DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of vibratory stimulus on pain perception during intraoral local anesthesia administration in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Received : 2020.07.13
  • Accepted : 2020.10.25
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of vibration as a counter-stimulatory measure in reducing subjective pain due to local anesthesia administration in children. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid SP, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched until April 2020. Studies were screened by titles and abstracts, followed by full text evaluation of the included studies. Results: A total of seven studies involving 376 children aged 5-17 years were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis compared vibration as a counter-stimulatory measure with no vibration as a comparator. The primary outcome evaluated was pain perception or subjective pain reported by the child. The secondary outcome evaluated was objective pain evaluated in each study. The pooled mean difference favored vibration to be effective for the first outcome. Conclusion: Within the limits of this systematic review, low quality evidence suggests that vibration as a counter-stimulatory measure is effective in reducing the subjective pain reported by children during local anesthesia administration.

Keywords

References

  1. van Wijk AJ, Hoogstraten J. Anxiety and pain during dental injections. J Dent 2009; 37: 700-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.05.023
  2. Dasarraju RK, Svsg N. Comparative efficacy of three topical anesthetics on 7-11-year-old children: a randomized clinical study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2020; 20: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.1.29
  3. Ujaoney S, Mamtani M, Thakre T, Tote J, Hazarey V, Hazarey P, et al. Efficacy trial of camouflage syringe to reduce dental fear and anxiety. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013; 14: 273-8.
  4. Melwani AM, Srinivasan I, Setty JV, D R MK, Pamnani SS, Lalitya D. A clinical comparative study between conventional and camouflaged syringes to evaluate behavior and anxiety in 6-11-year-old children during local anesthesia administration-a novel approach. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2018; 18: 35-40. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.1.35
  5. Peretz B, Gluck GM. Assessing an active distracting technique for local anesthetic injection in pediatric dental patients: Repeated deep breathing and blowing out air. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 24: 5-8.
  6. Kamath PS. A novel distraction technique for pain management during local anesthesia administration in pediatric patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013; 38: 45-7. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.38.1.265807t236570hx7
  7. Tirupathi S, Krishna N, Rajasekhar S, Nuvvula S. Eye movement distraction: a new distraction technique for management of dental anxiety during intraoral local anesthesia administration in children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12: 507-9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1690
  8. Liu Y, Gu Z, Wang Y, Wu Q, Chen V, Xu X, et al. Effect of audiovisual distraction on the management of dental anxiety in children: a systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent 2019; 29: 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12430
  9. Chopra R, Jindal G, Sachdev V, Sandhu M. Double-blind crossover study to compare pain experience during inferior alveolar nerve block administration using buffered two percent lidocaine in children. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38: 25-9.
  10. Meincken M, Norman C, Arevalo O, Saman DM, Bejarano T. Anesthesia onset time and injection pain between buffered and unbuffered lidocaine used as local anesthetic for dental care in children. Pediatr Dent 2019; 41: 354-7.
  11. Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Effect of warming local anesthesia solutions before intraoral administration in dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2020; 20: 187-94. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.187
  12. Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Effect of precooling on pain during local anesthesia administration in children: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2020; 20: 119-27. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.3.119
  13. Dickenson AH. Gate control theory of pain stands the test of time. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 755-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/88.6.755
  14. Bagherian A, Sheikhfathollahi M. Children's behavioral pain reactions during local anesthetic injection using cotton-roll vibration method compared with routine topical anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2016; 13: 272-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.182189
  15. Shahidi Bonjar AH. Syringe micro vibrator (smv) a new device being introduced in dentistry to alleviate pain and anxiety of intraoral injections, and a comparative study with a similar device. Ann Surg Innov Res 2011; 5: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-5-1
  16. Roeber B, Wallace DP, Rothe V, Salama F, Allen KD. Evaluation of the effects of the vibraject attachment on pain in children receiving local anesthesia. Pediatr Dent 2011; 33: 46-50.
  17. Nasehi A, Bhardwaj S, Kamath AT, Gadicherla S, Pentapati KC. Clinical pain evaluation with intraoral vibration device during local anesthetic injections. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: e23-7.
  18. Ching D, Finkelman M, Loo CY. Effect of the dentalvibe injection system on pain during local anesthesia injections in adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent 2014; 36: 51-5.
  19. Shilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Sakthivel R, Selvaraju G, Vijayakumar P. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015; 33: 173-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.160343
  20. Hassanein PH, Khalil A, Talaat DM. Pain assessment during mandibular nerve block injection with the aid of dental vibe tool in pediatric dental patients: a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2020; 51: 310-7.
  21. Tung J, Carillo C, Udin R, Wilson M, Tanbonliong T. Clinical performance of the dentalvibe injection system on pain perception during local anesthesia in children. J Dent Child (Chic) 2018; 85: 51-7.
  22. Tandon S, Kalia G, Sharma M, Mathur R, Rathore K, Gandhi M. Comparative evaluation of mucosal vibrator with topical anesthetic gel to reduce pain during administration of local anesthesia in pediatric patients: An in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018; 11: 261-5. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1523
  23. Raslan N, Masri R. A randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels during three types of oral anesthetic injections and the effect of dentalvibe() on injection pain in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2018; 28: 102-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12313
  24. Elbay M, Sermet Elbay U, Yildirim S, Ugurluel C, Kaya C, Baydemir C. Comparison of injection pain caused by the dentalvibe injection system versus a traditional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2015; 16: 123-8.
  25. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 45: 139-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002
  26. Bilsin E, Gungormus Z, Gungormus M. The efficacy of external cooling and vibration on decreasing the pain of local anesthesia injections during dental treatment in children: a randomized controlled study. J Perianesth Nurs 2020; 35: 44-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2019.06.007
  27. Hegde KM, R N, Srinivasan I, D R MK, Melwani A, Radhakrishna S. Effect of vibration during local anesthesia administration on pain, anxiety, and behavior of pediatric patients aged 6-11 years: a crossover split-mouth study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2019; 19: 143-9. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.3.143
  28. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Balayi Gajan E. The efficacy of distraction and counterstimulation in the reduction of pain reaction to intraoral injection by pediatric patients. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9: 33-40.
  29. Alanazi KJ, Pani S, AlGhanim N. Efficacy of external cold and a vibrating device in reducing discomfort of dental injections in children: a split mouth randomised crossover study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2019; 20: 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0399-8