DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: technical advances

  • Isagulyan, Emil (Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Institution (N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation)) ;
  • Slavin, Konstantin (Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago) ;
  • Konovalov, Nikolay (Department of Spinal Surgery, Federal State Autonomous Institution (N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation)) ;
  • Dorochov, Eugeny (Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Institution (N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation)) ;
  • Tomsky, Alexey (Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Institution (N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation)) ;
  • Dekopov, Andrey (Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Institution (N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center for Neurosurgery of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation)) ;
  • Makashova, Elizaveta (Departament of Neurology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University) ;
  • Isagulyan, David (Departament of Clinical Science, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University) ;
  • Genov, Pavel (Pain Management Clinic, Moscow City Clinical Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2019.12.31
  • 심사 : 2020.02.03
  • 발행 : 2020.04.01

초록

Chronic severe pain results in a detrimental effect on the patient's quality of life. Such patients have to take a large number of medications, including opioids, often without satisfactory effect, sometimes leading to medication abuse and the pain worsening. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is one of the most effective technologies that, unlike other interventional pain treatment methods, achieves long-term results in patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain. The first described mode of SCS was a conventional tonic stimulation, but now the novel modalities (high-frequency and burst), techniques (dorsal root ganglia stimulations), and technical development (wireless and implantable pulse generator-free systems) of SCS are becoming more popular. The improvement of SCS systems, their miniaturization, and the appearance of new mechanisms for anchoring electrodes results in a significant reduction in the rate of complications and revision surgeries, and the appearance of new waves of stimulation allows not only to avoid the phenomenon of addiction, but also to improve the long-term results of chronic SCS. The purpose of this review is to describe the current condition of SCS and up-to-date technical advances.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Torrance N, Ferguson JA, Afolabi E, Bennett MI, Serpell MG, Dunn KM, et al. Neuropathic pain in the community: more under-treated than refractory? Pain 2013; 154: 690-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.022
  2. Shoskes DA, Katz E. Multimodal therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Curr Urol Rep 2005; 6: 296-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-005-0027-0
  3. Peckham AM, Fairman KA, Sclar DA. Prevalence of gabapentin abuse: comparison with agents with known abuse potential in a commercially insured US population. Clin Drug Investig 2017; 37: 763-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0530-3
  4. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965; 150: 971-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3699.971
  5. Vannemreddy P, Slavin KV. Spinal cord stimulation: current applications for treatment of chronic pain. Anesth Essays Res 2011; 5: 20-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.84174
  6. Krames ES, Foreman R. Spinal cord stimulation modulates visceral nociception and hyperalgesia via the spinothalamic tracts and the postsynaptic dorsal column pathways: a literature review and hypothesis. Neuromodulation 2007; 10: 224-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00112.x
  7. Ultenius C, Song Z, Lin P, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. Spinal GABAergic mechanisms in the effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rodent model of neuropathic pain: is GABA synthesis involved? Neuromodulation 2013; 16: 114-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12007
  8. Jeon YH. Spinal cord stimulation in pain management: a review. Korean J Pain 2012; 25: 143-50. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2012.25.3.143
  9. Cook AW. Letter: percutaneous trial for implantable stimulating devices. J Neurosurg 1976; 44: 650-1.
  10. Lind AL, Emami Khoonsari P, Sjodin M, Katila L, Wetterhall M, Gordh T, et al. Spinal cord stimulation alters protein levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of neuropathic pain patients: a proteomic mass spectrometric analysis. Neuromodulation 2016; 19: 549-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12473
  11. Slavin KV. Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications. Neurotherapeutics 2014; 11: 535-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-014-0273-2
  12. Shim JH. Spinal cord stimulation: panacea for incurable diseases? Korean J Anesthesiol 2013; 65: 103-4. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.2.103
  13. Smith BH, Torrance N, Ferguson JA, Bennett MI, Serpell MG, Dunn KM. Towards a definition of refractory neuropathic pain for epidemiological research. An international Delphi survey of experts. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-29
  14. Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, et al. Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a prospective two-center randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 3016-24. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0684
