DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Gap Between Knowing the Importance of and the Actual Implementation of Family-centered Practices of Social Workers at Community Welfare Centers in Gyeonggi-do: Focused on IPA Analysis

경기도 지역사회복지관 사회복지사의 가족중심실천에 관한 중요도와 수행도의 차이연구: IPA분석을 중심으로

  • Lee, Eun A (Dept. of Social Welfare, Sungkyul University)
  • 이은아 (성결대학교 사회복지학부)
  • Received : 2020.11.04
  • Accepted : 2020.12.20
  • Published : 2020.12.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the Gap Between Knowing the importance of and the Actual Implementation of family-centered practices of social workers at local social welfare centers in Gyeonggi-do, and to explore strategies at the institutional level to improve these differences. To this end, a survey was conducted on 232 social workers at 54 community welfare centers in Gyeonggi-do, and the t-test and IPA analysis techniques were used. As a result of the study, first, the importance of family-centered practice of social workers at community welfare centers is highly recognized, but the current performance is low. Second, as a result of verifying the difference in importance-performance regarding family-centered practice, it was found that there were statistically significant differences in all of the 6 sub-factor areas and 18 detailed items of family-centered practice. Third, as a result of IPA analysis of the importance-performance of family-centered practice, at keep up good work(family decision making, comprehensive service), at possible overkill(family focus) was derived, at low priority(family strength, individualization), at concentrate here(cooperation with family) were for each sub-factor. Based on these results, an institutional strategic plan to improve the difference between the importance and performance of family-centered practice was suggested.

본 연구는 경기도 지역사회복지관 사회복지사의 가족중심실천에 관한 중요도와 수행도 간의 차이를 분석하고 이러한 차이를 개선할 수 있는 기관 차원의 전략을 탐색하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었다. 이를 위해 경기도 지역사회복지관 54개소 사회복지사 232명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 대응표본 t-검증과 IPA분석기법을 활용하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 지역사회복지관 사회복지사의 가족중심실천에 관한 중요도는 높게 인식하고 있으나 현재 수행도는 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 가족중심실천에 관한 중요도-수행도 차이 검증 결과, 가족중심실천의 6개 하위요인 영역과 18개 세부 항목 모두 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 가족중심실천의 중요도-수행도 IPA분석한 결과, 하위요인별 유지영역(가족의사결정, 포괄적서비스), 과잉영역(가족초점), 저순위영역(가족강점, 개별화), 집중영역(가족과의 협력)으로 조사되었다. 이러한 결과를 중심으로 가족중심실천에 관한 중요도와 수행도의 차이를 개선할 수 있는 기관차원의 전략적 방안을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea National Statistical Office. http://kostat.go.kr/
  2. M. G. Kim. (2020). A Study on the Improvement of Civil Law due to the Spread of Various Family Types. The Korean Society of Family Law, 34(1), 53-73. DOI : 10.31998/KSFL.2020.34.1.31
  3. Y. M. Bae. (2011). The Paradigm of Family Centered Social Work Practice. Seoul Women's University Social Welfare Research Center, 10(1), 31-82.
  4. S. S. Joe. (2007). A Study on Case Management Practice in Community Welfare Centers: On the Necessity of Applying Family-Centered Practice Model. Yeonsung University Research Papers, 37, 783-790.
  5. Y. J. You. (2007). A Study on the Concept of Family-centered Practice. Catholic University Institute of Social Welfare, 12, 83-103.
  6. M. S. Suk. (2007). A Study on the Recognition of Social Workers to a Family-Centered Practice for Disabled Children. The Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 12(2), 213-233.
  7. H. J. Shin & H. K. Lee. (2009). A Study on the Perception Type of Family Social Work Practice: Focusing on the Social Workers of Community Welfare Center. The Korean Journal of Community Welfare, 28, 157-180.
  8. E. J. Jung. (2011). A Study on the Gap Between Knowing the Importance of and the Actual Implemenatation of Family-centered Practices. The Korean Journal of Family Welfare, 16(2), 67-93.
  9. Laird. J. (1995). Family-centered Practice in the Postmodern Ara. Families in society, 76(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/104438949507600303
  10. Kyler, Panelpha L. (2008). Client-Centered and Family-Centered Care: Refinement of the Concepts. Occupational. Therapy in mental health, 76(2), 150-162.
  11. Miriam Mc. Johnson.(1999). Multiple Dimensions of Family-Centered Practice in Residential Group Care: Implications Regarding the Roles of Stakeholders. Child & Youth Care Forum, 28(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021993222772
  12. P. H. Epley, J. A. Summers & A. P. Turnbull. (2010). Characteristics and Trends in Family-Centered Conceptualizations. Journal of Family Social Work, 13, 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522150903514017
  13. Korea Association of Social Welfare center https://kaswc.or.kr:446/
  14. C. Zhang. (2000). Family Service Delivery in Early Head Start:Perspectives of Professionals in Sixstates. Dissertation in the Illinois University.
  15. E. H. Choi. (2012). A Survey Awareness On Instructional Competencies Of Cyber Education For Elementary and Middle School Using An Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA):Kyounggi-do Cyber Home Learning participating teacher target. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 33(1), 187-210. DOI : 10.18612/cnujes.2012.33.1.187
  16. G. Y. Hur & M. S. Kim. (2003). Recognition of the Family-centered Practice of Special infant Teachers and related Professionals. Workers of Community Welfare Center. Special Education Research, 37(4), 319-333.