DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Solidification Structure of Superalloy René 80 and Variation of Tensile Properties after Heat-Treatment

초내열합금 René 80의 응고 조직과 열처리 후 인장특성의 변화

  • Woo, Hanbyeol (R&D Center, Seah Changwon Special Steel Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Shin, Jongho (R&D Center, Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Joo, Yunkon (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering Research Center (ERC) for Integrated Mechatronics Materials and Components, Changwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jehyun (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering Research Center (ERC) for Integrated Mechatronics Materials and Components, Changwon National University)
  • 우한별 (세아창원특수강(주) 기술연구소) ;
  • 신종호 (두산중공업(주) 기술연구소) ;
  • 주윤곤 (창원대학교 신소재공학부) ;
  • 이재현 (창원대학교 신소재공학부)
  • Received : 2020.10.04
  • Accepted : 2020.11.14
  • Published : 2020.12.27

Abstract

Microstructural characteristics of directionally solidified René 80 superalloy are investigated with optical microscope and scanning electron microscope; solidification velocity is found to change from 25 to 200 μm/s under the condition of constant thermal gradient (G) and constant alloy composition (Co). Based on differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement, γ phase (1,322 ℃), MC carbide (1,278 ℃), γ/γ' eutectic phase (1,202 ℃), and γ' precipitate (1,136 ℃) are formed sequentially during cooling process. The size of the MC carbide and γ/γ' eutectic phases gradually decrease with increasing solidification velocity, whereas the area fractions of MC carbide and γ/γ' eutectic phase are nearly constant as a function of solidification velocity. It is estimated that the area fractions of MC carbide and γ/γ' eutectic phase are determined not by the solidification velocity but by the alloy composition. Microstructural characteristics of René 80 superalloy after solid solution heat-treatment and primary aging heat-treatment are such that the size and the area fraction of γ' precipitate are nearly constant with solidification velocity and the area fraction of γ/γ' eutectic phase decreases from 1.7 % to 0.955 %, which is also constant regardless of the solidification velocity. However, the size of carbide solely decreases with increasing solidification velocity, which influences the tensile properties at room temperature.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Tiley, G. Viswanathan, J. Hwang, A. Shiveley and R. Banerjee, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 528, 32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.036
  2. M. Afhaie-Khafri and M. Hajjavady, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 487, 388 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.010
  3. R. Sidhu, O. Ojo and M. Chaturvedi, J. Mater. Sci., 43, 3612 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2575-4
  4. Y. Xu, Q. Jin, X. Xiao, X. Cao, G. Jia and Y. Zhu, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 528, 4600 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.072
  5. Y. Xu, C. Yang, X. Xiao, X. Cao, G. Jia and Z. Shen, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 530, 315 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.091
  6. S. Kwon, J. Shin, G. Rim, G. Sung, B. Yoon, E. Jung and J. Lee, Korean J. Met. Mater., 56, 745 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3365/KJMM.2018.56.10.745
  7. C. Wei, H. Bor and L. Chang, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 527, 3741 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.053
  8. J. Safari and S. Nategh, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 176, 240 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.165
  9. F. L. Versnyder and M. E. Shank, Mater. Sci. Eng., 6, 213 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(70)90050-9
  10. J. D. Hunt, Int. Conf. Solidification and Casting of Metals, p. 3, Metals Society, London (1979).
  11. W. Kurz and D. J. Fisher, Acta Metall., 29, 11 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(81)90082-1
  12. R. Trivedi, Metall. Trans. A, 15, 977 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644689
  13. T. F. Bower, H. D. Brody and M. C. Flemings, Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 236, 624 (1966).
  14. J. S. Langer, Rev. Mod. Phys., 52, 1 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.1
  15. C. Yang, Y. Xu, H. Nie, X. Xiao, G. Jia and Z. Shen, Mater. Des., 43, 66 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.039