechanisms for photoprotection in photosynthesis. Dynamic regulation of photosystem II excitation in response to rapid environmental change. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015;1847:468-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.02.008
  57. Borisova-Mubarakshina MM, Ivanov BN, Vetoshkina DV, Lubimov VY, Fedorchuk TP, Naydov IA, Kozuleva MA, Rudenko NN, Dall'Osto L, Cazzaniga S, et al. Long-term acclimatory response to excess excitation energy: evidence for a role of hydrogen peroxide in the regulation of photosystem II antenna size. J Exp Bot 2015;66:7151-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv410
  58. Lucinski R, Jackowski G. Atftsh heterocomplex-mediated degradation of apoproteins of the major light harvesting complex of photosystem II (LHCII) in response to stresses. J Plant Physiol 2013;170:1082-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.03.008
  59. Liu R, Xu Y-H, Jiang S-C, Lu K, Lu Y-F, Feng X-J, Wu Z, Liang S, Yu Y-T, Wang XF, et al. Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins, positively involved in abscisic acid signalling, require a transcription repressor, WRKY40, to balance their function. J Exp Bot 2013;64:5443-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert307

Cited by

  1. RNA Sequencing Reveals That Both Abiotic and Biotic Stress-Responsive Genes are Induced during Expression of Steroidal Glycoalkaloid in Potato Tuber Subjected to Light Exposure vol.10, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110920
  2. Effects of Light on Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis in Medicinal Plants vol.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.781236
  3. Protocol Optimization of Proteomic Analysis of Korean Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) vol.8, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/separations8040053
  4. Cerium-Promoted Ginsenosides Accumulation by Regulating Endogenous Methyl Jasmonate Biosynthesis in Hairy Roots of Panax ginseng vol.26, pp.18, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185623
  5. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Roles of Anthocyanin- and Jasmonic Acid-Biosynthetic Pathways in Rapeseed in Response to High Light Stress vol.22, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222313027