DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Possibility of Using Children's Architectural Work as Projective Test - Through Comparative Analysis with MBTI Psychological Preference Types -

어린이 기초건축교육의 투사검사 활용 가능성에 관한 연구 - MBTI 심리선호경향과 비교분석을 통하여 -

  • Received : 2020.01.07
  • Accepted : 2020.03.11
  • Published : 2020.03.30

Abstract

This study is preliminary and qualitative research to find out the possibility of using children's architectural work as projective test tools. The features of 21 works from the activity of built-environment education for children was analyzed and compared with MBTI psychological preference types. The key results are as follows: 1) Observation and communication was required to understand and analyze children's architectural works. 2) The results of children's work appeared in various ways, and were classified as indicators according to composition, shape, expression, program, circulation. These indicators also showed the independence of personal expression types regardless of age or gender. 3) The comparison between architectural expressions and MBTI preference types revealed a significant relationship between the indicators. The relationship only appeared in certain indicator pairs. Therefore, it can be said that the built-environment education could be used as a projection test tool to understand the psychological preferences of children. In conclusion, the meanings and limitations of this study and the possibility of future researches were discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Cathy A. Malchiodi (2001). Understanding Children's Drawings (Kim D. et al., Trans.), Hakjisa.
  2. Choi J. (2010). Understanding Psychological Test, sigmapress.
  3. Choi J., & Lee K. (2014). Research Trend of Projective Drawing Tests in Korea, Korean Journal of Art Therapy, 21(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.35594/kata.2014.21.1.001
  4. Kim, Y., & Jin, H. (2011). The Action Plan on the Built Environment Education for Expanding the Base of Architecture Culture, Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  5. Kim Y., Moon S., & Hong S. (2005). Psychological Testing: Theory & Practice, Hakjisa.
  6. Kim, N., & Lee, S. (2005). A Study on Residential Evaluation & Remodeling Preference Characteristics with the Personality Type(I), Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 14(3), 208-215.
  7. Lee, D., & Ko, E. (2011). A Study on the Relationship Between Personality and Interior Style Preference, Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 27(2), 99-106.
  8. Lee, H., & Park, S. (2013). Study on Users' Housing and Interior Design Needs Affected by Personality Types, Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design, 22(6), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2013.22.6.088
  9. Lee S., & You K. (2017). Research Trend of Projective Drawing Tests in Korea by Using Domestic Journals, Korean Journal of Art Therapy, 24(6), 1509-1529. https://doi.org/10.35594/kata.2017.24.6.007
  10. https://academic.naver.com/(2020.01.05.)