Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea through a grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2017K1A3A1A19071629, NRF-2020R1I1A2074369) and the Institute of Engineering Research at Seoul National University.
References
- Bettle, M.C., 2014. Validating design methods for sizing submarine Tailfins. In: Proceedings of Warship 2014. Naval Submarines & UUV's, Bath, UK. June 18-19.
- Carrica, P.M., Fu, H., Stern, F., 2011. Computations of self-propulsion free to sink and trim and of motions in head waves of the KRISO Container Ship (KCS) model. Appl. Ocean Res. 33 (4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.07.003
- Castro, A.M., Carrica, P.M., Stern, F., 2011. Full scale self-propulsion computations using discretized propeller for the KRISO container ship KCS. Comput. Fluids 51 (1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.07.005
- Celik, I., Karatekin, O., 1997. Numerical experiments on application of Richardson extrapolation with non-uniform grids. J. Fluid Eng. 119 (3), 584-590. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2819284
- Chen, L.F., Zang, J., Hillis, A.J., Morgan, G.C.J., Plummer, A.R., 2014. "Numerical investigation of waveestructure interaction using OpenFOAM. Ocean Eng. 88, 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.003
- Crook, B., 1990. Resistance for DARPA Suboff as represented by model 5470. In: DTRC Report No. SHD-1298-07. David Taylor Research Center.
- Dubbioso, G., Broglia, R., Zaghi, S., 2017. CFD analysis of turning abilities of a submarine model. Ocean Eng. 129, 459-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.046
- Feldman, J., 1995. Method of Performing Captive-Model Experiments to Predict the Stability and Control Characteristics of Submarines. CRDKNSWC Report No. HD0393-25. Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center.
- Feng, D., Wang, X., Jiang, F., Zhang, Z., 2015. Large eddy simulation of DARPA SUBOFF for Re=2.65×107. J. Coast Res. (73), 687-691.
- Gao, T., Wang, Y., Pang, Y., Chen, Q., Tang, Y., 2018. A time-efficient CFD approach for hydrodynamic coefficient determination and model simplification of submarine. Ocean. Eng. 154, 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.003
- Gertler, M., 1967. The DTMB Planar-Motion-Mechanism System. Naval Ship Research and Development Center. NSRDE Report No. 2523.
- Jasak, H., Vukcevic, V., Gatin, I., Lalovic, I., 2019. CFD validation and grid sensitivity studies of full scale ship self-propulsion. Int. J. Naval Architect. Ocean Eng. 11 (1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.12.004
- Kim, H., Ranmuthugala, D., Leong, Z.Q., Chin, C., 2018. Six-DOF simulations of an underwater vehicle undergoing straight line and steady turning manoeuvres. Ocean Eng. 150, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.048
- Lee, S.K., Cheon, S.J., Joung, T.H., Jang, T.S., Lee, J.H., 2009. Evaluation of the added mass for a spheroid-type UUV by VPMM test. In: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Osaka, Japan, June 21-26.
- Martin, J.E., Michael, T., Carrica, 2015. Submarine maneuvers using direct overset simulation of appendages and propeller and coupled CFD/potential flow propeller solver. J. Ship Res. 59 (1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.2015.59.1.31
- Nouri, N.M., Mostafapour, K., Hassanpour, S.H., 2016. CFD modeling of wing and body of an AUV for estimation of hydrodynamic coefficients. J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 9 (6), 2717-2729. https://doi.org/10.29252/jafm.09.06.25365
- Overpelt, B., Nienhuis, B., Anderson, B., 2015. Free running maneuvering model tests on a modern generic SSK class submarine (BB2). In: Proceedings of Pacific International Maritime Conference, Sydney, Australia, October 6-8.
- Pan, Y.C., Zhang, H.X., Zhou, Q.D., 2012. Numerical prediction of submarine hydrodynamic coefficients using CFD simulation. J. Hydrodyn. 24 (6), 840-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60311-9
- Park, J.Y., Kim, N., Shin, Y.K., 2017. Experimental study on hydrodynamic coefficients for high-incidence-angle maneuver of a submarine. Int. J. Naval Architect. Ocean Eng. 9 (1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.08.003
- Phillips, A.B., Furlong, M., Turnock, S.R., 2007. Virtual planar motion mechanism tests of the autonomous underwater vehicle autosub. In: Proceedings of STG-Conference, Hamburg, Germany, September 26.
- Pontarelli, M., Martin, J.E., Carrica, P.M., 2017. Dynamic instabilities in propeller crashback. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Espoo, Finland, June 12-15.
- Renilson, M., 2015. Submarine Hydrodynamics. Springer, pp. 131-145.
- Sezen, S., Dogrul, A., Delen, C., Bal, S., 2018. Investigation of self-propulsion of DARPA Suboff by RANS method. Ocean Eng. 150, 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.051
- Toxopeus, S.L., 2017. SHWG collaborative exercise: BB2. In: Tech. Report 29347-1-RD, Submarine Hydrodynamic Working Group.
- Tyagi, A., Sen, D., 2006. Calculation of transverse hydrodynamic coefficients using computational fluid dynamic approach. Ocean Eng. 33 (5-6), 798-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.06.004
- Watt, G.D., 2007. Modelling and simulating unsteady six degrees-of-freedom submarine rising maneuvers. In: Defense R&D Canada Atlantic Dartmouth, NS.
Cited by
- Increase in Stability of an X-Configured AUV through Hydrodynamic Design Iterations with the Definition of a New Stability Index to Include Effect of Gravity vol.9, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090942
- Evaluation of Dynamic Characteristics for a Submerged Body with Large Angle of Attack Motion via CFD Analysis vol.35, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.26748/ksoe.2021.063
- Evaluation of Dynamic Characteristics for a Submerged Body with Large Angle of Attack Motion via CFD Analysis vol.35, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.26748/ksoe.2021.063