The Korean Journal of Franchise Management (한국프랜차이즈경영연구)

Korea Society of Franchise Management (한국프랜차이즈경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Brand Popularity in a Foreign Market on Consumer Behavior in a Franchise Cosmetic Retailer's Online Shop

  • Received : 2019.02.28
  • Accepted : 2020.04.30
  • Published : 2020.06.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: As consumers have difficulty in brand choice due to excessive information, using brand popularity as an advertising cue (e.g., Sales No. 1, Hit Product) has been getting more attention as an effective curation strategy for decreasing consumers' cognitive efforts. Accordingly, recent studies empirically demonstrate that consumers tend to prefer and choose a brand with a popularity cue and offer a useful information regarding how to use a popularity cue in marketing communication. However, extant research has mainly focused on investigating the impact of "brand popularity in a domestic market" on consumer behaviors. Thus, little is known about the effect of "brand popularity in a foreign market" on local consumers' decision-making process. Given that domestic consumers tend to purchase imported products from overseas countries, it can be meaningful information for global companies. Therefore, this research derives and tests the five hypotheses to examine how local consumers respond to brand popularity in a foreign market as an advertising cue. Specifically, it tests the three hypotheses regarding the direct and indirect effects of brand popularity in a foreign market on risk perception and purchase intention. Then, it tests two additional hypotheses about moderating effects of psychic distance on the relationship between brand popularity and risk perception as well as on the relationship between brand popularity and purchase intention. Seventy participants are exposed to an advertisement for an Indian cosmetic brand using a popularity cue in Indian market and answer the questions about brand evaluation. For data analysis, regression analysis is employed. The findings of this research show that perceived brand popularity lowers local consumers' perceived risk with a foreign brand. However, perceived brand popularity does not have a direct impact on purchase intention while it has an indirect effect through perceived risk. Meanwhile, psychic distance moderates the effect of perceived brand popularity on perceived risk level, but it has no impact on the relationship between brand popularity and purchase intention. This research is one of the first studies that demonstrate the positive impact of brand popularity in a foreign market on a local consumer's purchase decision, and it shows the effect can be moderated by psychic distance.

Keywords

References

  1. Beckerman, W. (1956). Distance and the pattern of intraeuropean European trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 38(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925556
  2. Dean, D. H. (1999). Brand endorsement, popularity, and event sponsorship as advertising cues affecting consumer prepurchase attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1999.10673585
  3. Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870379
  4. Evans, J., & Mavondo, F. T. (2002). Psychic distance: The construct and measures. Paper Presented at American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, Chicago, American Marketing Association, 13(Summer), 308-314.
  5. Evans, J., Treadgold, A., & Mavondo, F. (2000). Explaining export development through psychic distance. International Marketing Review, 17(2), 164-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330010322688
  6. Gill, J. D., Gorssbart, S., & Laczniak, R. N. (1988). Influence of involvement, commitment and familiarity on brand beliefs and attitudes of viewers exposed to alternative ad claim strategies. Journal of Advertising, 17(2), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1988.10673111
  7. Hellofs, L. L., & Jacobson, R. (1999). Market share and customers' perception of quality: When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251998
  8. Hu, H., & Krishen, A. S. (2019). When is enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective. Journal of Business Research, 100, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.011
  9. Hwang, H.C. (2009). The effect of perceived risks and performance regarding psychic distance. Journal of Distribution Science, 7(2), 63-88 https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.7.2.200906.63
  10. Ibok, N. I. (2013). Factors determining the effectiveness of celebrity endorsed advertisements: the The case of Nnigerian telecommunication industry. American Journal of Business and Management, 2(3), 233-238.
  11. Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. (1972). The components of perceived risk. The Advances in ssociation for Consumer Reasearch, 3, 382-393.
  12. Kim, C. K., & Chung, J. Y. (1997). Brand popularity, country image and market share: an empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490105
  13. Kim, J. H., & Min, D. W. (2014). The effects of brand popularity as an advertising cue on perceived quality in the context of Internet. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(4), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12055
  14. Kim, J. H., & Min, D. W. (2012). The effects of product brand popularity on quality perception and purchase intention in the context of internet shopping. Journal of Consumption Culture 15(4), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2012.15.4.002
  15. Kim, J. H., & Min, D. W. (2016). Consumers' response to an advertisement using brand popularity in a foreign market. Japanese Psychological Research, 58(4), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12129
  16. Kim J. H. (2018). Effect of brand popularity as an advertising cue on tourists' shopping behavior. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 10, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.07.001
  17. Kim, J. H., & Wang, L. L. (2018). Effect of brand popularity on purchase intention in the context of tourist shopping: Moderating effects of situational involvement and animosity. Journal of Industrial Economical & Trade, 42(1), 35-53.
  18. Lee, T. M., & Kim, D. W. (2008). Consumers' cognitive, affective and behavioral responses to hit product awards as extrinsic cue: The moderating role of product involvement and product type. Korean Journal of Marketing, 23(4), 71-103.
  19. Luan, J., Shan, W., Wang, Y., & Xiao, J. (2019). How easy-to-process information influences consumers over time: Online review vs. brand popularity. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 193-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.028
  20. Nordstrom, K., & Vahlne, J. E. (1994). Is the globe shrinking? Psychic distance and the establishment of Swedish sales subsidiaries during the last 100 years. Chapter in International Trade: Regional and global Issues, M. Landeck, ed. United Sates : St. 41-56.
  21. O'grady, S., & Lane, H.W. (1996). The psychic distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2), 309-33. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490137
  22. Rosado-Serrano, A., Paul, J., & Dikova, D. (2018). International franchising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 85, 238-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049
  23. Ryu, G. S., Park, J. C., & Park, C. S. (2006). Consumer responses toward hit product awards: The moderating role of product knowledge and brand strength. Korean Journal of Marketing, 21(1), 57-80.
  24. Safari, A., & Chetty, S. (2019). Multilevel psychic distance and its impact on SME internationalization. International Business Review, 28(4), 754-765 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.03.001
  25. Sousa, C. M. P., & Bradley, F. (2006). Cultural distance and psychic distance: two peas in a pod? Journal of International Marketing, 14(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.14.1.49
  26. Tucker, C., & Zhang, J. (2011). How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Science, 57(5), 828-842. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1312