Korean Chemical Engineering Research

  • 제58권1호
  • /
  • Pages.150-162
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 0304-128X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-9558(eISSN)
한국화학공학회 (The Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

KEPCO-China Huaneng Post-combustion CO2 Capture Pilot Test and Cost Evaluation

  • Lee, Ji Hyun (Creative Future Laboratory, KEPCO Research Institute) ;
  • Kwak, NoSang (Creative Future Laboratory, KEPCO Research Institute) ;
  • Niu, Hongwei (Beijing Key Laboratory of CO2 capture and Treatment, China Huaneng Group Clean Energy Institute) ;
  • Wang, Jinyi (Beijing Key Laboratory of CO2 capture and Treatment, China Huaneng Group Clean Energy Institute) ;
  • Wang, Shiqing (Beijing Key Laboratory of CO2 capture and Treatment, China Huaneng Group Clean Energy Institute) ;
  • Shang, Hang (Beijing Key Laboratory of CO2 capture and Treatment, China Huaneng Group Clean Energy Institute) ;
  • Gao, Shiwang (Beijing Key Laboratory of CO2 capture and Treatment, China Huaneng Group Clean Energy Institute)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.12
  • 심사 : 2019.10.30
  • 발행 : 2020.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The proprietary post-combustion CO2 solvent (KoSol) developed by the Korea Electric Power Research Institute (KEPRI) was applied at the Shanghai Shidongkou CO2 Capture Pilot Plant (China Huaneng CERI, capacity: 120,000 ton CO2/yr) of the China Huaneng Group (CHNG) for performance evaluation. The key results of the pilot test and data on the South Korean/Chinese electric power market were used to calculate the predicted cost of CO2 avoided upon deployment of CO2 capture technology in commercial-scale coal-fired power plants. Sensitivity analysis was performed for the key factors. It is estimated that, in the case of South Korea, the calculated cost of CO2 avoided for an 960 MW ultra-supercritical (USC) coal-fired power plant is approximately 35~44 USD/tCO2 (excluding CO2 transportation and storage costs). Conversely, applying the same technology to a 1,000 MW USC coal-fired power plant in Shanghai, China, results in a slightly lower cost (32~42 USD/tCO2). This study confirms the importance of international cooperation that takes into consideration the geographical locations and the performance of CO2 capture technology for the involved countries in the process of advancing the economic efficiency of large-scale CCS technology aimed to reduce greenhouse gases

