DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Methods of Implementation for the NRF Open Access Policy

한국연구재단 오픈액세스 정책 실행방안 연구

  • 정경희 (한성대학교 디지털인문정보학트랙) ;
  • 이재윤 (명지대학교 문헌정보학과 교) ;
  • 정은경 (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 최상희 (대구가톨릭대학교 도서관학과)
  • Received : 2020.12.07
  • Accepted : 2020.12.22
  • Published : 2020.12.30

Abstract

This study aims to identify the methods of implementation for the 'National Research Foundation of Korea Open Access 2021(Plan)'. This study covers the methods of implementation in the three following core items: 1) developing the details on the amount, method, and procedures of APC support; 2) proposing methods for facilitating the transition of domestic Korean academic journals to open access journals; and 3) developing methods of entrusting papers to open access repositories. APC support should be guaranteed at a reasonable level. The average or median of APC values for the previous three years will be applied to set the upper limit for support each year. APC support will be provided when the paper is published to open access journals or transitioning journals to open access. Hybrid journals or dual access journals are not included. Support for open access publishing of academic journals in Korea during the transition period will be available for open access journals that have registered for CCL in KJCI or journals that have submitted their application for transitioning to open access. Publishing in hybrid, dual access or subscription-based journals must be accompanied by items related to copyright such as embargo. Research results will be used for the detailed implementation plan of 'NRF OA2021 (Plan)'. They will serve as the base data for the rapid, stable, and sustainable implementation of open access policy in NRF, addressing the Korean domestic academic journal publishing environment and the field of international academic communication.

본 연구는 '한국연구재단 오픈액세스 2021(안)'에 대한 실행방안을 도출하기 위한 것이다. 본 연구는 APC 지원규모와 방법 및 절차, 국내 학술지의 오픈액세스 전환 지원, 오픈액세스 리포지터리에 논문을 기탁하는 방안 등 세 가지 측면에서 실행방안을 제안하였다. 첫째, APC는 합리적인 수준에서 지원되어야 하며 그 상한액을 설정하기 위하여 매년도 이전 3년간 오픈액세스 학술지에 출판한 논문의 APC 평균값이나 중위값을 적용한다. 또한 APC는 오픈액세스 학술지와 오픈액세스전환약정 학술지에 논문을 출판하는 경우 지원하고 하이브리드 학술지나 이중접근 학술지에는 지원하지 않는다. 둘째, 국내 학술지 오픈액세스 출판전환을 위하여 과도기에는 KJCI에 CCL 적용을 등록한 오픈액세스 학술지와 오픈액세스 출판 전환의향서를 제출한 학술지에 대하여 지원사업 신청이 가능하도록 해야 한다. 셋째, 하이브리드 학술지와 이중접근 학술지 및 구독학술지에 출판한 경우 원문기탁과 동시에 엠바고 등 저작권 사항을 보고해야 한다. 본 연구의 결과는 한국연구재단이 국내 학술지 출판환경과 국제적인 학술커뮤니케이션 상황에 부합하는 오픈액세스 정책을 신속하면서도 안정적이고 지속적으로 실행하는데 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, Mikyeong, Min, Yoonkyung, Im, Gwangsup, & Pyo, Soon-Hee (2019). A study on the legal system improvement for open access to publicly funded research papers. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
  2. Cha, Mikyeong, Song, Kyeong-Jin, & Kim, Na-Young (2017). A study on improving laws and regulations for open access of research papers from national research and development projects. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 147-174. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2017.51.1.147
  3. Jang, Won-kyu (2017). A legislative study on the diffusion of open accesses. Sejong: Korea Legislation Research Institute. https//doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201800037643
  4. Kim, So-Young, Kim, Jihyun, Choi, Heeseok, & Hwang, Hyekyong (2016). An analysis on open access policies on publications funded by overseas public institutions. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 209-229. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.209
  5. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2015). Planning on the open platform for global open access infrastructure. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. http://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201600016830
  6. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2016). A study on management of publicly funded research papers based on open science. Daejeon: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. http://doi.org/10.23000/TRKO201700000470
  7. Min, Yoonkyung, & Cha, Mikyeong (2017). A study on the open access policy of scholarly journals publishing research papers funded by Korean government. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 34(1), 155-176. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.1.155
  8. Myongji University Industry and Academia Cooperation Foundation (2017). Development of global scholarly communication platform and online journal publishing system. National Research Foundation of Korea.
  9. Shin, Eun-Ja (2014). A study on APC subsidy policies to encourage OA publishing. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 249-270. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.249
  10. Yoon, Jongsoo, Lee, Eunwoo, Joung, KyoungHee, Kim, Ilkwon, & Choi, Hana (2020). A study on establishing open access policy on NRF. National Research Foundation of Korea.
  11. Eaton, S. E. (2018). Avoiding predatory journals and questionable conferences: A resource guide. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1880/106227. 한국연구재단 역, (2018). 약탈적 학술지와 학회예방가이드. 서울: 한국연구재단.
  12. Eriksson S., & Helgesson G. (2017). The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos, 20(2), 163-170. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
  13. Grudniewicz, A., Moher, D., Cobey, K., Bryson, G., Cukier, S., Allen, K., ... Lalu, M... (2019). Predatory journals: No definition, no defence. Nature, 576, 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
  14. Immenhauser, B. (2019). Funding of platinum open access journals in the social sciences and humanities. Poster for Swiss Open Science Action Plan: Kick-Off Forum, October 17 2019, EPFL. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3450380
  15. Johnson, R., & Fosci, M. (2016). Putting down roots: Securing the future of open access policies. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6269/10/final-KE-Report-V5.1-20JAN2016.pdf
  16. Laakso, M., & Bjork, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 124. http://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-124
  17. Lawson, S. (2015). 'Total cost of ownership' of scholarly communication: Managing subscription and APC payments together. Learned Publishing, 28(1), 9-13. http://doi.org/10.1087/20150103
  18. Morrison, H. (2016), Small scholar-led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future? Learned Publishing, 29(2), 83-88. http://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1015
  19. Openaccess.no (2019). Norwegian open journals in the social sciences and humanities: A consortium for Norwegian SSH OA journals. Retrieved from http://www.openaccess.no/english/humsam/
  20. OpenAIRE (2020). Best Practice Guide for Co-Operative Models of Publishing. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701428
  21. Piwowar H., Priem J., Larivière V., Alperin JP., Matthias L., Norlander B., Farley A., West J., & Haustein S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6:e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
  22. Reckling, F., Rieck, K., & Scherag, E. (2018). Report on the FWF open access journal funding initiative. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1433993
  23. Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2016). The COAPI cats: The current state of open access repository movement and policy documentations. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 6(1), 69-84. http://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2016.6.1.069
  24. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (2018). Aid to scholarly journals. Retrieved from http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/scholarly_journals-revues_savantes-eng.aspx