DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cone-beam computed tomographic imaging of silent sinus syndrome: A case series and a literature review

  • Manila, Nisha G. (Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Arashlow, Mehrnaz Tahmasbi (Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Ehlers, Scott (Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Liang, Hui (Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Nair, Madhu K. (Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.12
  • 심사 : 2020.08.05
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31

초록

While silent sinus syndrome (SSS) is familiar to otolaryngologists and ophthalmologists, it is a rare clinical entity in dentistry and is likely to be underdiagnosed due to dentists' lack of awareness of this condition. SSS presents a diagnostic challenge to dentists, as patients typically have no history of trauma or sinusitis. The characteristic feature of SSS is a gradual retreat of the maxillary sinus walls, resulting in enophthalmos and hypoglobus. Multidetector (multislice) computed tomography is the imaging modality of choice for SSS and other paranasal sinus diseases. Cone-beam computed tomography promises to be an alternative low-dose imaging modality. This report describes 3 cases of SSS in adults, who had no identified clinical symptoms except diminutive and opacified maxillary sinuses, as well as the inward bowing of the sinus walls as noted on cone-beam computed tomographic imaging.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Soparkar CN, Patrinely JR, Cuaycong MJ, Dailey RA, Kersten RC, Rubin PA, et al. The silent sinus syndrome: a cause of spontaneous enophthalmos. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 772-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31267-x
  2. Montgomery WW. Mucocele of the maxillary sinus causing enophthalmos. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon 1964; 43: 41-4.
  3. Hourany R, Aygun N, Della Santina CC, Zinreich SJ. Sielnt sinus syndrome: an acquired condition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2390-2.
  4. Ferro A, Basyuni S, Santhanam V. Not so silent sinus syndrome: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 23: 1-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.04.001
  5. Bacher K, Mermuys K, Casselman J, Thierens H. Evaluation of effective patient dose in paranasal sinus imaging: comparison of cone beam CT, digital tomosynthesis and multi-slice CT. In: Dossel O, Schlegel WC, editors. IFMBE Proceedings. Volume 25. Proceedings of the World Congress 2009 for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; 2009 Sep 7-12; Munich, Germany. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 458-60.
  6. Veldhoen S, Schollchen M, Hanken H, Precht C, Henes FO, Schon G, et al. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: a comparative study on phantom and cadaver head scans. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 790-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4387-2
  7. Casselman JW, Gieraerts K, Volders D, Delanote J, Mermuys K, De Foer B, et al. Cone beam CT: non-dental application. JBR-BTR 2013; 96: 333-53.
  8. Facon F, Eloy P, Brasseur P, Collet S, Bertrand B. The silent sinus syndorme. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 263: 567-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0011-4
  9. Mazzone S, Mancino R, Di Mauro R, Batipsta P, Di Girolamo S. Maxillary antrostomy in a boy to prevent silent sinus syndrome evolution. Otolaryngol(Sunnyvale) 2014; 4: 151.
  10. Jafari-Pozve N, Sheikhi M, Ataie-Khorasgani M, Jafari-Pozve S. Aplasia and hypoplasia of the maxillary sinus: a case series. Dent Res J(Isfahan) 2014; 11: 615-7.
  11. Khanduri S, Agrawal S, Chhabra S, Goyal S. Bilateral maxillary sinus hypoplasia. Case Rep Radiol 2014; 2014: 148940. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/148940
  12. Guillen DE, Pinargote PM, Guarderas JC. The silent sinus syndrome: protean manifestations of a rare upper respratory disorder revisited. Clin Mol Allergy 2013; 11: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7961-11-5
  13. Kass ES, Salman S, Rubin PA, Weber AL, Montgomery WW. Chronic maxillary atelectasis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997; 106: 109-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949710600204
  14. Chen H, van Eijnatten M, Aarab G, Forouzanfar T, de Lange J, van der Stelt P, et al. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evelaution of the oropharynx morphology. Eur J Orthod 2018; 40: 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx030
  15. Almashraqi AA, Ahmed EA, Mohamed NS, Barngkgei IH, Elsherbini NA, Halboub ES. Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I - an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017; 46: 20160323 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160323
  16. Xu J, Reh DD, Carey JP, Mahesh M, Siewerdsen JH. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols. Med Phys 2012; 39: 4932-42. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4736805
  17. Cobb AR, Murthy R, Cousin GC, El-Rasheed A, Toma A, Uddin J, et al. Silent sinus syndrome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50: e81-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.001
  18. Pula JH, Mehta M. Silent sinus syndrome. Curr Opin Opthalmol 2014; 25: 480-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000106
  19. Ahmad M, Freymiller E. Cone beam computed tomography: evaluation of maxillofacial pathology. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010; 38: 41-7.
  20. Guldner C, Ningo A, Voigt J, Diogo I, Heinrichs J, Weber R, et al. Potential of dosage reduction in cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT) for radiological diagnostics of the paranasal sinuses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 1307-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2177-2
  21. Fakhran S, Alhilali L, Sreedher G, Dohatcu AC, Lee S, Ferguson B, et al. Comparison of simulated cone beam computed tomography to conventional helical computed tomography for imaging of rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 2002-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24603
  22. Zojaji R, Naghibzadeh M, Mazloum Farsi Baf M, Nekooei S, Bataghva B, Noorbakhsh S. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2015; 77: 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000373927
  23. De Cock J, Zanca F, Canning J, Pauwels R, Hermans R. A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 1891-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3593-7
  24. Dierckx D, Saldarriaga Vargas C, Rogge F, Lichtherte S, Struelens L. Dosimetric analysis of the use of CBCT in diagnostic radiology: sinus and middle ear. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015; 163: 125-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu117
  25. Demeslay J, Vergez S, Serrano E, Chaynes P, Cantet P, Chaput B, et al. Morphological concordance between CBCT and MDCT: a paranasal sinus-imaging anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 2016; 38: 71-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1509-5
  26. Al Abduwani J, ZilinSkiene L, Colley S, Ahmed S. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies. Am J Otolaryngol 2016; 37: 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.08.002
  27. Yamauchi T, Tani A, Yokoyama S, Ogawa H. Assessment of non-invasive chronic fungal rhinosinusitis by cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT findings. Fukushima J Med Sci 2017; 63: 100-5. https://doi.org/10.5387/fms.2016-16