DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Empirical Analysis of Trade Support System and Export Performance in Korean SMEs

  • 투고 : 2020.02.23
  • 심사 : 2020.03.31
  • 발행 : 2020.03.30

초록

Purpose - This study investigates factors that affected the utilization of trade support policies and further analyzed how the utilization of trade support policies affected export performance. Research design, data, and methodology - With a sample of 223 small and medium-sized export firms from South Korea, this study examines the determinants of the utilization level of trade support system such as export market orientation, learning orientation, network capability and environmental uncertainty by regression analysis. Results - Export market orientation have a positive effect on the utilization of the trade support system and there is positive relationship between learning orientation and the utilization of trade support system. And network capabilities have had a positive impact on the utilization of the trade support system but there is no relationship between environmental uncertainty and the utilization of trade support system. The utilization of the trade support system had a positive effect on export performance. Conclusions - The internal and external factors of the organization have affected small and medium-sized export firms use of trade support systems. The utilization of trade support system can enhance positive export performance by providing valuable information and resource to external knowledge and also to complementary resources from the external partners.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andersen, O., & Kheam, L. S. (1998). Resource-based theory and international growth strategies: an exploratory study. International Business Review, 7(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(98)00004-3
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  3. Burpitt, W. J., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Export decision-making in small firms: the role of organizational learning. Journal of World Business, 33(1), 1-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(98)80001-1
  4. Cadogan, J., Paul, N., Salminen, R., Puumalainen, K., & Sunqvist, S. (2001). Key antecedents to 'export market-oriented behaviors: a cross-national empirical examination. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(3), 261-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00038-6
  5. Cadogan, J. W., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1995). Narver and Slater, Kohli and Jaworski and the market orientation construct: integration and internationalization. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 3(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652549500000003
  6. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y.(2002). Learning orientation, firm Innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
  7. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R. & Carland, J. A. C.(1984). differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277721
  8. Cavusgil, S. Tamer (1984). Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(84)90006-7
  9. Chatterjee, S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1991). The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (1), pp.33-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120104
  10. Chung, S., & Grupp, H. (1993). Technology Policy and Its Evaluation: A German Case for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise and Some Implications to the Case of Korea. Korean Small Business Review, 15(1), pp.165-205.
  11. Codogan, J. W., Diamantopoulos, A., Morgan, R. E., & Story, V. M, (2006). Factors facilitating and impeding the development of export market-oriented behavior: A study of Hong Kong manufacturing exports. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(1), 634-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.014
  12. Codogan, J. W., Diamantopoulos, A., & Mortanges, C. P. (1999). A measure of export market orientation: scale development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4), 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490834
  13. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
  14. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2010). The influence of organization structure on the utility Of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00033.x
  15. Daft, R. L., Sormunent, J., & Parks, D. (1988). Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: an empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090204
  16. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00037-9
  17. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251915
  18. Deshpande, R., & Farley, J. (1998). Measuring market orientation: a generalization and synthesis. Journal of Market Focused Management, 2(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009719615327
  19. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
  20. Dickson, P. R. (1996). The static and dynamic mechanics of competition: a comment on Hunt and Morgan's comparative advantage theory. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251904
  21. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632
  22. Farrell, M. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of a learning orientation, Marketing Bulletin, 10(1), 38-51.
  23. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/256948
  24. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304
  25. Jung, J. S. (2007). An empirical study on performance of export assistance programs for SMEs in Korea. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Chung-Ang University.
  26. Kim, D. C. (2010). Wine education consumer : how it impacts learning orientation, self-efficacy and satisfaction of education-training. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Sejong University.
  27. Kjell, G., & Lorentzen, T. (1983). Exporting the impact of government export subsidies. European Journal of Marketing, 17(2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004826
  28. Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124-141. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071
  29. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866
  30. Kotabe, M., & Czinkota, M. (1992). State government promotion of manufacturing exports: a gap analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 637-658. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490281
  31. Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797-818. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083085
  32. Lee, J. H. (2015). The effects of authentic leadership of organizational commitment, task performance and creative behavior. Seoul, Korea: Thesis for Doctorate in Sungkyunkwan University.
  33. Lee, J. H., & Park, T. K. (2009). Born global: effects of its international orientation and network on international intensity. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 12(1), 1-21.
  34. Leoidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Piercy, N. F. (1998). Indentifying managerial influences on exporting: past research and future direction. Journal of International Marketing, 6(2), 74-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031x9800600209
  35. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Management of technology and moose on tables. Organization Science, 3(4), 556-558. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.556
  36. Maijoor, S., & Witteloostuijn, A. V. (1996). An empirical test of the resource-based theory: strategic regulation in the Dutch audit industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 549-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199607)17:7<549::AID-SMJ827>3.0.CO;2-R
  37. McNaughton, R. B. (2003). The number of export markets that a firm serves: process models versus the born-global phenomenon. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024114907150
  38. Moini, A. H. (1998). Small firms exporting: how effective are government export assistance programs? Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 1-15.
  39. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757
  40. Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & Maclachlau, D. I. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00086.x
  41. Nerkar, A. and Paruchuri, S. (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: the role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51(5), 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0354
  42. Nonaka, J. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
  43. O Connor, G. C. (2008). Major innovation as a dynamic capability: a system approach. Journal of Product Innovation, 25(4), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x
  44. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193
  45. Racela, O., Chaikittishilpa, C., & Thourmrungroje, A. (2007). Market orientation, international business relationships and perceived export performance. International Marketing Review, 24(2), 144-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330710741794
  46. Sousa, C. M. (2004). Export performance measurement: An evaluation of the empirical research in the literature. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 4(9), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934704323086938
  47. Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003
  48. Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252120
  49. Souchon, A. L., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). A conceptual framework of export market information use: key issues and research propositions. Journal of International Marketing, 8(3), 36-60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.8.3.36.19636
  50. Stanley F. N., & John, C. N. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252250
  51. Street, C. T., & Cameron, A. (2007). External relationship and the small business : a review of small business alliance and network research. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(2), 239-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00211.x
  52. Teece, D. J.(2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  53. Weaver, K. M., Berkowitz, D., & Davies, L. (1998). Increasing the efficiency of national export development programs: the case of Norwegian exporters. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(4), 1-11.
  54. Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W., & Knight, G. (2007). Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42 (3), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.004
  55. Wolkinson, T. J., & Brouthers, L. E. (2006). Trade promotion and SME export performance. International Business Review, 15(3), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.03.001
  56. Yoo, B. H. (2012). An effect of learning orientation on firm performance: focusing on customer orientation and innovativeness. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 25(6), 2809-2826.
  57. Yoo, S. J. (2010). A study on the measures for export promotion of small and medium enterprise in Korea. International Commerce and Information Review, 12(4), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.15798/kaici.12.4.201012.193
  58. Yoon, G. C., & Kim, M. H. (2010). A study on mediating effect of international marketing activity between R&D and network capabilities and performance of Korean INNOBIZs. International Area Studies Review, 14(2), 181-204.
  59. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556420