참고문헌
- Kim, K. H., Lim, E. Y., & Shin, J. A. (2013). Analysis and prediction of students's affective domain based on the results of National Assessment of Educational Achievement, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 26(5), 981-1014.
- Kang, M. J. (2018). Longitudinal Analysis of High School Students' Affective Attitude, Recognition of Teacher's Teaching Ability, Learning Strategy, and Achievement in Mathematics, Doctoral thesis, Iwaki Womans University.
- Ko, Y. J. (2018). A study on analysis of actual state of mathmatics renouncers and treatment at the renouncer's level. Master's thesis, Ulsan University Graduate School of Education.
- Kim, S. S., & Ko, M. S. (2007). The Factor of Effect in Growth of Academic Achievement in Adolescent : The Use of Latent Growth Model, Studies on Korean Youth, 18(3), 5-29.
- Kim, S. I. (2006). Learner-centered interdisciplinary reform: contribution to educational psychology. Proceedings of the Fall Conference of the Korean Educational Association.
- Kim, S. H., Kang, D. H., Moon, S. M., Yoon, W. S. & Park, S. H. (2016). Research on the achievement score for the academic achievement test for the 7th year Seoul National University of Education, Seoul Institute for Education Policy, Institute of Education and Research Information.
- Kim, Y. B., & Kang, H. S. (2017). Student Achievement Growth among Middle School Students. Journal of Korean Education, 44(1), 33-61.
- Kim, Y. S. (2020). A longitudinal study on the effect of learner's internal and external factors on mathematics academic achievement: For middle and high school students. Doctoral thesis, Sungkyunkwan University.
- Kim, H. M., Kim, Y. S., Han, S. Y. (2018). A Longitudinal Analysis on the Relationships Among Mathematics Academic Achievement, Affective Factors, and Shadow Education Participation, School Mathematics, 20(2), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.06.20.2.287
- No, G. S. (2014). Well-informed Thesis Statistical analysis. Han Bit Academy.
- Park, S. H. & Yoon, W. S. (2018). Seoul Education Longitudibal Study 8th User Manual. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Education Research Information Service Education Policy Research Institute.
- Shin, J. C., Jung J. S., & Shin T. S. (2008). Causal Relations Between College Student Academic Achievement and Its Factors, The Journal Educational Administraion, 26(1), 287-313.
- Shin, J. H., & Shin, T. S. (2006). The Analysis of Relations between Academic Achievement, Academic Self-efficacy, Perceived Teacher Expectancy, and Home Environment, The Journal of Child Education, 15(1), 5-23.
- Yang, P. (2017). Analysis of the Effects of Educational Media Usage and Learning Process on Middle School Students' Academic Achievement and Learning Effectiveness: Focused on the seniors of middle school in Seoul. Doctoral thesis, Sungshin University.
- Yoo, H. J. (2016). A Study of the Influence That Learner's Prior Proficiency in Spanish and Participation in Class Have on Their Satisfaction in Clsss and Academic Achievement: Focusing on Spanish Major in Universities. Master's thesis, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.
- Lee, J. H., & Park, S. M. (2011). Current Conditions and Students' Perception on Mathematics Exhibition, School Mathematics, 13(2), 229-243.
- Lim, H. J. (2016). Structural relationships among variables affecting the math in-class attitude of middle school students: Focusing on the student-centered teaching effect at regular and innovation schools. Secondary Education Research, 64(4), 1075-1104. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2016.64.4.1075
- Chung, Y. K., Lee, S. Y., Song, J. Y., & Woo, Y. K. (2017). Differential relations of students' perceived instructions to their motivation, classroom attitude, and academic achievement: The moderating role of self-efficacy, Education Method Research, 29(1), 211-235.
- Brookover, W. B., Schweitzer, J. H., Schneider, J. M., Beady, C. H., Flood, P. K., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American educational research journal, 15(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312015002301
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Edition, 154, 136-162.
- Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
- Corcoran, M. (2000). Mobility, persistence, and the intergenerational determinants of children's success, Focus, 21(2), 16-20.
- Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factory analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
- DeRoon-Cassini, T. A., Mancini, A. D., Rusch, M. D., & Bonanno, G. A. (2010). Psychopathology and Resilience Following Traumatic Injury: A Latent Growth Mixture Model Analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1(55), 1-11.
- Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the association for Information Systems, 1(1), 8.
- Hackman, M. Z., & Walker, K. B. (2009). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learnimng and satisfaction, Communication Education, 39(3), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378802
- Jung, T., & Mickrama, K. A. S. (2007). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. NY: The Guilford Press.
- Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- Muthen, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. 346-368. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Muthen, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Growth mixture modeling: Analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G.(eds.), Longitudinal Data Analysis, pp.143-165. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
- Muthen, B. O., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00463.x
- Wickrama, K. K., Lee, T. K., O'Neal, C. W., & Lorenz, F. O. (2016). Higher-order growth curves and mixture modeling with Mplus: A practical guide. Routledge.
- Wright, D. B. (2017). Some Limits Using Random Slope Models to Measure Academic Growth. In Frontiers in Education. Frontiers, 2(58).
- Ye, F., & Daniel, L. (2017). The Impact of Inappropriate Modeling of Cross-Classified Data Structures on Random-Slope Models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(2), 25.