Educational Technology International

  • 제21권2호
  • /
  • Pages.193-216
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating Good Teaching and Learning Experiences in the Perspectives of University Students through Social Network Analysis

  • 투고 : 2020.09.05
  • 심사 : 2020.09.24
  • 발행 : 2020.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study investigated university students' perspectives on good class and instructional practices through social network analysis. The subjects were 321 students in the third and fourth academic years in a Korean university. The subjects completed four open-ended questions, asking about experience of good class, good instructors' teaching practice, and their feelings and attitudes when participating in good class. As social network analysis, KrKwic (Korea Key Words in Context) was used to compute word frequencies and analyze semantic network structures and Ucinet Netdraw to assess centrality in the social network, consisting of degree centrality, closeness centrality, and between centrality. The results are as follows. First, students showed 5 keywords to depict what good class is, including 'understanding', 'example', 'video', 'interest', and 'communication'. Second, the characteristics of teaching methods by professors who practice good class indicate 'assignments', 'questions', 'understanding', 'example', and 'feedback'. Third, the top 5 keywords of students' attitudes as participating in good class are 'active', 'participation', 'focus', 'listening', and 'asking'. Last, keywords depicting desirable class that students most wanted to take next time are 'assignments', 'rewards', 'understanding', 'difficulty', and 'interest'. The findings from this study include the meanings of the semantic network structures of words in the text making up messages. Also this study can provide empirical evidence for educators and educational practitioners in higher education to create effective learning environments.

키워드

과제정보

This study was conducted by research funds from Gwangju University in 2020.

참고문헌

  1. Baek, K. M. (2017). A survey on elementary school teachers' and students' perception of Hilbert Meyer Good Teaching. The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, 24(1), 1-26.
  2. Cho, S. H., & Cho, Y. H. (2018). What makes lectures in university excellent? : Identifying the characteristics by semantic network analysis. The Journal of Research in Education, 31(4), 1-23.
  3. Choi, M. G. (2016). Student's perception of good instruction of major and liberal arts subjects. Korean Journal of General Education, 10(3), 325-348.
  4. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 35-41.
  5. Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Goodreau, S. M. (2014). Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: A primer for social network analysis in education research. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0162
  6. Heo, G. (2009). A case study on analysis of field excellent class through flanders interaction system. Journal of Fishries and Marine Sciences Education, 21(4), 499-507.
  7. Im, S., & You, Y.-M. (2018). A critical discourse analysis on the 'Quality College Classes'. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 1079-1112. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.34.4.1079
  8. Jeong, E. I. (2010). Perceptions by teachers and students of good teaching at college. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 22(3), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2010.22.3.25
  9. Khandelwal, K. A. (2009). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom: A critical incident technique from students' perspective. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 299-309.
  10. Ki, S. H., Kim, K. H., & Ryu, J. H. (2019). A semantic network analysis on the perception of teaching competencies of pre-service teachers on teaching practice. Teacher Education Research, 58(4), 699-711. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.58.4.201912.699
  11. Kim, K. H., & Kang, S. B. (2019). An exploratory study of university freshmen's perceptions of class choice and good teaching. Culture and Convergence, 41(6), 415-444.
  12. Kim, M. J., & Choi, D. Y. (2019). Exploring the Learning Experience in Conversation Simulation Based on Virtual Environment through Using Semantic Network Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 107-137. https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.35.2.107
  13. Kim, Y. H. (2010). Social network theory. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  14. Kwak, K. Y. (2017). Social network analysis. Seoul: Chung ram.
  15. Lee, H. J., Yun, G, Y., & Park, I. W. (2017). A study on college student's course selecting standards: Focusing on electives and major courses. The Korean Educational Review, 23(4), 79-99.
  16. Min H. R., & Lee, H. W. (2012). The characteristics of good teaching based on the students' awareness: The comparative analysis of actual learning experiences between a university in Korea and oversea universities. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 19(1), 57-88.
  17. Noh, J. Y. (2019). Difference of course enrollment standard according to learner characteristics in university general education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(14), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.14.483
  18. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
  19. Park, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis, 6(5), 1377-1387.
  20. Park, M. J. (2008). Students' perceptions of good teaching in higher education -An essay-review of college students. The Journal of Humanities Studies, 75, 229-253.
  21. Park, R. G. (2001). A study on the selection alternative of basic and major courses for college students. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 6(1), 48-55.
  22. Ryu, K. U., & Shin, W. S. (2012). Analyses of the satisfaction with general education and factors influencing the selection of courses. The Journal of Research in Education, 45, 31-54.
  23. Shim, M. J. (2012). The exploration on new direction of consulting for good teaching. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(2), 371-396.
  24. Son, Y. A., Yoon, J. H., Maeng, H. J. (2018). The current status of evaluation method utilization according to instructional types and instructors' perceptions about purpose of the learning evaluation by university major field. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(3). 5-24. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.3.5
  25. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, United Kingdom: NY: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Watering, G., & Rijt, J. (2006). Teachers and students' perceptions of assessments: A review and a study into the ability and accuracy of estimating the difficultly levels of assessment items. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.05.001