Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.223-231
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of probabilistic hazard for Bingol province, Turkey

  • Balun, Bilal (Centre for Energy the Environment and Natural Disasters and Department of Architecture, Bingol University) ;
  • Nemutlu, Omer Faruk (Centre for Energy the Environment and Natural Disasters and Department of Civil Engineering, Bingol University) ;
  • Benli, Ahmet (Department of Civil Engineering, Bingol University) ;
  • Sari, Ali (Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.12
  • 심사 : 2019.12.25
  • 발행 : 2020.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Due to the fact that Bingöl province is at the intersection of the North Anatolian Fault and the Eastern Anatolian Fault, the seismicity of the region is important. In this study, probabilistic seismic hazard analyzes (PSHA) were conducted to cover the boundaries of Bingöl province. It occurred since 1900, the seismicity of the region was obtained statistically by considering the earthquake records with a magnitude greater than 4 and the Gutenberg-Richter correlation. In the study, magnitude-frequency relationship, seismic hazard and repetition periods were obtained for certain time periods (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75 and 100 years). Once a project area determined in this study, which may affect the peak ground acceleration according to various attenuation relationships are calculated and using the Turkey Earthquake Hazard Map, average acceleration value for Bingöl province were determined. As a result of the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, the project earthquakes with a probability of exceeding 50 years indicate that the magnitude of the project earthquake is 7.4 and that the province is in a risky area in terms of seismicity. The repetition periods of earthquakes of 6.0, 6.5, 7.0 and 7.5 are 42, 105, 266 and 670 years respectively. Within the province of Bingöl; the probability of exceeding 50 years is 2%, 10% and 50%, while the peak ground acceleration values are 1.03 g, 0.58 g and 0.24 g. As a result, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis shows that the seismicity of the region is high and the importance of considering the earthquake effect during construction is emphasized for this region.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akkar, S. and Cagnan, Z. (2010), "A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey, and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100(6), 2978-2995. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090367.
  2. Akkar, S., Boore, D.M. and Gulkan, P. (2005), "An evaluation of the strong ground motion recorded during the May 1, 2003 Bingol Turkey, earthquake", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(2), 173-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350538.
  3. Anbazhagan, P., Vinod, J.S. and Sitharam, T.G. (2009). "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore", Nat. Hazard., 48(2), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9253-3.
  4. Andric, J.M. and Lu, D.G. (2017), "Fuzzy probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with applications to Kunming city, China", Nat. Hazard., 89(3), 1031-1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3007-z.
  5. Ashadi, A.L., Harmoko, U., Yuliyanto, G. and Kaka, S.I. (2015), "Probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis for central Java Province, Indonesia", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 105(3), 1711-1720. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140277.
  6. Ayele, A. (2017), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for Ethiopia and the neighboring region", J. Afr. Earth Sci., 134, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.06.016.
  7. Bwambale, B., Bagampadde, U., Gidudu, A. and Martini, F. (2015), "Seismic hazard analysis for the Albertine Region, Uganda - a probabilistic approach", S. Afr. J. Geol., 118(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssajg.118.4.411.
  8. Ceken, U., Beyhan, G. and Selim, H.H. (2014), "City of Bingol in May 2003: Assessment of strong ground motion records", J. Earth Syst. Sci., 123(2), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0394-8.
  9. Celep, Z. and Kumbasar, N. (2004), "Deprem muhendisligine giris ve depreme dayanikli yapi tasarimi", Beta Dagitim, Istanbul.
  10. Celep, Z., Erken, A., Taskin, B. and Ilki, A. (2011), "Failures of masonry and concrete buildings during the March 8, 2010 Kovancilar and Palu (Elazig) earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 18(3), 868-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.001.
  11. De, Almeida, A.A.D., Assumpcao, M., Bommer, J.J., Drouet, S., Riccomini, C. and Prates, C.L.M. (2019), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for a nuclear power plant site in southeast Brazil", J. Seismol., 23(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-018-9755-8.
  12. Dogangun, A. (2004), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingol earthquake in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 26(6), 841-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.005.
  13. Gorgun, B. and Ural, N. (2018), "Determination of seismicity of Bilecik City center", El-Cezeri J. Sci. Eng., 5(2), 394-402. (in Turkish)
  14. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F. (1944), "Frequency of earthquakes in California", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34(4), 185-188. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185
  15. Harman, E.K. (2016), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the city of Sakarya", Sakarya Uni. J. Sci., 20(1), 23-31. (in Turkish)
