Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spectral Shape in Accordance with the Magnitude and Distance of Earthquakes and Its Effect on Multi-DOF Structures

지진의 규모와 거리에 따른 스펙트럼 형상과 다자유도 구조물에 대한 영향

  • Kim, Jin Woo (Department of Architecture Engineering, Cheongju University) ;
  • Kim, Dong Kwan (Department of Architecture Engineering, Cheongju University) ;
  • Kim, Ho Soo (Department of Architecture Engineering, Cheongju University)
  • 김진우 (청주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김동관 (청주대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김호수 (청주대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.04
  • Accepted : 2019.12.05
  • Published : 2020.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study earthquake records were collected for rock conditions that do not reflect seismic amplification by soil from global earthquake databases such as PEER, USGS, and ESMD. The collected earthquake records were classified and analyzed based on the magnitude and distance of earthquakes. Based on the analyzed earthquakes, the design response spectrum shape, effective ground acceleration, and amplification ratios for each period band are presented. In addition, based on the analyzed data, the story shear force for 5F, 10F, 15F, and 20F were derived through an analysis of the elastic time history for multi-DOF structures. The results from analyzing the rock earthquake record show that the seismic load tends to be amplified greatly in the short period region, which is similar to results observed from the Gyeongju and Pohang earthquakes. In addition, the results of the multi-DOF structure analysis show that existing seismic design criteria can be underestimated and designed in the high-order mode of short- and medium-long cycle structures.

Keywords

References

  1. KDS 41 17 00 Building Seismic Design: Standard. Seoul: Architectural Institute of Korea. c2019. 123 p.
  2. Kim DW. An Effect of very shallow soft soil and basement structure on elastic design response spectrum; Seoul University. c2008.
  3. Lee CH, Park JH, Kim TJ, Kim SY, Kim DK. Damage Potential Analysis and Earthquake Engineering-related Implications of Sep. 12, 2016 M5.8 Gyeongju Earthquake. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2016;20(7):527-536. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2016.20.7.527
  4. Lee CH, Kim SY, Park JH, Kim DK, Kim TJ, Park KH. Comparative Analysis of Structural Damage Potentials Observed in the 9.12 Gyeongju and 11.15 Pohang Earthquakes. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2018;22(3):175-184. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2018.22.3.175
  5. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. 1998-1:2004. European Committee for Standardization. c2004. 299 p.
  6. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center [Internet]. Available from: https://peer.berkeley.edu
  7. U.S. Geological Survey [Internet]. Available from: https://www.usgs.gov/.
  8. European Strong-Motion Database [Internet]. Available from: https://www.isesd.hi.is.
  9. Yoon JK, Kim DS, Bang ES. Development of Site Classification System and Modification of Design Response Spectra considering Geotechnical Site Characteristics in Korea (I). Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2006;10(2):39-50. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2006.10.2.039
  10. KDS 17 10 00 Seismic Design: General. 1st ed. Seoul: Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. c2018. 21 p.
  11. International Building Code. International Code Council, Country Club Hills Illinois. c2003.
  12. Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall. c2000.
  13. Applied Technology Council. Tentative provisions for the development, of seismic regulations for buildings. ATC-3-06 (NBS SP-510). Washington, DC: U.S Government Printing Office; c1978.