대한지구과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education)

  • 제13권3호
  • /
  • Pages.317-329
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2005-5668(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0386(eISSN)
대한지구과학교육학회 (The Korean Society of Earth Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COVID-19 상황에서 초등 과학 전담 교사의 수업 운영 실태 및 인식

A Study on Status and Perception of Class Operation by Elementary School Science Specialized Teachers in COVID-19 Situation

  • 투고 : 2020.11.30
  • 심사 : 2020.12.18
  • 발행 : 2020.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 COVID-19 상황에서 초등 과학 전담 교사들은 과학 수업을 어떻게 운영하고 있으며 수업에 대해 어떤 인식을 갖고 있는지 조사하는 것이다. 연구 참여자는 2020년 과학 교과 전담교사를 맡고 있는 21명이다. 21명 전체를 대상으로 COVID-19 상황에서의 과학 수업과 앞으로의 수업방향에 대한 개방형 설문을 실시하였고, 21명 중 8명을 대상으로 과학 수업을 어떻게 하고 왜 그렇게 했는지등에 대한 면담을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 초등 과학 교사들의 COVID-19 이전과 이후의 과학 수업은 달랐다. COVID-19 상황에서 교사들은 온라인 수업과 오프라인 수업의 특성을 파악하고 특성에 따른 방식으로 운영하였다. 둘째, 이러한 과학 수업 운영 방식의 바탕에는 교사의 수업에 대한 공통된 인식이 있었으며, 그 인식은 과학 수업은 탐구 활동으로 운영해야 한다는 것, 방침이 허락하는 한, 내 입맛에 맞는 수업을 하고 싶다는 것, 온라인 수업은 학생들의 동기 저하 및 학력 격차 확대를 야기하며 이를 극복해야 한다는 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to investigate how elementary science specialized teachers operate and how they have a perception of the science class in the COVID-19 situation. The number of participants in the study is 21 who are dedicated to science subjects in 2020. 21 teachers were given an open survey of science classes and future directions in the COVID-19 situation, and 8 out of 21 teachers were interviewed in-depth on how and why they did so. As a result of the study, first, the science classes before and after COVID-19 of primary science teachers were different. Under the COVID-19 situation, teachers identified the characteristics of online and offline classes and operated them in a way that was specific to their characteristics. Second, there was a common perception of teachers' classes on the basis of this science class operation style, which is that science classes should be operated as activities, that I would like to have classes that suit my taste as long as the policy allows, and that online classes cause students to lose motivation and widen their educational gap.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육부(2020a). 교육부 보도자료(2020. 3. 24.); 학교 안팎 고강도 사회적 거리두기 추진(코로나19).
  2. 교육부(2020b). 교육부 보도자료(2020. 3. 31.); 처음으로 초중고특 신학기 온라인 개학 실시(코로나19).
  3. 교육부(2020c). 유.초.중등 및 특수학교 코로나19 감염 예방 관리 안내. 세종: 교육부.
  4. Cavanaugh, C., Gillian, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Naperville, IL: Learning Point.
  5. Downing, K. F. (2016). Developing online earth science courses. In D. K. Kennepohl (Ed.), Teaching science online: Practical guidance for effective instruction and lab work (pp. 46-66). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  6. Frid, S., & Soden, R. (2001). Supporting primary students' on-line learning in a virtual enrichment program. Research in Education, 66(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.66.2
  7. Grober, S., Eckert, B., & Jodl, H. J. (2013). A new medium for physics teaching: results of a worldwide study of remotely controlled laboratories. European Journal of Physics, 35(1), 018001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/1/018001
  8. Hughes, J. E., McLeod, S., Brown, R., J'v1aeda, Y., & Choi, J. (2005). Staff development and student perceptions of the learning environment in virtual and traditional secondary schools. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Learning Point Associates.
  9. Jeschofnig, L., & Jeschofnig, P. (2011). Teaching lab science courses online. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Kennepohl, D. K. (2013). Teaching science at a distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 670-683). England: Routledge.
  11. Kennepohl, D. K. (2016). Teaching science online: Practical guidance for effective instruction and lab work. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
  12. Lyall, R., & Patti, A. F. (2010). Taking the chemistry experience home-home experiments or "kitchen chemis-try". In D. Kennepohl, & L. Shaw (Eds.), Accessible elements: Teaching science online and at a distance (pp. 83-108). Canada: AU Press.
  13. Makela, T., Mehtala, S., Clements, K., & Seppa, J. (2020). Schools went online over one weekend: Opportunities and challenges for online education related to the COVID-19 crisis. Proceedings of EdMedia+Innovate Learning 2020, 77-85. Waynesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  14. Mawn, M. V., Carrico, P., Charuk, K., Stote, K. S., & Lawrence, B. (2011). Hands-on and online: Scientific explorations through distance learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 26(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.567464
  15. Mills, S. C. (2003). Implementing online secondary education: An evaluation of a virtual high school. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003, 444-451, Norfolk, VA: AACE.
  16. Mosse, J., & Wright, W. (2010). Acquisition of laboratory skills by on-campus and distance education students. In D. Kennepohl, & L. Shaw (Eds.), Accessible elements: Teaching science online and at a distance (pp. 83-108). Edmonton, AB: AU Press.
  17. Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Prospective teachers' online learning Mathematics activities in the age of COVID-19: A cluster analysis approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(9), em1872. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8345
  18. Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovic, V. M., & Jovanovic, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
  19. Reeves, J., & Kimbrough, D. (2004). Solving the laboratory dilemma in distance learning general chemistry. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(3), 47-51.
  20. Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782468
  21. Roblyer, M. D., & Marshall, J. C. (2003). Predicting the success of virtual high school students: Preliminary results from an educational success prediction instrument. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782384
  22. Shaw, L., & Carmichael, R. (2010). Needs, costs, and accessibility of DE science lab programs. In D. Kennepohl, & L. Shaw (Eds.), Accessible elements: Teaching science online and at a distance (pp. 191-211). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.
  23. Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893
  24. Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4
  25. Tunison, S., & Noonan, B. (2001). On-line learning: Secondary students' first experience. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(4), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602179