DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Earthquake risk assessment of underground railway station by fragility analysis based on numerical simulation

  • Kwon, Sun Yong (Division of Resources and Energy Assessment, Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Yoo, Mintaek (Railroad Structure Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Hong, Seongwon (Department of Safety Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • Received : 2019.12.11
  • Accepted : 2020.03.02
  • Published : 2020.04.25

Abstract

Korean society experienced successive earthquakes exceeding 5.0 magnitude in the past three years resulting in an increasing concern about earthquake stability of urban infrastructures. This study focuses on the significant aspects of earthquake risk assessment for the cut-and-cover underground railway station based on two-dimensional dynamic numerical analysis. Presented are features from a case study performed for the railway station in Seoul, South Korea. The PLAXIS2D was employed for numerical simulation and input of the earthquake ground motion was chosen from Pohang earthquake records (M5.4). The paper shows key aspects of earthquake risk for soil-structure system varying important parameters including embedded depth, supported ground information, and applied seismicity level, and then draws several meaningful conclusions from the analysis results such as seismic risk assessment.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Environment Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)

This research was supported by a grant from the Review of Environmental Impact Assessment funded by Korea Environment Institute, the R&D Program (PK2002A4) of the Korea Railroad Research Institute, Republic of Korea, and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2018R1A4A1025953) and this was supported by Korea National University of Transportation in 2020.

References

  1. ALA (2001), Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems Part 1 - Guideline, American Society of Civil Engineers - FEMA, Chicago, U.S.A.
  2. Andreotti, G. and Carlo, G. (2014), "Seismic vulnerability of deep tunnels: Numerical modeling for a fully nonlinear dynamic analysis", Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Instanbul, Turkey, August.
  3. Andreotti, G., Lai, C.G. and Martinelli, M. (2013), "Seismic fragility functions of deep tunnels: a new cumulative damage model based on lumped plasticity and rotation capacity", Proceedings of the International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, June.
  4. Argyroudis, S.A. and Pitilakis, K.D. (2012), "Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 35, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004.
  5. Corigliano, M., Lai, C.G. and Barla, G. (2007), "Seismic vulnerability of rock tunnels using fragility curves", Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Rock Mechanics Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, July.
  6. Dowding, C.H. and Rozan, A. (1978), "Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking", J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 104(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000580
  7. Fattah, M.Y., Hamoo, M.J. and Dawood, S.H. (2015), "Dynamic response of a lined tunnel with transmitting boundaries", Earthq. Struct., 8(1), 275-304. http://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.275.
  8. FEMA, H. (2003), Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Earthquake Model, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
  9. Hashash, Y.M., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., John, I. and Yao, C. (2001), "Seismic design and analysis of underground structures", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., 16(4), 247-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7.
  10. Lee, T.H., Park, D., Nguyen, D.D. and Park, J.S. (2016), "Damage analysis of cut-and-cover tunnel structures under seismic loading", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 14(2), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9835-x.
  11. Liu, N., Huang, Q.B., Fan, W., Ma, Y.J. and Peng, J.B. (2018), "Seismic responses of a metro tunnel in a ground fissure site", Geomech. Eng., 15(2), 775-781. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.15.2.775.
  12. Liu, X.R., Li, D.L., Wang, J.B. and Wang, Z. (2015), "Surrounding rock pressure of shallow-buried bilateral bias tunnels under earthquake", Geomech. Eng., 9(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.4.427.
  13. Ministry of Interior and Safety (2017), Korean Seismic Design Criteria: Common Applications.
  14. Okamoto, S. (1973), Introduction to Earthquake Engineering, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, Japan. 29-40.
  15. Ozturk, H.T., Turkeli, E. and Durmus, A. (2016), "Optimum design of RC shallow tunnels in earthquake zones using artificial bee colony and genetic algorithms", Comput. Concrete, 17(4), 435-453. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.4.435.
  16. Park, D., Lee, T.H., Kim, H. and Park, J.S. (2016), "Identification of damage states and damge indices of single box tunnel from inelastic seismic analysis", J. Kor, Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Assoc., 18(2), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2016.18.2.119.
  17. Park, D., Nguyen, D.D., Lee, T.H. and Nguyen, V.Q. (2018), "Seismic fragility evaluation of cut-and-cover tunnel", J. Kor. Geotech. Soc., 34(11), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2018.34.11.71.
  18. Pitilakis, K. and Tsinidis, G. (2014), Performance and Seismic Design of Underground Structures, Springer International Publishing, New York, U.S.A.
  19. Plaxis, B. (2016), Reference manual for PLAXIS 2D, Delft, The Netherlands.
  20. Roy, N. and Sarkar, R. (2017), "A review of seismic damage of mountain tunnels and probable failure mechanisms", Geotech. Geol. Eng., 35(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0091-x.
  21. Sevim, B. (2013), "Assessment of 3D earthquake response of the Arhavi Highway Tunnel considering soil-structure interaction", Comput. Concrete, 11(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2013.11.1.051.
  22. Werner, S.D., Taylor, C.E., Cho, S., Lavoie, J.P., Huyck, C.K., Eitzel, C., Chung, H. and Eguchi, R.T. (2006), "Redars 2 methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems", Report No. MCEER-060SP08, University of Buffalo, The State University of New York, U.S.A.

Cited by

  1. Seismic fragility analysis of a cemented Sand-gravel dam considering two failure modes vol.26, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.26.6.483