키워드

참고문헌

  1. IEA, The Potential for Equipping Chinas Existing Coal Fleet with Carbon Capture and Storage., International Energy Agency (2016).
  2. Hu, B. and Zhai, H., The Cost of Carbon Capture and Storage for Coal-fired Power Plants in China, Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 65, 23-31(2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.08.009
  3. Zhai, H. and Rubin, E. S., "Comparative Performance and Cost Assessments of Coal and Natural-Gas-Fired Power Plants under a $CO_2$ Emission Performance Standard Regulation," Energy Fuels., 27(8), 4290-4301(2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef302018v
  4. Tollefson, J., "Low-cost Carbon-capture Project Sparks Interest," Nature, 469, 276-277(2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/469276a
  5. DOE/NETL, Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1a: Bituminous Coal (PC) and Natural Gas to Electricity. DOE/NETL-2015/1723(2015).
  6. IEA, Carbon Capture and Storage: The solution for deep emissions reductions, International Energy Agency(2015).
  7. Projected costs of generating electricity. International Energy Agency (2015).
  8. Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E. and Herzog, H. J., "The Cost of $CO_2$ Capture and Storage," Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 40, 378-400(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018
  9. Nelson, T. O., Atish Kataria, Paul Mobley, Mustapha Soukri, Jak Tanthana, RTI's Solid Sorbent-Based $CO_2$ Capture Process: Technical and Economic Lessons Learned for Application in Coal-fired, NGCC, and Cement Plants," Energy Procedia, 114, 2506-2524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1409
  10. Lockwood, T., "A Compararitive Review of Next-generation Carbon Capture Technologies for Coal-fired Power Plant," Energy Procedia, 114, 2658-2670 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1850
  11. Nwaoha, C., David W. Smith, Raphael Idem, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul, "Process Simulation and Parametric Sensitivity Study of $CO_2$ Capture from 115 MW Coal-fired Power Plant Using MEA-DEA Blend," Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 76, 1-11(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.06.006
  12. Nwaoha, C., Martin Beaulieu, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul, Mark D. Gibsom, "Techno-economic Analysis of $CO_2$ Capture from a 1.2 million MTPA Cement Plant using AMP-PZ-MEA Blend," Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 78, 400-412(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.015
  13. Idem, R., et al., "Practical Experience in Post-combustion $CO_2$ Capture using Reactive Solvents in Large Pilot and Demonstration Plants," Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 40, 6-25(2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.005
  14. Rubin, E. S., et al., Toward a Common Method of Cost Estimation for $CO_2$ capture and Storage at Fossil Fuel Power Plant. IEA GHG(2013).
  15. Bolland, O. and Undrum, H., "A Novel Methodology for Comparing $CO_2$ Capture Options for Natural Gas-fired Combined Cycle Plants," Adv. Environ. Res., 7(4), 901-911(2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00085-0
  16. Lee, J. H., Kwak, N. S., Lee, I. Y., Jang, K. R., Lee, D. W., Jang, S. G., Kim, B. K. and Shim, J.-G., "Performance and Economic Analysis of Commercial-scale Coal-fired Power Plant with Postcombustion $CO_2$ Capture," Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(5), 800- 807(2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0267-0
  17. Wang, J. and Xu, S., "$CO_2$ Capture RD&D Proceedings in China Huaneng Group," Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol., 1(1), 129-134(2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-014-0013-6
  18. Lee, J. H., Kwak, N. S., et al., Highly efficient absorbents for acidic gas separation, Korean Patent No.10-1630054(2016).
  19. Boreyong power plant design spec., KOMIPO(2015).
  20. Chakma, A., "$CO_2$ Capture Processes-Opportunites for Improved Energy Efficiencies," Energ. Convers. Manage., 38, 551-556(1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00064-7
  21. Nguyen, T., M. Hilliard, and G.T. Rochelle, "Amine Volatility in $CO_2$ Capture," Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 4(5), 707-715(2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.003
  22. Abu-Zahra, M. R. M., et al., "$CO_2$ Capture from Power Plants: Part I. A Parametric Study of the Technical Performance based on Monoethanolamine," Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con., 1(1), 37-46(2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(06)00007-7
  23. KDI. Feasibility study on publicly financed projects. Available from: http://pimac.kdi.re.kr/cooperation/notice_view.jsp?seq_no=9327&pageNo=17&showListSize=20(2007).
  24. Lee, J. H., Jay, H., Park, I. K. and Lee, C. H., "Techno-economic and Environmental Evaluation of $CO_2$ Mineralization Technology Based on Bench-scale Experiments," J. $CO_2$ Util., 26, 522-536 (2018).
  25. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG), Criteria for technical and economic assessment of plants with low $CO_2$ emissions, IEAGHG(2009).
  26. MIT, CCS Project Database(2019).
  27. IHS, Power Capital Cost Index. IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Cambridge, MA(2018).
  28. KEEI, Trends of imported coal price in South Korea, KEEI(2018).
  29. Dave, N., Do, T., Palfreyman, D., Feron, P. H. M., Xu, S., Gao, S. and Liu, L., "Post-combustion Capture of $CO_2$ from Coalfired Power Plants in China and Australia: An Experience based Cost Comparison," Energy Procedia, 4, 1869-1877(2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.065
  30. Jean-Francois Leandri, P. P. and Adrian Skea, C. B., Cost Assessment of Fossil Power Plants Equipped with CCS under Typical Scenarios in Power-Gen Europe, Milan, Italy(2011).
  31. Rubin, E. S. and Zhai, H., "The Cost of Carbon Capture and Storage for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants," Environ. Sci. Technol, 46(6), 3076-84(2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/es204514f
  32. Rubin, E. S., Chen, C. and Rao, A. B., "Cost and Performance of Fossil Fuel Power Plants with $CO_2$ Capture and Storage," Energy Policy, 35(9), 4444-4454(2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.009

피인용 문헌

  1. A review of research facilities, pilot and commercial plants for solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture: Packed bed, phase-change and rotating processes vol.111, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103474