Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Type and Dimension of a Faculty-Student Interaction: Narrative study focused

대학생활에서 이루어지는 교수-학생 상호작용에 관한 유형 분석 연구: 내러티브 분석 중심

  • Received : 2020.08.31
  • Accepted : 2020.12.04
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study identified the types and dimensions of faculty-student interaction (FSI). A narrative methodology was applied within the qualitative research paradigm. Data was collected using individual in-depth interviews involving 10 students who had experiences of faculty-student interaction more than 6 times over the prior 6 semesters. Data was analyzed according to actors' perspectives, the motivation of actions, and actions toward goal achievement. Three major types of faculty-student interactions emerged from our analysis. First, the initiative interaction type reflects active characteristics of the narrator within FSI and is goal achievement-oriented. Second, the stereotyped interaction was characterized as a unified reaction to the FSI and not significantly related to self-development. Lastly, the reciprocal interaction reflected characteristics of narrators who had potential and flexibility for self-development in the circumstances involving support from professors. The results of this study indicate that faculty-student interaction does not represent the best way to support students for their successful school lives. Faculty needs professionality and sensitivity for student teaching, and students must exhibit curiosity and activeness in developing their knowledge. Positive outcomes from the FSI will be expected in supportive school environments.

본 연구는 지도교수를 중심으로 한 학생상담을 통해 이루어지고 있는 교수학생간 상호작용의 작동원리를 파악하고 유형화하고자 함이다. 이를 위해 질적연구방법 중 내러티브연구방법을 적용하여 교수학생간 상호작용 경험 속에 나타나고 있는 구조적 패턴과 기전을 파악해 보고자 하였다. 연구참여자는 학과소속 지도교수로부터 년 2회 총 6회 이상 학생상담을 경험한 4학년 여학생 10명을 대상으로 하였으며 심층인터뷰와 현장노트를 통해 자료를 수집하였다. 인터뷰 자료는 Burke(1945)가 내러티브 분석에서 사용한 행위주체, 행위동기, 행위결과를 중심축으로 자료를 분석하였으며 최종 도출된 상호작용 유형은 주도적 상호작용, 피상적 상호작용, 보은적 상호작용이다. 주도적 상호작용 유형은 학생이 교수와의 상호작용을 통해 성취지향적인 자아성자의 일면을 강하게 나타내고 있는 유형이다. 반면 피상적 상호작용 유형에서는 교수와의 교류를 통해 자아성장의 경험이 강하게 피력되지 않고 있는 특성이 있으며, 마지막 보은적 상호작용 유형은 정서지향적 측면을 중심으로 한 자아성장의 일면을 강하게 나타내는 특성을 지니고 있다. 세가지 상호작용 유형을 통해 교수자와 학생 모두 서로 발전시킬 수 있는 모델이 무엇이며 어떠한 노력이 필요한지 지도교수 중심 학생 상담의 순기능과 역기능에 대해 되새겨볼 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. H.R. Kim, "A study on developmental factors influencing college adjustment-focused on autonomy, social connectedness and career self efficacy", Journal of School Social Work, Vol.24, pp.85-105, 2013.
  2. J. Park, S. Park, "Influence of college adjustment and social support on career development level of college students who majors in health or social welfare", Korean J Clin Lab Soi, Vol.49, No. 2, pp. 180-186, 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2017.49.2.180
  3. M. H. Han, "Factors affecting college adatation and academic achievement in nursing students", Journal of Health informatics and Statistics, Vol.42, No.1, pp.36-43, 2017. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2017.1.36
  4. S. Kim, J. Ko, "The effects of individual and Institutional characteristics on student-faculty interaction", Korean Journal of Educational Research, Vol.54, No.4, pp.263-293, 2016.
  5. E. Pascarella, P. Terenzini, "How college affects students(vol.2): A third decade of research" San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2005.
  6. J. Hong, S. Bae, "The relationship between faculty-student interaction and institutional commitment of students", Korean Journal of Educational Administration, Vol.33, No.3, pp. 351-379. 2015.
  7. T. Campbell, D. Campbell, "Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention", Research in Higher Education, Vol.38, No.6, pp. 727-742, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024911904627
  8. V. Tinto, "Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition", Chicago: university Press, 1993.
  9. J. Do, "The effect of major satisfaction and faculty-student interaction of university students majoring Dance on their school life", Official Journal of Korean Society of Dance Science, Vol.34, No.4, pp.69-82, 2017.
  10. S.Bae, H. Jang, H. S, "The study on the undergraduate school education and analysis", KNIGE RR-2013:120-566, 2013
  11. D. Kuh, S. Hu, "The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s", Review of Higher Education, Vol.24, No.3, pp.309-332, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0005
  12. J.Choi, H. Shin, "The study on the characteristics of professor-student interactions and performance outcomes in the university", Korean Educational Research, Vol.37, No.2, pp.132-154, 2010.
  13. H. Rhu, J.Ko, H. Nam, "A study on the analysis of the factors to communication and comprehensive thinking skills of university school students", Korean Educational Administration Research, Vol.29, No.4, pp.319-337, 2011
  14. B. Choi, H. Yu, H. Byun, "The influences of faculty perception of belonging college on their interaction with students". The Korean Educational Review, Vol.22, No.1, pp.53-76, 2016.
  15. S. D. Nam, "Faculty-student interaction" In KEDRTI Report(VII), RR 2019-9: 170-276, 2019
  16. H. Seon, C. Ha, "The development of the college adjustment inventory at the middle level college of a provincial University", CNU Journal of Educational studies, Vol.34, No.1, pp.209-226, 2013. https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2013.34.1.209
  17. Academy Information[internet]. Available From: https://www.academyinfo.go.kr/search/search.do (Accessed Aug, 02, 2020)
  18. B. Yih, M. Yi, "The lifestories of Elderly Korean Women with Urinary Incontinence: A narrative Study Approach", J Korean Acad Nurs, Vol.39, No.2, pp.237-248, 2009. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.2.237
  19. J .I. Lee, "Narrative style and marital life: Thelife stories of korean women". Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul. 2004
  20. H. A. Maxwell. "Qualitative research design: An interactive approach". p.69-76, California. Sage. 1996.
  21. M. Sandelowski. "The problem of rigor in qualitative research", American Nursing Science, Vol.8, No.3, pp.27-37, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005
  22. K. Burke, "Introduction: The five key terms of dramatism. In B. Kenneth(Ed.), A grammar of movies(pp.1-2)", New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, 1945
  23. N. R. Goldberger., J. M. Tarule., B. M. Clinchy, M. F. Belenky, "Knowledge, difference, and power: Essays inspired by women's way of knowing", NewYork, NY: Basic Book: A Division of Harper Collins, 1986.
  24. H. C. Yong, K. Y, Hwang, "Process of consciousness and counselling psychological paradigm-Transpersonal psychological review", Korean Journal of East West Science, Vol.7, pp.27-42, 2004.
  25. D. E. Han. "The trends of intrinsic motivation and its perspectives", Studies in Social Psychology, Vol.2, pp.54-93, 1984.