DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Customers' Psychological Power on Service Expectation and Response to Service Failure in a Restaurant Context

  • Received : 2020.08.03
  • Accepted : 2020.08.30
  • Published : 2020.09.10

Abstract

Purpose: The old axion to put the customers first (e.g., customers are king, customers are always right) has been taken for granted in the service sector. In addition, many companies in South Korea are providing customer-first education for employees at their contact points to strengthen their competitiveness. However, excessive increase in the psychological power of the customer can lead to a problem of abuse of power, called 'Gap-jil.' Despite these concerns, most companies hardly discard policies to give high priority to customers because of the assumption that it enhances customer satisfaction leading to organizational performance. However, in recent years, some franchise catering companies have posted warnings about the abuse of power by customers, and a movement to pursue a power-balancing between service providers and their customers is spreading. Research design, data, and methodology: This research is conducted to reconsider the principle of the customer-first perspective and to create a basis for arguments that can solve the problem of abuse of power, which is recognized as a serious social problem. In this research, we test and analyze the effect of customers' psychological power in the context of a restaurant on expectation for service and response to service failure. Result: The result of an experimental study shows that the effect of psychological power on customer satisfaction can be somewhat negative. Also, customers with high psychological power are more likely to have high service expectations. Especially high psychological power of customers causes a difference in the expectation level of human factors such as employee attitude, while the difference in expectations of non-human factors such as restaurant atmosphere was not statistically significant. In addition, when customers with high psychological power encounter service failure situation, they are more likely to feel disappointment and regret with a service provider. Meanwhile, the effect of psychological power on complaining behaviors are not significant. Conclusions: The findings of this research provide meaningful implications that the service providers should reconsider their existing corporate culture and management policies that put customers first. In addition, the result of this research is provided meaningful opportunities to review the management philosophy for the company's customers and the education philosophy for the employee education.

Keywords

References

  1. Andaleeb, S. S. & Conway, C. (2006). Customer satisfaction in the restaurant industry: An examination of the transaction-specific model. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(1), 3-11 https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610646536
  2. Au, A. & Tse, A. (2019). Expectancy disconfirmation: Effects of deviation from expected delay duration on service evaluation in the airline industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(1), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2018-0219
  3. Bougie, R, Pieters, R, & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Angry customers don't come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303254412
  4. Chang, J., Khan, M., & Tsai, C. (2012). Dining occasions, service failures and customer complaint behaviours: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Tourism Research, 14(6), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.874
  5. Choi Soon-Hwa. (2016). Effects of customer relationship quality, customer perceived power, and brand reputation on complaint behaviors. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(9), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.14.9.201609.111
  6. Choi, W. J., Park, J., & Yoon, H. (2018). Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers' gift preferences. Journal of Business Research, 91, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.033
  7. Cuddy, A. J. C., Schultz, S. J., & Fosse, N. E. (2018). P-Curving a more comprehensive body of research on postural feedback reveals clear evidential value for power-posing effects: Reply to Simmons and Simonsohn (2017). Psychological Science, 29(4), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617746749
  8. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450-1466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012633
  9. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068-1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
  10. Goodwin, S.A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S., & Yzerbyt, V. (2000) Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 227-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003003001
  11. Hashimoto, T., & Karasawa, K. (2018). Impact of consumer power on consumers' reactions to corporate transgression. PloS One, 13(5), 1-14.
  12. He, Y., Li, W., & Lai, K. (2011). Service climate, employee commitment and customer satisfaction: Evidence from the hospitality industry in China. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(5), 592-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111111143359
  13. Hur, W., Han, S., Yoo, J., & Moon, T. W. (2015). The moderating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between emotional labor and job-related outcomes. Management Decision, 53(3), 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2013-0379
  14. Jun, I., Kim, K.I., & Rowley, C. (2019). Organizational culture and the tolerance of corruption: The case of South Korea, Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(4), 534-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2019.1589728
  15. Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐ reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628
  16. Min, D., & Kim, J. (2013). Is power powerful? power, confidence, and goal pursuit. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.12.001
  17. Min, H., Joireman, J., & Kim, H. J. (2019). Understanding why anger predicts intention to complain among high but not low power customers: A test of competing models. Journal of Business Research, 95, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.017
  18. Min Dongwon, Kim Ji-Hern. (2012). The effect of psychological power on stereotyping of brand extended product. Korean Journal of Advertising, 23(7), 35-60.
  19. Moon, T. W., Hur, W. & Jun, J. (2013). The role of perceived organizational support on emotional labor in the airline industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111311290246
  20. Piff, P., Stancato, D., Cote, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. PNAS March 13, 109 (11) 4086-4091 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118373109
  21. Sembada, A., Tsarenko, Y., & Tojib, D. (2016). The positive effects of customers' power on their behavioral responses after service failure. Journal of Service Research, 19(3), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516645188
  22. Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Finkenauer, C., Gundemir, S., & Stamkou, E. (2011). Breaking the rules to rise to power: How norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611398416