  15. Zipes DP, Svorkdal N, Berman D, Boortz-Marx R, Henry T, Lerman A, et al. Spinal cord stimulation therapy for patients with refractory angina who are not candidates for revascularization. Neuromodulation 2012; 15: 550-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00452.x
  16. Ozdemir I, Akbas M, Yegin A, Dagistan G, Erkan DO. [Spinal cord stimulation in 62 patients: retrospective evaluation]. Agri 2017; 29: 25-32. Turkish.
  17. Kapural L, Nagem H, Tlucek H, Sessler DI. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic visceral abdominal pain. Pain Med 2010; 11: 347-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00785.x
  18. Kapural L, Cywinski JB, Sparks DA. Spinal cord stimulation for visceral pain from chronic pancreatitis. Neuromodulation 2011; 14: 423-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00381.x
  19. Isagulyan ED, Shabalov VA. Chronic electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Hir Pozvonoc 2014; 3: 41-8. Russian.
  20. Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 152-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000149199.68381.fe
  21. Kumar K, North R, Taylor R, Sculpher M, Van den Abeele C, Gehring M, et al. Spinal cord stimulation vs. conventional medical management: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS study). Neuromodulation 2005; 8: 213-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2005.00027.x
  22. Imran TF, Malapero R, Qavi AH, Hasan Z, de la Torre B, Patel YR, et al. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunct therapy for chronic refractory angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol 2017; 227: 535-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.105
  23. Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation 2014; 17: 515-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12208
  24. Slangen R, Faber CG, Schaper NC, Joosten EA, van Dongen RT, Kessels AG, et al. A trial-based economic evaluation comparing spinal cord stimulation with best medical treatment in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain 2017; 18: 405-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.014
  25. Duarte RV, Andronis L, Lenders MW, de Vos CC. Quality of life increases in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy following treatment with spinal cord stimulation. Qual Life Res 2016; 25: 1771-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1211-4
  26. van Beek M, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, et al. Sustained treatment effect of spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: 24-month follow-up of a prospective two-center randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: e132-4. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0740
  27. Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors. Eur J Pain 2006; 10: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004
  28. Stanton-Hicks M. Complex regional pain syndrome: manifestations and the role of neurostimulation in its management. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006; 31(4 Suppl): S20-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.011
  29. Barolat G, Oakley JC, Law JD, North RB, Ketcik B, Sharan A. Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain. Neuromodulation 2001; 4: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00059.x
  30. North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000144839.65524.e0
  31. Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med 2014; 15: 347-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12294
  32. Deer T, Slavin KV, Amirdelfan K, North RB, Burton AW, Yearwood TL, et al. Success Using Neuromodulation with BURST (SUNBURST) study: results from a prospective, randomized controlled trial using a novel burst waveform. Neuromodulation 2018; 21: 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12698
  33. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery 2016; 79: 667-77. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418
  34. Thomson SJ, Tavakkolizadeh M, Love-Jones S, Patel NK, Gu JW, Bains A, et al. Effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the PROCO randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation 2018; 21: 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746
  35. De Andres J, Monsalve-Dolz V, Fabregat-Cid G, Villanueva-Perez V, Harutyunyan A, Asensio-Samper JM, et al. Prospective, randomized blind effect-on-outcome study of conventional vs high-frequency spinal cord stimulation in patients with pain and disability due to failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 2017; 18: 2401-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx241
  36. Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, Pang D, Lam K, Burgoyne W, et al. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective, open label and proof-of-concept study. Neuromodulation 2017; 20: 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12563
  37. Kinfe TM, Pintea B, Link C, Roeske S, Guresir E, Guresir A, et al. High frequency (10 kHz) or burst spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant back pain: preliminary data from a prospective observational study. Neuromodulation 2016; 19: 268-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12379
  38. Muhammad S, Roeske S, Chaudhry SR, Kinfe TM. Burst or high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant back pain: one year comparative data. Neuromodulation 2017; 20: 661-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12611
  39. Lambru G, Trimboli M, Palmisani S, Smith T, Al-Kaisy A. Safety and efficacy of cervical 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory primary headaches: a retrospective case series. J Headache Pain 2016; 17: 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0657-2
