DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Single-insertion technique for anesthetizing the inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve, and long buccal nerve for extraction of mandibular first and second molars: a prospective study

  • Joseph, Benny (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Dental College) ;
  • Kumar, Nithin (Department of Oral Surgery, Dental Faculty, Tishk International University) ;
  • Vyloppilli, Suresh (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church Hospital and Medical College) ;
  • Sayd, Shermil (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kannur Dental College) ;
  • Manojkumar, KP (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Dental College) ;
  • Vijaykumar, Depesh (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Dental College)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.06
  • 심사 : 2019.12.17
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31

초록

Objectives: Appropriate and accurate local anesthetic (LA) techniques are indispensable in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery to obtain a satisfactory outcome for both the operating surgeon and the patient. When used alone, the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) technique requires supplemental injections like long buccal nerve block for extraction of mandibular molars leading to multiple traumatic experiences for the patient. The aim of this study was to anesthetize the inferior alveolar, lingual, and long buccal nerves with single-needle penetration requiring a minimal skillset such as administering a conventional IANB through introduction of the Benny Joseph technique for extraction of mandibular molars. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kunhitharuvai Memorial Charitable Trust (KMCT) Dental College, Calicut, India. The duration of the study was 6 months, from June to November 2017, with a maximum sample size of 616 cases. The LA solution was 2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline. The patients were selected from a population in the range of 20 to 40 years of age who reported to the outpatient department for routine dental extraction of normally positioned mandibular right or left first or second molars. Results: Of the 616 patients, 42 patients (6.8%) required re-anesthetization, a success rate of 93.2%. There were no complications such as hematoma formation, trismus, positive aspiration, and nerve injuries. None of the cases required re-anesthetization in the perioperative period. Conclusion: The Benny Joseph technique can be employed and is effective compared with conventional IANB techniques by reducing trauma to the patient and also requires less technique sensitivity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kohler BR, Castellon L, Laissle G. Gow-Gates technique: a pilot study for extraction procedures with clinical evaluation and review. Anesth Prog 2008;55:2-8. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2008)55[2:GTAPSF]2.0.CO;2
  2. Madan GA, Madan SG, Madan AD. Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block: exploring the alternatives. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:843-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0298
  3. Dover WR. The mandibular block injection--why it sometimes fails. Oral Health 1971;61:12-4.
  4. Young ER, D'Aguiam G. Successful mandibular anesthesia following numerous unsuccessful attempts: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 1993;59:845, 848-50.
  5. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013.
  6. Johnson TM, Badovinac R, Shaefer J. Teaching alternatives to the standard inferior alveolar nerve block in dental education: outcomes in clinical practice. J Dent Educ 2007;71:1145-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.9.tb04378.x
  7. Suazo Galdames IC, Cantin Lopez MG, Zavando Matamala DA. Inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia via the retromolar triangle, an alternative for patients with blood dyscrasias. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E43-7.
  8. Pipa-Vallejo A, Garcia-Pola-Vallejo MJ. Local anesthetics in dentistry. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2004;9:440-3; 438-40.
  9. Boronat Lopez A, Penarrocha Diago M. Failure of locoregional anesthesia in dental practice. Review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:E510-3.
  10. Kaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:205-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0470
  11. Khalil H. A basic review on the inferior alveolar nerve block techniques. Anesth Essays Res 2014;8:3-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.128891
  12. Levy TP. An assessment of the Gow-Gates mandibular block for third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 1981;103:37-41. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0467
  13. Malamed SF. The Gow-Gates mandibular block. Evaluation after 4,275 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;51:463-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(81)90001-3
  14. Agren E, Danielsson K. Conduction block analgesia in the mandible. A comparative investigation of the techniques of Fischer and Gow-Gates. Swed Dent J 1981;5:81-9.
  15. Kafalias MC, Gow-Gates GA, Saliba GJ. The Gow-Gates technique for mandibular block anesthesia. A discussion and a mathematical analysis. Anesth Prog 1987;34:142-9.
  16. Thangavelu K, Kannan R, Kumar NS. Inferior alveolar nerve block: alternative technique. Anesth Essays Res 2012;6:53-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.103375
  17. Quinn JH. Inferior alveolar nerve block using the internal oblique ridge. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1147-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0392