  16. Ince, Y. and Kurnaz, T.F. (2018), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Kahramanmaras Province, Turkey", Arab. J. Geosci., 11(5), 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3434-5.
  17. Isik, E., Aydin, M.C., Bakis, A. and Ozluk, M.H. (2012), "The faults near bitlisand seismicity of the region", EU. J. Sci., 1(2), 153-169.
  18. Kalyoncuoglu, U.Y. and Ozer, M.F. "Seismicity of Turkey, tectonics and high-risk areas a new approach, in Turkish", Proc., Earth Symposium.
  19. Karaca, H. (2017), "Obtaining seismic hazard map and response spectrum curve by using the latest data andprobabilistic seismic hazard analysis", J. Facult. Eng. Arch. Gazi Uni., 32(1), 265-273. (in Turkish)
  20. Kartal, R.F., Beyhan, G. and Keskinsezer, A. (2014), "Seismic hazard analysis of Sinop province, Turkey using probabilistic and statistical methods", J. Earth Syst. Sci., 123(3), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014-0424-1.
  21. Kartal, R.F., Beyhan, G., Keskinsezer, A. and Kadirioglu, F.T. (2014), "Seismic hazard analysis of Mersin Province, Turkey using probabilistic and statistical methods", Arab. J. Geosci., 7(10), 4443-4459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1104-1.
  22. Kayabali, K. (1995), "Seismic hazard analysis; theory and application", J. Geo. Eng., 46(1), 28-43.
  23. Mahmoudi, M., Shayanfar, M., Barkhordari, M.A. and Jahani, E. (2016), "New fuzzy method in choosing ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis", Earthq. Struct., 10(2), 389-408. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.389.
  24. Mahsuli, M., Rahimi, H. and Bakhshi, A. (2019), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Iran using reliability methods", Bull. Earthq. Eng, 17(3), 1117-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0498-2.
  25. Mantyniemi, P., Marza, V.I., Kijko, A. and Retief, P. (2003), "A new probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Vrancea (Romania) seismogenic zone", Nat. Hazard., 29(3), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024787621646.
  26. Milkereit, C., Grosser, H., Wang, R.J., Wetzel, H.U., Woith, H., Karakisa, S., Zunbul, S. and Zschau, J. (2004), "Implications of the 2003 Bingol earthquake for the interaction between the north and east anatolian faults", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94(6), 2400-2406. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030194.
  27. Mulargia, F., Stark, P.B. and Geller, R.J. (2017), "Why is probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) still used?", Phys. Earth Planet Inter., 264, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2016.12.002.
  28. Naidu, G.D., Selvan, S., Tripathy, G.R. and Pattanur, L.R. (2018), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Jabalpur area, Madhya Pradesh, India", J. Ind. Geophys. Uni., 22(4), 389-398.
  29. P.M.D.E.M. Authority (2019), Turkey Earthquake Hazard Maps.
  30. Pailoplee, S. and Charusiri, P. (2016), "Seismic hazards in Thailand: a compilation and updated probabilistic analysis", Earth Planet Space, 68(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0465-6.
  31. Rangin, C., Bader, A.G., Pascal, G., Ecevitoglu, B. and Gorur, N. (2002), "Deep structure of the Mid Black Sea High (offshore Turkey) imaged by multi-channel seismic survey (BLACKSIS cruise)", Marin. Geol., 182(3-4), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00236-5.
  32. Rehman, S.U., Khalid, M., Ali, A. and Abd El-Aal, A.K. (2013), "Deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Gwadar City, Pakistan", Arab. J. Geosci., 6(9), 3481-3492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0635-1.
  33. Sayin, E., Yon, B., Calayir, Y. and Gor, M. (2014), "Construction failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the 2011 Van earthquakes in Turkey", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(3), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.503.
  34. Sayin, E., Yon, B., Calayir, Y. and Karaton, M. (2013), "Failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the June 23, 2011 Maden-(Elazig) earthquake in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 34, 779-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.016.
  35. Sezer, L.I. (2008), "Seismicity in the Karliova (Bingol) Region", Aegean Geogr. J., 17(1-2), 35-50.
  36. Sil, A., Sitharam, T.G. and Kolathayar, S. (2013), "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Tripura and Mizoram states", Nat. Hazard., 68(2), 1089-1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0678-y.
  37. Sokolov, V., Zahran, H.M., Youssef, S.E., El-Hadidy, M. and Alraddadi, W.W. (2017), "Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Saudi Arabia using spatially smoothed seismicity and analysis of hazard uncertainty", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 15(7), 2695-2735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0075-5.
  38. Ulusay, R. and Aydan, O. (2005), "Characteristics and geo-engineering aspects of the 2003 Bingol (Turkey) earthquake", J. Geodyn., 40(2-3), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2005.07.018.
  39. Yucemen, M.S. (2011), "Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: general overview and considerations in statistical modeling", 1st Turkey Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Confenerence, Ankara, Turkey, October.

피인용 문헌

  1. Damage assessment of buildings after 24 January 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake vol.20, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.3.325
  2. Seismic and Structural Analyses of the Eastern Anatolian Region (Turkey) Using Different Probabilities of Exceedance vol.4, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4040089