Journal of KIBIM (한국BIM학회 논문집)

Korean Institute of Building Information Modeling (한국BIM학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Next Generation Smart-City Facility Platform and Digital Chain

차세대 스마트도시 시설물의 플랫폼 정의와 디지털 체인

  • 양승원 (성균관대학교 대학원 미래도시융합공학과) ;
  • 김진웅 (성균관대학교 대학원 미래도시융합공학과) ;
  • 김성아 (성균관대학교 건축학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.16
  • Accepted : 2020.12.17
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With increasing interest and research on smart cities, there is also an increasing number of studies on urban facilities that can be built within smart cities. According to these studies, smart cities' urban facilities are likely to become high value-added industries. However, the concept of smart city is not clear because it involves various fields. Therefore, in this study, the definition of Next-Generation(N.G) Smart City Facilities with Digital Twin and Digital Chain is carried out through a multidisciplinary approach. Based on this, Next-Generation Smart City Facilities will be divided into High Value-Added Products and Big Data Platforms. Subsequently, the definition of the Digital Chain containing the data flow of the entire process built through the construction of the Digital Twin proceeds. The definitions derived are applied to the Next-Generation Noise Barrier Tunnel to ensure that data is exchanged at the Digital Twin stage, and to review the proposed configuration of the Digital Chain and Data Flow in this study. The platform definition and Digital Chain of Next-Generation Smart City Facilities proposed in this study suggest that it can affect not only the aspects of data management that are currently in the spotlight, but also the manufacturing industry as a whole.

Keywords

References

  1. Baldwin, C. Y., Woodard, C, J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: a unified view, Gawer Annabelle (ed), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Edward Elgar, pp. 19-44.
  2. Caragliu et al. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe, Journal of Urban Technology, Volume 18, pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
  3. Cho, Y. (2016). Criteria for smart cities; smart city indexes. Science & Technology Policy, 26(8), pp. 38-43.
  4. Cho, Y., S.-A. Kim (2010). The Implementation for the Spatially-mediated Social networking service Scenarios in Intelligent Street, Journal of the Architecture Institute of Korea, 30(1), pp. 99-100.
  5. Choi, B. (2011). A Study of the Effect of the General Definition of Platforms on the Firm's Economic and Strategy Decision-Making, The Journal of Business Education,25(3), pp. 165-167.
  6. Grieves, M. W. (2019). Virtually Intelligent Product Systems: Digital and Physical Twins, Complex Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice 7, pp. 177.
  7. Grieves, M., Vickers, J. Digital Twin:Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Beahaviorin Complex Systems, in Kahlen, F., Flumerfelt, S., Alves. A. (2017). Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer, pp. 85-113.
  8. Hagiu, A. (2014). Strategic decisions for multisided platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review.
  9. https://documents.hants.gov.uk/hampshire2050/evidence/theme-4-environment-and-quality-of-place/supportingevidence-and-research-reports/Theme-4-Its-Alive-Arup-Foresight.pdf, pp. 4 (July. 15. 2020).
  10. IDC (2015). Digital transformation (DX): An opportunity and an imperative. IDC Executive Brief.
  11. Jung, J., S.-A. Kim (2018). Digital Fabrication Integrated Architectural Design Process based on Lean startup. KIBIM Magazine 8: pp. 23-33.
  12. KICT. (2014). Development of Urban Spatial Information Platform for Urban Public Facility Management based on Sensing Data
  13. Kim, J., S-A, Kim (2019). Prototyping-based Design Process Integrated with Digital-Twin: A Fundamental Study, KIBIM Magazine 9(4): pp. 58-60.
  14. Lee, B. (2018). The Concept of Smart Urban Facilities and the Direction of Linkage with Urban Regeneration. KRIHS, 664, pp. 3-6.
  15. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H-A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing letters 3, pp. 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
  16. Lee, S. (2016). Analyzing Characteristics of the Smart City Governance, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 19(2), pp. 86-87. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2016.19.2.086
  17. Lim, S. (2018). Application of Digital Twin for the Success of Smart City. KRIHS, 687, pp. 1-6.
  18. Mark, D. (2011). From intelligent to smart cities, Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), pp. 140-152 https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2011.586671
  19. OECD(2016). Big data: Bringing competition policy to the digital era, Directorate for Financial & Enterprise Affairs Competition Committee, https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2016)14/en/pdf, pp. 12. (July. 7. 2020).
  20. Park, Y. (2018). Strategy for Building Smart City as a Platform of the 4th Industrial Revolution, Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(1), pp. 173-175.
  21. Piascik, R., Vickers, J., Lowry, D., Scotti, S., Stewart, J., Calomino, A. (2010). Technology area 12: Materials, structures, mechanical systems, and manufacturing roadmap. NASA Office of Chief Technologist. pp. 15-88.
  22. Sakong, H. (2018). Strategies to Build 'Digital Twin Space' (DTS) Towards the Fourth Industrial Revolution. KRIHS, 661, pp. 4-6.
  23. Schallmo, D. R., Williams, C. A. (2018). Digital Transformation Now! Guiding the Successful.
  24. Shin, D., S.-A. Kim (2007). A Methodology to Introduce the Digital Chain into the Education of Computer Aided Architectural Design, Journal of the Architecture Institute of Korea, 30(1), pp. 181.
  25. Yoo, J. (2015), A Study on the Utilization of Sensor Information for Urban Facility Masters Thesis, ANYANG UNIVERSITY of Urban Information Engineering.
  26. Yoon, J. (2016). A Study on the Design Development of Public Facility Considering Urban Design, Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 22(1), pp. 275-276.