DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do the Technostress Creators Predict Job Satisfaction and Teacher Efficacy of Primary School Teachers in Korea?

  • Received : 2020.02.17
  • Accepted : 2020.03.24
  • Published : 2020.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the predictive powers of the five technostress creators - techno-overload, techno-invasion, techno-complexity, techno-insecurity, and techno-uncertainty - in job satisfaction and teacher efficacy of primary school teachers in Korea when they incorporated mobile technology into teaching. A questionnaire was designed to measure the level of teacher's stress from technology, job satisfaction and teacher efficacy. Data were collected from 164 teachers. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to explain which area of technostress led to varying degrees of job satisfaction and teacher efficacy. The results showed that techno-complexity alone predicted both job satisfaction and teacher efficacy. The reason why techno-complexity was the only predictor is that teachers would have first needed to understand how to incorporate mobile technology into teaching, before feeling overloaded, invaded, insecure, or uncertain about it, meaning techno-complexity precedes other constructs. Therefore, the only stress factor that affected them was how to understand the complexity of mobile technology. This calls for adequate training and support from schools and governments in order for the teachers to fully incorporate technology into teaching.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, D. H. (2010). Constructing a creative self-efficacy inventory: A mixedmethods inquiry. Dissertation. University of Nebraska.
  2. Ahmad, U. N. U., Amin, S. M., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2012). The relationship between technostress creators and organisational commitment among academic librarians. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.179
  3. Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.004
  4. Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers' preparedness for teaching with technology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (pp. 1602-1608). Charlottesville, VA : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  5. Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017
  6. Alger, C., & Kopcha, T. J. (2010). Technology supported cognitive apprenticeship transforms the student teaching field experience: Improving the student teaching field experience for all triad members. The Teacher Educator, 46(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2010.529986
  7. Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 17(2), 86-95.
  8. Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718403500507
  9. Ashton, P., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, USA: Longman Publishing Group.
  10. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, USA: Freeman.
  12. Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2001). How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 434-445. https://doi.org/10.1162/00346530152480081
  13. Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Reading, USA: Addison Wesley.
  14. Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.1998.143059.x
  15. Chen, L. (2015). Validating the technostress instrument using a sample of Chinese knowledge workers. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 24(1), 65-82.
  16. Chung, M. H., Rho, H. O., & Yoo, I. (2013). The impacts of technostress on IS strain and performance expectancy among information system users. The Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 35(4), 121-142.
  17. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1992.9943869
  18. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 145-158.
  19. Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (1998). A three domain model of teacher and school executive career satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239810211545
  20. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1989). A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Science, 35(10), 1151-1171. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1151
  21. Evans, E. D., & Tribble, M. (1986). Perceived teaching problems, self-efficacy, and commitment to teaching among pre-service teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(2), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1986.10885728
  22. Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., Griffiths, D., Johnson, M., Sharples, P., & Sherlock, D. (2014). Problems and opportunities in the use of technology to manage informal learning. In F. J. Garcia-Penalvo (Ed.), In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 573-580). New York, USA: ACM.
  23. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.76.4.569
  24. Glickman, C. D., & Tamashiro, R. T. (1982). A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving. Psychology in the Schools, 19(4), 558-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198210)19:4<558::AID-PITS2310190426>3.0.CO;2-F
  25. Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2008). Integrating technology for meaningful learning (5th ed.). Boston, USA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  26. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  27. Jena, R. K. (2015). Technostress in ICT enabled collaborative learning environment: An empirical study among Indian academician. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1116-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.020
  28. Jhurree, V. (2005). Technology integration in education in developing countries: Guidelines to policy makers. International Education Journal, 6(4), 467-483.
  29. Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003). The schools that teachers choose. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 20-24.
  30. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers' technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004
  31. Kent, T. W., & McNergney, R. F. (1999). Will technology really change education? From blackboard to web. Thousand Oaks, USA: Corwin Press.
  32. Kim, A. Y., & Kim, M. J. (2004). Validation of teacher-efficacy scale. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 18(1), 37-58.
  33. Kim, Y., & Cho, Y. H. (2014). The second leap toward "world class" education in Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 783-794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0144-3
  34. Kim, I., & Loadman, W. E. (1994). Predicting Teacher Job Satisfaction. Columbus, USA: Ohio State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED383707)
  35. Kim, K. A., & Kim, S. H. (2014). Effects of technostress on job satisfaction, task flow and continuous flow. The Korea Society of Management information Systems, 143-154.