  40. Arcioni R, Palmisani S, Mercieri M, Vano V, Tigano S, Smith T, et al. Cervical 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic, medically refractory migraine: a prospective, open-label, exploratory study. Eur J Pain 2016; 20: 70-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.692
  41. Arle JE, Mei L, Carlson KW, Shils JL. High-frequency stimulation of dorsal column axons: potential underlying mechanism of paresthesia-free neuropathic pain relief. Neuromodulation 2016; 19: 385-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12436
  42. Cuellar JM, Alataris K, Walker A, Yeomans DC, Antognini JF. Effect of high-frequency alternating current on spinal afferent nociceptive transmission. Neuromodulation 2013; 16: 318-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12015
  43. Russo M, Verrills P, Mitchell B, Salmon J, Barnard A, Santarelli D. High frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of chronic pain: 6-month Australian clinical experience. Pain Physician 2016; 19: 267-80.
  44. Hou S, Kemp K, Grabois M. A systematic evaluation of burst spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and limb pain. Neuromodulation 2016; 19: 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12440
  45. Kriek N, Groeneweg G, Huygen FJ. Burst spinal cord stimulation in a patient with complex regional pain syndrome: a 2-year follow-up. Pain Pract 2015; 15: E59-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12295
  46. De Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, Menovsky T, Vanneste S. Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain. World Neurosurg 2013; 80: 642-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.040
  47. Schu S, Slotty PJ, Bara G, von Knop M, Edgar D, Vesper J. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 2014; 17: 443-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12197
  48. Julius D, Basbaum AI. Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature 2001; 413: 203-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/35093019
  49. Scholz J, Woolf CJ. The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 1361-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1992
  50. Deer TR, Levy RM, Kramer J, Poree L, Amirdelfan K, Grigsby E, et al. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial. Pain 2017; 158: 669-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000814
  51. Eldabe S, Burger K, Moser H, Klase D, Schu S, Wahlstedt A, et al. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation in the treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP). Neuromodulation 2015; 18: 610-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12338
  52. Weiner RL, Yeung A, Montes Garcia C, Tyler Perryman L, Speck B. Treatment of FBSS low back pain with a novel percutaneous DRG wireless stimulator: pilot and feasibility study. Pain Med 2016; 17: 1911-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnw075
  53. Russo M, Cousins MJ, Brooker C, Taylor N, Boesel T, Sullivan R, et al. Effective relief of pain and associated symptoms with closed-loop spinal cord stimulation system: preliminary results of the Avalon study. Neuromodulation 2018; 21: 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12684
  54. Bolash R, Creamer M, Rauck R, Vahedifar P, Calodney A, Fox I, et al. Wireless high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz) compared with multiwaveform low-frequency spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic pain in failed back surgery syndrome subjects: preliminary results of a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled study. Pain Med 2019; 20: 1971-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz019
  55. Duarte RV, Nevitt S, McNicol E, Taylor RS, Buchser E, North RB, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo/sham controlled randomised trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain. Pain 2020; 161: 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001689
  56. Deer TR, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Slavin K, et al. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) safety guidelines for the reduction of severe neurological injury. Neuromodulation 2017; 20: 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12564
  57. Deer TR, Provenzano DA, Hanes M, Pope JE, Thomson SJ, Russo MA, et al. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) recommendations for infection prevention and management. Neuromodulation 2017; 20: 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12565
  58. Deer TR, Narouze S, Provenzano DA, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Russo MA, et al. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC): recommendations on bleeding and coagulation management in neurostimulation devices. Neuromodulation 2017; 20: 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12542
  59. Roth SG, Lange S, Haller J, De La Cruz P, Kumar V, Wilock M, et al. A prospective study of the intra- and postoperative efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring in spinal cord stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2015; 93: 348-54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437388

피인용 문헌

  1. Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Time to Reconsider the Skeptical Attitude? vol.10, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110772
  2. An Italian Expert Consensus on the Use of Opioids for the Management of Chronic Non-Oncological Pain in Clinical Practice: Focus on Buprenorphine. vol.14, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s314206
  3. Successful application of burst spinal cord stimulation for refractory upper limb pain: a case series vol.49, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211004035
  4. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review vol.10, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00279-4
  5. Neuromodulation Applications for Chronic Pain vol.15, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052123