국제초고층학회논문집 (International Journal of High-Rise Buildings)

  • 제9권4호
  • /
  • Pages.307-314
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2234-7224(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9930(eISSN)
한국초고층도시건축학회 (Council on Tall Building and Urban Habitat Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance of High-rise Moment-resisting RC Frame Structures with Vertical Setback

  • Jiang, Huanjun (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Huang, Youlu (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Li, Wannian (China Resources Land Limited)
  • 발행 : 2020.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

High-rise buildings with vertical setback are widely used in practice. From the field investigation of the past earthquakes, it was found that such kind of vertically irregular high-rise building structures easily suffer severe damage during strong earthquakes. This paper presents an extensive study on the earthquake responses of moment-resisting frame structures (MFS) popularly applied in high-rise buildings with vertical setback. Four groups of MFS are designed, including three groups of structures with vertical setback and one group of structures with the lateral stiffness varying along the building height but without vertical setback. The numerical models of the structures are established, and the time history analysis of the structures under different levels of earthquakes is conducted. The earthquake responses of the structures are compared. The influence of the ratio between the horizontal setback dimension and the previous plan dimension, the eccentricity of setback, and the position where the setback occurs on the seismic performance of structures is studied. The rationality of the provisions for the structures with vertical setback specified in the current design codes is checked by the findings from this study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASCE 7. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston.
  2. Cui, J. D., and Shen, X. L. (2017). Perform-3D theory and tutorials. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China. (in chinese).
  3. DGJ08-9. (2013). Code for seismic design of buildings. Committee for Urban-Rural Construction and Transportation, Shanghai, China. (in chinese).
  4. Eurocode 8. (2004). Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for building. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
  5. FEMA 356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  6. GB 50010. (2010). Code for design of concrete structures. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China. (in chinese).
  7. GB 50011. (2010). Code for seismic design of buildings. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China. (in chinese).
  8. IS 1893-1. (2002). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
  9. Kim, S. J., and Elnashai, A. S. (2009). Characterization of shaking intensity distribution and seismic assessment of RC buildings for the Kashmir (Pakistan) earthquake of October 2005. Engineering Structures, 31: 2998-3015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.001
  10. Lew, M., Naeim, F., Carpenter, L. D., Youssef, N. F., Rojas, F., Saragoni, G. R., Adaros, M. S. (2010). The significance of the 27 February 2010 Offshore Maule, Chile earthquake. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 19: 826-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.668