Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The acquisition of boundary tones in spontaneous speech by Korean learners of English

  • Received : 2020.11.14
  • Accepted : 2020.12.14
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The current study was designed to investigate which type of phrase boundary tones high-intermediate Korean learners of English used in their spontaneous speech. These boundary tones were compared to those used in native speakers' spontaneous speech to examine whether the learners successfully acquired the use of boundary tones. To achieve this purpose, 10 Korean learners of English and four native speakers of English participated in the current study. The participants were asked to summarize the stories of short videos, and the tonal and the phrasing patterns of the obtained spontaneous speech were analyzed using Tone and Break Indices (ToBI) transcription conventions. The results indicated that both the native speakers and the Korean learners frequently marked their intonational phrase boundaries with high boundary tones. However, regarding the prosodic phrase positions within a sentence, Korean learners frequently used steep rising tones (i.e., H-H%) while native speakers used gradual rising tones (i.e., L-H%) for sentence-final intonational phrases. Overall, the findings suggested that high-intermediate Korean learners understood the forward-looking function of the high boundary tones and that they were able to make use of these tones to mark intonational phrases in their spontaneous speech.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K., (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x
  2. Beckman, M. E., & Elam, G. A. (1997). Guidelines for ToBI labelling (Version 3.0). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Research Foundation.
  3. Beckman, M. E, & Hirschberg, J. (1994). The ToBI annotation conventions. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
  4. Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The Original ToBI System and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In S. A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 99-116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  5. Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 5-70.
  6. Bhat, S., & Yoon, S. Y. (2015). Automatic assessment of syntactic complexity for spontaneous speech scoring. Speech Communication, 67, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2014.09.005
  7. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.66) [Computer Program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
  8. Candea, M., Vasilescu, I., & Adda-Decker, M. (2005, September). Inter- and intra-language acoustic analysis of autonomous fillers. Proceedings of Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop (pp. 47-52).
  9. Choe, W. K. (2016). Acquisition of prosodic phrasing and edge tones by Korean learners of English. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8(4), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.4.031
  10. Clopper, C. G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006
  11. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2001). Intonation and discourse: Current views from within. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 13-34). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  12. DeRuiter, L. E. (2015). Information status marking in spontaneous vs. read speech in story-telling tasks- Evidence from intonation analysis using GToBI. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.008
  13. Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Face, T. L. (2003). Intonation in Spanish declaratives: differences between lab speech and spontaneous speech. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.46
  15. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
  16. Fletcher, J., Stirling, L., Mushin, I., & Wales, R. (2002). Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Language and Speech, 45(3), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450030201
  17. Hewings, M. (1995). Tone choice in the English intonation of non-native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 251-303.
  18. Holden, K. T., & Hogan, J. T. (1993). The emotive impact of foreign intonation: An experiment in switching English and Russian intonation. Language and Speech, 36(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600104
  19. Huang, B. H., & Jun, S. A. (2011). The effect of age on the acquisition of second language prosody. Language and Speech, 54(3), 387-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911402599
  20. Jun, S. A. (1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15(2), 189-226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675798003571
  21. Jun, S. A. (2005). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In S. A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 430-458). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, UK.
  22. Kim, J. E. (2019). Acoustic characteristics of read and spontaneous speech in Seoul Korean with between-age variability. Korean Linguistics, 85, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.20405/kl.2019.11.85.61
  23. Krivokapic, J. (2007). Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.04.001
  24. Ladd, R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Lee, J. K. (2005). Korean speaker's edge tone patterns of English conjunctive utterances. Speech Sciences, 12, 141-152.
  26. Lee, J. K. (2008). An intonational assessment of English communicative competence of Korean college students with the 7th curriculum. Modern English Education, 9(1), 256-282.
  27. Lieberman, P., Katz, W., Jongman, A., Zimmerman, R., & Miller, M. (1985). Measures of the sentence intonation of read and spontaneous speech in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(2), 649-657. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391883
  28. Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013735
  29. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49(1), 285-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8
  30. Ohala, J. J. (1983). Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica, 40(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261678
  31. Park, S. B., Skrypiczajko, G., & Kim, K. H. (2000). A study on the realization of intonational tunes depending on the difference of meaning in English: In comparison of English native speakers with Korean speakers. Speech Sciences, 7(2), 97-112.
  32. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  33. Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  34. Shokier, V. (2008). Evidence for the stable use of uptalk in South Ontario English. Working Papers in UPenn Linguistics, 14(2), 16-21.
  35. Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1002
  36. Tomlinson Jr, J. M., & Tree, J. E. F. (2011). Listeners' comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 119(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.005
  37. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013
  38. Veilleux, N., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Brugos, A. (2006). The ToBI tutorial. Cambridge, MA: MIT OpenCourseWare. Online: http://anita.simmons.edu/-tobi/index.htm
  39. Veilleux, N., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Brugos, A. (2006). 6.911 Transcribing prosodic structure of spoken utterances with ToBI. from MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-911-transcribing-prosodic-structure-of-spoken-utterances-with-tobi-january-iap-2006/