DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Classifying Types of Local Governments for Urban Policies in the Metropolitan Era

대도시권 시대의 도시정책을 위한 기초지자체 유형 구분

  • 김근영 (강남대학교 부동산건설학부)
  • Received : 2020.11.18
  • Accepted : 2020.12.30
  • Published : 2020.12.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a plan to distinguish 229 local governments nationwide by taking into account various characteristics such as population, employment, housing, and industry of the region for customized urban policies in the era of metropolitan areas. The National Statistical Portal (KOSIS) collected and standardized data related to population, housing, industry, and finance by region from 2000 to 2015 for the classification of regional types necessary for customized urban policies, and this was used to classify them into regional types that considered population, employment, housing and industry. The summary of the analysis results is as follows. First, as a result of the regional type classification, 10 key employment sites (4.4%), 5 employment centers (2.2%), 38 residential centers (16.6%), 20 growth areas (8.7%), 26 industrial cities (11.4%), 35 low-fertile farming and fishing villages (15.3%) and 95 stagnant areas (41.5%). Second, the Seoul metropolitan area is the most diverse type of metropolitan area in the country, with most of its core employment sites inside Seoul, residential centers inside and outside Seoul, and growth areas in the southeastern part of the country (Busan, Ulsan, and Gyeongsangnam-do) are mixed with industrial and growth areas centered around Busan, Ulsan and surrounding areas, while the rest of the local governments are found to be low-fertile farming villages or stagnant areas. Daegu (Daegu, Gyeongbuk) is an industrial city in Daegu, and the rest of the local governments are either low-density farming and fishing villages or stagnant areas. The Honam region (Gwangju and Jeolla) was found to be a low-mill farming and fishing village or stagnant area except for Gwangju, while the Chungcheong region (Daejeon, Sejong, and Chungcheong) was seen as a growth area with areas adjacent to Daejeon, Sejong, and the Seoul metropolitan area, and some industrial cities were included. Finally, the Gangwon area was mostly classified as low-density farming and fishing villages and stagnant areas.

Keywords

References

  1. 김홍배, 문동주, 박준화. (2008). 지역진단 지표개발과 지역발전방향에 관한 연구. 국토계획, 43(1), 183-196.
  2. 도시재생사업단, (2010) 한국도시쇠퇴의 실태와 특성, 토론회 발표자료
  3. 송민경, 장훈. (2010). 군집분석을 이용한 수도권 도시의 유형화에 관한 연구. , 18(1), 83-88.
  4. 이보경, (2019) 2040 장래인구 분포 전망 연구. 국토연구원
  5. 이원섭, (2003). 국가지원의 지역간 차등화를 위한 지역유형 구분 방안에 관한 연구, 국토연구, 36, 19-35
  6. 이원호, (2006), 우리나라 낙후지역의 유형구분 및 개발수요의 분석, 응용지리, 27, 47-62
  7. 이원호, 안영진. (2011). 지역 맞춤형 낙후지역 정책을 위한 지역 유형구분 및 특성 분석. 한국지역지리학회지, 17(1), 96-108.
  8. 임석회. (2018). 인구감소도시의 유형과 지리적 특성 분석. , 52(1), 65-84.