DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Financing COVID-19 Deficits in Fiscally Dominant Economies: Is The Monetarist Arithmetic Unpleasant?

  • Received : 2020.11.09
  • Accepted : 2020.12.03
  • Published : 2020.12.30

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic of 2019-20 confronted fiscally dominant regimes around the world with the question of whether the large deficits caused by the health crisis should be monetized or financed by issuing debt. The unpleasant monetarist arithmetic of Sargent and Wallace (1981) states that in a fiscally dominant regime tighter money now can cause higher inflation in the future. In spite of the qualifier 'unpleasant,' this result is positive in nature, and, therefore, void of normative content. I analyze conditions under which it is optimal in a welfare sense for the central bank to delay inflation by issuing debt to finance part of the fiscal deficit. The analysis is conducted in the context of a model in which the aforementioned monetarist arithmetic holds, in the sense that if the government finds it optimal to delay inflation, it does so knowing that it would result in higher inflation in the future. The central result of the paper is that delaying inflation is optimal when the fiscal deficit is expected to decline over time.

Keywords

References

  1. Barro, R. J. 1979. "On the Determination of the Public Debt," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 940-971. https://doi.org/10.1086/260807
  2. Inagaki, K. 2009. "Estimating the Interest Rate Semi-Elasticity of the Demand for Money in Low Interest Rate Environments," Economic Modelling, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2008.06.004
  3. Kiguel, M. A. and P. A. Neumeyer. 1995. "Seigniorage and Inflation: The Case of Argentina," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 672-682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077742
  4. Leeper, E. M. 1991. "Equilibria under 'Active' and 'Passive' Monetary and Fiscal Policies," Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(91)90007-B
  5. Lucas, R. E. and N. L. Stokey. 1983. "Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy in an Economy without Capital," Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(83)90049-1
  6. Manuelli, R. E. and J. I. Vizcaino. 2017. "Monetary Policy with Declining Deficits: Theory and an Application to Recent Argentine Monetary Policy," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 351-375.
  7. Sargent, T. J. and N. Wallace. 1981. "Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic," Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1-17.
  8. Schmitt-Grohe, S. and M. Uribe. 2004. "Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy Under Imperfect Competition," Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 183-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2003.11.002
  9. Sims, C. A. 1994. "A Simple Model for Study of the Determination of the Price Level and the Interaction of Monetary and Fiscal Policy," Economic Theory, vol. 4, no.3, pp. 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215378
  10. Woodford, M. 1996. "Control of the Public Debt: a Requirement for Price Stability?" NBER Working Paper, no. 5684.