References
- Arrow, K. (1962) Economic welfare and allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (eds.). The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 609-625.
- Brezis, E.S. (2007) Focal randomisation: an optimal mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects, Science and Public Policy, 34(10), 691-698. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X265394
- Bulathsinhala, N.A. (2015) Ex-ante evaluation of publicly funded R&D projects: Searching for exploration, Science and Public Policy, 42, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu035
- Duch-Brown, N., Garcia-Quevedo, J., and Montolio, D. (2008) Assessing the assignation of public subsidies: Do the experts choose the most efficient R&D projects? World Review of Science Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2).
- Heinze, T. (2008) How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes, Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 302-318. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X317151
- Horrobin, D.F. (1996) Peer review of grant applications: A harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research? The Lancet, 348, 1293-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08029-4
- Hwang, H.S., and Yu. J.C. (1998) R&D project evaluation model based on fuzzy set priority, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 35(3-4), 567-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00160-0
- Johnson, R.A. (1995) Evaluating the viability of on-going product oriented internal research and development projects: Fact or fiction? Computers & Industrial Engineering, 29(1-4), 573-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(95)00136-O
- Klenner, P., Husig, S., and Dowling, M. (2013) Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks - When are markets ready for disruptive innovations? Research Policy, 43, 914-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006
- Klette, T.J., Moen, J., and Griliches, Z. (2000) Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies, Research Policy, 29, 471-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4
- Linton, J.D., Walsh, S., and Morabito, J. (2002) Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio, R&D Management, 32, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00246
- Martin, B. (1997) Peer review as scholarly conformity. In Suppression Stories, B. Martin, 69-83. Wollongong: Fund for Intellectual Dissent.
- Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (MORTHE), Republic of Indonesia (2017) National research master plan (Rencana Induk Riset Nasional) (2017-2045) (in Indonesian).
- Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (MORTHE), Republic of Indonesia (2018) MORTHE Decree 36/2018 on procedures for developing national research priorities and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms for the implementation of national research master plan (in Indonesian).
- Ministry of Research and Technology (2019) Prioritas Riset Nasional 2020-2024 Kebijakan untuk Mendorong Pengembangan dan Pemanfaatan Produksi Dalam Negeri [PowerPoint slides]. (in Indonesian). https://balitbanghub.dephub.go.id/file/138.
- Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (2019a) National research priority (Prioritas Riset Nasional) (2020-2024) (in Indonesian).
- Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (2019b) MORTHE Decree no. 38/2019 on National research priority 2020-2024 (in Indonesian).
- Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (2017) Regulations on the Management, Etc. of National Research and Development Projects. Presidential Decree No. 28210, July 26, 2017.
- Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (2018a) Framework Act on Science and Technology. Act No. 15556, April 17, 2018.
- Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (2018b) Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Science and Technology. Act No. 28800, April 17, 2018.
- Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (2020a) Manual on management of national R&D programs. Sejong: MSIT (in Korean).
- Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (2020b) Notification no. 2020 - 0324. Sejong: MSIT (in Korean).
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea (2020) Notification no. 2020 - 537. Sejong: MOTIE (in Korean).
- Oey-Gardiner, M. (2011) In search of an identity for the DRN. Final Report. Jakarta: Insan Hitawasana Sejahtera: 1-28
- Park, J.M., Lim. S.I., and Seol, S.S. (2017) Measurement of public research outcomes: A technology valuation method, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 6(2), 206-224. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2017.6.2.206
- Park, S.Y., Son, J.K., Seo, J.H., and Seo, J. (2013) Performance evaluation index of TRM: A Korean case for SMEs, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 2(1), 063-096. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2013.2.1.063
- Republic of Indonesia (2002) Law no. 18/2002 on the National systems of research, development and application of science and technology (in Indonesian).
- Republic of Indonesia (2019) Law no. 19/2019 on National system of science and technology (in Indonesian).
- Rigby, J. (2002) Expert panels and peer review. In European Commission, RTD Evaluation Toolbox - Assessing the socio-economic impact of RTD policies, IPTS Technical Report series EUR 20382 EN, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies y Joanneum Research.
- Roper, S., Hewitt-Dundas, N., and Love, J.H. (2004) An ex ante evaluation framework for the regional benefits of publicly supported R&D projects, Research Policy, 33, 487-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.10.002
- Roy, R. (1985) The real defects of peer review and an alternative to it, 10(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398501000309
- Sampurno-Kuffal, F. H. (2011). The Collapse of Indonesia's Strategic Industries. Jakarta: Khazanah Bahari (in Indonesian).
- Setiadarma, E.G. (2018) Understanding the Evidence-Based Policy Making (EBPM) Discourse in the Making of the Master Plan of National Research (RIRN) Indonesia 2017-2045. STI Policy Review, 9(1), 30-54. https://doi.org/10.22675/STIPR.2018. 9.1.030.
- Thee, K. W. (2012). Indonesia's Economy since Independence. Singapore: ISEAS.
- Yim, D.S., Kim, S.S., Ko, Y.J., Kwon, K.S., Lee, E.H.H., Hidayat, D., Indraprahasta, G., Asmara, A. Y., Triyono, B., Akbar, M., Pradana, A., Dinaseviani, A., Purwaningsih, I., Sari, K., Hardiyati, R., Ariyani, L. (forthcoming). Policy Consultation on the Arrangement of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Governance: Coordination Mechanism, Institutional Framework & Financial System and Investment in Indonesia. Sejong: Science and Technology Policy Institute.