디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제18권3호
  • /
  • Pages.123-131
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과업갈등의 부정적 효과와 신뢰가 팀 지향성의 중요성에 관한 연구

A Study on the Negative Effects of Task Conflict and the Importance of Trust in Peers and Team Orientation

  • 김영형 (금오공과대학교 IT융합학과)
  • Kim, Young-Hyoung (Department of IT Convergence, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2019.12.23
  • 심사 : 2020.03.20
  • 발행 : 2020.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 과업갈등이 관계갈등으로 전이되고 또한 관계갈등이 팀 만족 감소로 전이되는 과정에서 팀 구성원간 신뢰수준이 높을수록, 팀 지향성이 높을수록 과업갈등과 관계갈등의 관계가 약화되는지, 그리고 관계갈등과 팀 만족 감소의 관계가 약화되는지 확인하는 것이었다. 경북지역 내 기업 구성원 350명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고, 274부가 실증분석에 활용되었다. 가설검증을 위해 확인적 요인분석, 위계적 회귀분석을 실시하였고, 실증분석 결과 과업갈등은 관계갈등을 증가시키는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 과업갈등으로 야기된 관계갈등은 팀 구성원의 만족도 또한 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 과업갈등의 부정적 효과는 팀원 간의 신뢰수준과 팀 지향성 수준에 따라 조절될 수 있음을 확인하였다. 그리고 팀 지향성은 관계갈등과 팀 만족간의 부(-)적 영향관계를 조절하는 것으로 나타났다. 기업은 과업갈등과 관계갈등의 영향관계에서 신뢰의 중요성과 관계갈등과 팀 만족도 간의 부정적 관계에서 팀 지향성의 중요성을 기억해야 할 것이며, 연구과정에서 나타난 횡단적 연구의 한계 등을 보완할 연구방법이 추후에는 보완되어야 할 것이다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of task conflict on relationship conflict and the effect of relationship conflict on team satisfaction and to examine the moderating role of trust in peers in the relationship between task conflict and relationship conflict and the moderating role of team orientation in the relationship between relationship conflict and team satisfaction. The major findings were as follows: First, it was found that task conflict had a positive effect on relationship conflict and relationship conflict had a negative effect on team satisfaction. Second, it was found that trust in peers moderated the relationship between task conflict and relationship conflict. Third, it was also found that team orientation moderated the relationship between relationship conflict and team satisfaction. Based on the findings, practical implications and suggestions for future studies were provided.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. C. K. De Dreu, F. Harinck & A. E. Van Vianen (1999), Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology(Vol. 14), Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley, 369-414.
  2. A. C. Amason & H. J. Sapienza (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90045-3
  3. K. A. Jehn (1995), A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282. DOI: 10.2307/2393638
  4. H. J. Bang. (2014). The relationship between task and team performance. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 27(11), 1863-1882.
  5. M. A. Korsgaard, S. S. Jeong, D. M. Mahony & A. H. Pitariu (2008). A multilevel view of intragroup conflict. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1222-1252. DOI: 10.1177/0149206308325124
  6. A. C. Amason (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on atrategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.5465/256633
  7. M. K. Duffy, J. D. Shaw & E. M. Stark (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: when and how does self-esteem make a difference?. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 772-782. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556367
  8. R. A. Cosier & G. L. Rose (1977). Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(2), 378-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(77)90071-x
  9. T. R. Kurtzberg & J.S. Mueller (2005). The influence of daily conflict on perceptions of creativity: a longitudinal study. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(4), 335-353.
  10. L. A. DeChurch & M. A. Marks (2001). Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022847
  11. J. L. Farh, C. Lee & C. I. C. Farh (2010). ask conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020015
  12. K. A. Jehn, C. Chadwick & S. M. Thatcher (1997). To agree or not to agree: the effects of value congruence, undividual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8(4), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022799
  13. S. H. Han (2008), Effects of moderating variable on the transference of task conflict and relationship conflict (Master's Thesis). Seoul: Sungkyunkwan University.
  14. S. M. Thatcher & K. A. Jehn (1998). A model of group diversity profiles and categorization processes in bicultural organizational teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 1, 1-20.
  15. H. S. Kim, & J. H. Lee (2012). A study on the moderating role of participative safety climate in effect relations between task conflict and relationship conflict in the team. Korean Corporation Management Review, 19(6), 115-132.
  16. K. A. Jehn (1994), Enhancing effectiveness: an investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022744
  17. K. A. Jehn, (1997), A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-557. DOI: 10.2307/2393737
  18. T. L. Simons & R. S. Peterson (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
  19. O. Janssen, E. Van De Vliert & C. Veenstra (1999), How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500201
  20. K. A. Jehn & E. A. Mannix (2001), The dynamic Nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251. DOI: 10.2307/3069453
  21. P. Bateson. (1988). The biological evolution of cooperation and trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.). Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, New York, NY: Basil Blackwell, 14-30.
  22. K. T. Dirks & D. L. Ferrin (2002). Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
  23. D. E. Zand (1972). Trust and managerial Problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239. DOI: 10.2307/2393957
  24. A. C. Costa, R. A. Roe & T. Taillieu (2001), Trust within teams: the relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 225-244. DOI: 10.1080/13594320143000654
  25. R. S. Peterson & K. J. Behfar (2003). The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: a longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6
  26. J. E. Driskell & E. Salas (1992), Collective behavior and team performance, human factors. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34(3), 277-288. DOI: 10.1177/001872089203400303
  27. L. T. Eby & G. H. Dobbins (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)18:3<275::AID-JOB796>3.0.CO;2-C
  28. G. A. Neuman & J. Wight (1999). Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 376-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376
  29. J. Cook & T. Wall (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfillment, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376
  30. L. A. Isabella & S. A. Waddock (1994), Top management team certainty: environmental assessments, teamwork, and performance implications. Journal of Management, 20(4), 835-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90032-9
  31. B. Wheaton, B. Muthen, D. F. Alwin & G. F. Summers (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136. DOI: 10.2307/270754
  32. H. R Aguinis, Gottfredson, K. & Wright T. A. (2011). Best‐practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.719
  33. M. Y, Kim. (2018). The effects of nurses' working environment and reliability with superiors on turnover intention, Journal of the Korean Convergence Society, 9(10), 457-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.10.457
  34. J. M. Kang & J.O. K(2017). A convergence study about influences of trust in supervisor, customer badness behavior, turnover intention behavior on job embeddedness in clinical nurses, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(7), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.7.113