DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systems Engineering Approach to Predict the Success Window of FLEX Strategy under Extended SBO Using Artificial Intelligence

  • Alketbi, Salama Obaid (Nuclear Engineering Department, KEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School) ;
  • Diab, Aya (Nuclear Engineering Department, KEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School)
  • Received : 2020.10.13
  • Accepted : 2020.11.24
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

On March 11, 2011, an earthquake followed by a tsunami caused an extended station blackout (SBO) at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP Units. The accident was initiated by a total loss of both onsite and offsite electrical power resulting in the loss of the ultimate heat sink for several days, and a consequent core melt in some units where proper mitigation strategies could not be implemented in a timely fashion. To enhance the plant's coping capability, the Diverse and Flexible Strategies (FLEX) were proposed to append the Emergency Operation Procedures (EOPs) by relying on portable equipment as an additional line of defense. To assess the success window of FLEX strategies, all sources of uncertainties need to be considered, using a physics-based model or system code. This necessitates conducting a large number of simulations to reflect all potential variations in initial, boundary, and design conditions as well as thermophysical properties, empirical models, and scenario uncertainties. Alternatively, data-driven models may provide a fast tool to predict the success window of FLEX strategies given the underlying uncertainties. This paper explores the applicability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to identify the success window of FLEX strategy for extended SBO. The developed model can be trained and validated using data produced by the lumped parameter thermal-hydraulic code, MARS-KS, as best estimate system code loosely coupled with Dakota for uncertainty quantification. A Systems Engineering (SE) approach is used to plan and manage the process of using AI to predict the success window of FLEX strategies under extended SBO conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. INCOSE (2015) Systems Engineering Handbook. 4th Edition, Edited by T. M. S. David D. Walden, Garry J. Roedler, Kevin J. Forsberg, R. Douglas Hamelin. Hoboken, New Jersey.
  2. J. Ricardo Tavares de Sousa, Aya Diab "Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty Analysis for SBO", Presented at the 2019 ANS Winter Meeting and Expo, 2019.
  3. Lee, S. W., Hong, T. H., Seo, M. R., Lee, Y. S., & Kim, H. T. (2014). Extended station blackout coping capabilities of APR1400. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2014.
  4. T.V. Santosh, et al., "Diagnostic system for identification of accident scenarios in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, pp. 759-762, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.08.005
  5. Vinod, S. G., Babar, A., Kushwaha, H., Raj, V. V. (2003). Symptom-based diagnostic system for nuclear power plant operations using artificial neural networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 82(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00120-0
  6. Saghafi, M., Ghofrani, M. B. (2016). Accident management support tools in nuclear power plants: A post-Fukushima review. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 92, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.06.006
  7. Fernandez, M. G., Tokuhiro, A., Welter, K., and; Wu, Q. (2017). Nuclear energy system's behavior and decision-making using machine learning. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 324, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.08.020
  8. Gharam, D. (2020). Machine Learning analysis of text in a Clinical Decision Support System,
  9. Ryan, M. J., & Wheatcraft, L. S. (2017). On the Use of the Terms Verification and Validation. INCOSE International Symposium, 27(1), 1277-1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00427.x