  36. Kim, S. J., & Kim, H. J. (2016). Analysis of trends in research of technology-based student-centered learning environment in Korea school education. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 611-641. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.3.611
  37. Kim, Y. (2013). A study of primary school teachers' awareness of digital textbooks and their acceptance of digital textbooks based on the technology acceptance model. The Journal of Digital Policy & Management, 11(2), 9-18.
  38. Klecker, B., & Loadman, W. E. (1996). Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacher job satisfaction. A Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association. Chicago, USA: Retrieved 10 September, 2016 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED400254.pdf
  39. Knight, C., Knight, B., & Teghe, D. (2006). Releasing the pedagogical power of information and communication technology for learners: A case study. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 2(2).
  40. Korean Educational Statistics Service (2016). 2015 Educational Statistics. Seoul, Korea: Retrieved November 1, 2016, from http://kess.kedi.re.kr/index
  41. Korea's Ministry of Education (2016). 2015 National Curriculum of Korea. Seoul, Korea: Retrieved November 1, 2016, from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/100020/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=141&boardSeq=63432
  42. Lee, H. J. (1998). A study on a teacher-efficacy scale development. (Unpublished master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  43. Lee, J. Y. (2018). Mediating effect of stress coping in the relationship between technostress and teacher efficacy of early childhood teachers. Korean Journal of Stress Research, 26(1), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2018.26.1.46
  44. Lee, Y. S., & Lee, H. S. (2012). The relationship among school organizational health, personal teacher efficacy, collective teacher efficacy and teaching professionalism. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(4), 541-564. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2012.29.4.541
  45. Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003
  46. Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
  47. Miskel, C., & Heller, L. (1973). The educational work components study: An adapted set of measures for work motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 42(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1973.11011443
  48. Motshegwe, M. M. & Batane, T. (2015). Factors influencing instructors' attitudes toward technology integration. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(1), 1-16.
  49. Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning: Report 11. Bristol, England: Futurelab.
  50. Park, J. P., & Choi, Y. E. (2013). Technostress creators and its influence on employees in organizations. Journal of the Korea Society of IT Services, 12(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2013.12.2.055
  51. Ragu-Nathan, B. S., Tarafdar, M., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2008). The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
  52. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into education. New York, USA: Pearson.
  53. Roh, J. (2001). Conceptualizing and measuring job satisfaction of teachers. The Korean Society for the Study of Educational Administration, 19(2), 163-181.
  54. Russell, G., & Bradley, G. (1997). Teachers' computer anxiety: Implications for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 2(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018680322904
  55. Saettler, L. P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, USA: Libraries Unlimited.
  56. Sahin, I., Akturk, A., & Schmidt, D. (2009). Impact of preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge on their vocational self-efficacy beliefs. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4137-4144).
  57. Scheopner, A. J. (2010). Irreconcilable differences: Teacher attrition in public and catholic schools. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.03.001
  58. Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00359.x
  59. Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555313
  60. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
  61. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
  62. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.006
  63. Smith, M. J., & Carayon, P. (1995). New technology, automation, and work organization: stress problems and improved technology implementation strategies. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.4530050107
  64. So, Y. H (2013). Development and validation of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) scale for elementary school teachers. The Journal of Education Research, 11(1), 157-175.
  65. Somvir, S. K. (2012). Job satisfaction among library professionals in Haryana state. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(5), 1-5.
  66. Stevenson, M. P., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.233-259
  67. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  68. Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ... The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2).
  69. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  70. Vladut, C., & Kallay, E. (2010). Work stress, personal life, and burnout. Causes, consequences, possible remedies-A theoretical review. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 261-280.
  71. Yang, X., Ge, C., Hu, B., Chi, T., & Wang, L. (2009). Relationship between quality of life and occupational stress among teachers. Public Health, 123(11), 750-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2009.09.018
  72. Yim, M. S., & Han, K. H. (2013). An investigation of causes and effects of technostress creators. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(10), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.10.031
  73. Zembylas, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2006). Sources of teacher job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in Cyprus. Compare, 36(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920600741289