니켈티타늄 전동 파일의 기계적 특성 비교: Aurum Blue vs. Aurum Pro

Comparison of mechanical properties of nickel-titanium rotary files: Aurum Blue vs. Aurum Pro

  • 곽상원 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 하정홍 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 안상미 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김현철 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Kwak, Sang Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ha, Jung-Hong (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ahn, Sang Mi (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.09
  • 심사 : 2019.09.30
  • 발행 : 2019.10.31

초록

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the torsional fracture resistances, cyclic fatigue resistance, and bending stiffness of two nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments made of different heat-treated alloy: Aurum Blue (heat-treated) and Aurum Pro (conventional). Methods: Forty-five Aurum Blue and Aurum Pro NiTi files were selected for the three mechanical tests (n=15). For the torsional resistance test, 3 mm file tip was fixed and the shaft was driven clockwise at 2 rpm until fracture occurred by using a customized device. Cyclic fatigue resistance was evaluated by rotating instruments in artificial canal with dynamic mode. Bending stiffness was tested by observation of the bending moment on attaining a 45° bend. The results were analyzed by student-t tests at a significance level of 95%. The fractured surface of each groups were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: Aurum Blue showed significantly higher toughness, ultimate strength, distortion angle, and number of cycles to failure than those of Aurum Pro (p < 0.05). However, Aurum Blue and Aurum Pro did not differ significantly in terms of bending stiffness. SEM showed typical topographic appearances of the cyclic fatigue and torsional fracture. Conclusions: Under the limitations of this study, heat-treated instruments showed higher flexibility and fracture resistances than conventional NiTi instruments.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by Clinical Research Grant, Pusan National University Dental Hospital (2018).

참고문헌

  1. Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000;33:297-310. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00339.x
  2. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
  3. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
  4. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2004;30:722-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129963.42882.C9
  5. Shen Y, Zhou HM, Zheng YF, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2013;39:163-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005
  6. Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Three-dimensional analysis of cutting behavior of nickel-titanium rotary instruments by microcomputed tomography. J Endod 2008;34:606-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.025
  7. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Mechanical properties of ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2016;49:1073-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12557
  8. Yum J, Cheung GS, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Torsional strength and toughness of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2011;37:382-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.028
  9. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, et al. SEM Observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. J Endod 2005;31:40-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000132301.87637.4A
  10. Xu X, Eng M, Zheng Y, Eng D. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. J Endod 2006;32:372-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.012
  11. Park SY, Cheung GS, Yum J, Hur B, Park JK, Kim HC. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2010;36:1200-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.016
  12. Wycoff RC, Berzins DW. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress properties of three different rotary nickel-titanium files with a similar cross-sectional design. J Endod 2012;38:1118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.022
  13. Goo HJ, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Pedulla E, Kim HC. Mechanical properties of various heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2017;43:1872-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.025
  14. Santos Lde A, Bahia MG, de Las Casas EB, Buono VT. Comparison of the mechanical behavior between controlled memory and superelastic nickel-titanium files via finite element analysis. J Endod 2013;39:1444-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.030
  15. Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G, Kafdag O, Balkaya H. Effect of two different temperatures on resistance to cyclic fatigue of one Curve, EdgeFile, HyFlex CM and ProTaper next files. Aust Endod J. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/aej
  16. Rubio J, Zarzosa JI, Pallares A. A comparative study of cyclic fatigue of 10 different types of endodontic instruments: an in vitro study. Acta Stomatol Croat 2019;53:28-36. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc53/1/3
  17. Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schafer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys - a review. Int Endod J 2018;51:1088-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12924
  18. Pedulla E, Plotino G, Grande NM, et al. Shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2227-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1732-4