Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of an evidence-based clinical imaging diagnostic guideline for implant planning: Joint recommendations of the Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency

  • Kim, Min-Ji (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sam-Sun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Miyoung (Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency) ;
  • Ha, Eun Ju (Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Chena (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Jo-Eun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2019.09.19
  • Accepted : 2019.12.03
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop an evidence-based clinical imaging diagnostic guideline for implant planning, taking into account efficacy, benefits, and risks. Materials and Methods: The guideline development process employed the adaptation methodology used for Korean clinical imaging guidelines(K-CIG). Core databases(Ovid-Medline, Ovid-Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guideline International Network) and domestic databases (KoreaMed, KMbase, and KoMGI) were searched for guidelines. The retrieved articles were analyzed by 2 reviewers, and articles were selected using well-established inclusion criteria. Results: The search identified 294 articles, of which 3 were selected as relevant guidelines. Based on those 3 guidelines, 3 recommendations for implant planning were derived. Conclusion: We recommend radiography or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning for individual patients judged to require a cross-sectional image after reading of a panoramic X-ray image and a conventional intraoral radiological image. Various steps should be taken to raise awareness of these recommendations among clinicians and the public, and K-CIG should be regularly reviewed and revised.

Keywords

References

  1. Harris D, Horner K, Grondahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, et al. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1243-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02441.x
  2. Fienitz T, Schwarz F, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Becker J, Rothamel D. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 882-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x
  3. Bornstein MM, Horner K, Jacobs R. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12161
  4. Choi SJ, Jeong WK, Jo AJ, Choi JA, Kim MJ, Lee M, et al. Methodology for developing evidence-based clinical imaging guidelines: joint recommendations by Korean Society of Radiology and National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Korean J Radiol 2017; 18: 208-16. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.208
  5. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ 2010; 182: E839-42. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090449
  6. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 Suppl: 55-77. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.4
  7. Bornstein MM, Al Nawas B, Kuchler U, Tahmaseb A. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 Suppl: 78-82. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g1
  8. SEDENTEXCT Guideline Development Panel. Radiation protection No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. Luxembourg: European Comminssion Directorate-General for Energy; 2012.
  9. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5
  10. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Avsever H, Ozdemir T. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15: 893-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00436.x
  11. Lee C, Lee SS, Kim JE, Symkhampha K, Lee WJ, Huh KH, et al. A dose monitoring system for dental radiography. Imaging Sci Dent 2016; 46: 103-8. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2016.46.2.103
  12. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Sanderink G, De Smet E, Nowak B, Van Dam J, et al. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 159-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600683
  13. Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Periodontol 2000 2014; 66: 203-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12051

Cited by

  1. Two decades of research on CBCT imaging in DMFR - an appraisal of scientific evidence vol.50, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200367