DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중국기업들의 성과를 위한 연구개발투자와 기업지배구조의 활용방안에 대한 연구

R&D Investment and Corporate Governance Systems for the Performance of Chinese Firms

  • Yoo, Jaewook (College of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.09
  • 심사 : 2019.11.20
  • 발행 : 2019.11.28

초록

본 연구는 중국기업들의 R&D 투자와 성과 간의 관계에 대한 기업지배구조 시스템들의 차별적인 영향을 분석하는데 주된 목적을 두고 실행되었다. 연구표본은 중국 첨단기업들에 대한 통계연보에서 획득하였고, 실증분석을 위해서는 다중회귀분석을 실행하였다. 분석결과에 따르면 중국기업들의 R&D 투자와 성과 간의 유의한 정(+)의 관계는 CEO-이사회 의장직의 분리에 의해 강화되는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 이사회 구성에 대한 사외이사 비율 증가는 R&D 투자와 성과 간의 관계를 약화시키는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 기업지배구조 시스템을 구축하고 R&D투자 관리를 통해 성과 향상을 도모하고 있는 중국 기업들에게 실질적인 활용 지침을 제공하고 있다. 또한 R&D 투자관리 방안으로서 기업지배구조의 영향에 대한 미래 연구를 제안하고 있다.

This study aims to examine the impact of corporate governance systems on the relationship between R&D investment and the performance of Chinese firms. The sample firms were obtained from the statistical yearbook of Chinese high-tech firms. We implement a multiple-regression analysis for an empirical examination. The findings of showed that the separation of the board chair with CEO strengthen the R&D investment-performance relationship of Chinese firms. However, the outsider ratio of the board was found to negatively moderate that relationship. This study provides practical guidelines for Chinese firms undertaking R&D management and corporate governance systems. It also encourages future study on the effects of corporate governance as the means for R&D investment management.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. Gupta. (2019). Capital Structure, Ownership Structure and R&D Investments: Evidence from Indian Firms. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 25(1), 36-59.
  2. A. Alam, M. Uddin & H. Yazdifar. (2019). Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.007
  3. D. Asensio-Lopez, L. Cabeza-Garcia & N. Gonzalez-Alvarez. (2018). Corporate governance and innovation: a theoretical review. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28(3), 266-284.
  4. M. Yin & L. Sheng. (2019). Corporate governance, innovation input and corporate performance: Empirical research based on endogeneity and industry categories. Nankai Business Review International, 10(1), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-10-2018-0057
  5. J. H. Han & K. H. Yeon (2012). The Moderating Effect of Corporate Governance between Management of Ethics and Firm Performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.2.133
  6. M. F. Thraya, J. Lichy, A. Louizi & M. Rzem. (2019). High-tech acquirers and the moderating role of corporate governance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 100354.
  7. Y. Yao & S. Applebaum. (2009). CEO compensation as a process and product of negotiation. Corporate Governance, 9(3), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700910964352
  8. Y. H. Liu, J. I. Kim & J. W. Yoo. (2019). Intangible resources and internationalization for the innovation performance of Chinese high-tech firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 1-17.
  9. E. H. Lee, J. W. Yoo & C. Y. Kim. (2019). Entrepreneurial Orientation of Owner Managers and Innovation Performance of Firms: Focusing on Mediation Effect of User Innovation. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(5), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.5.213
  10. E. F, Fama & M. C. Jensen. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 301-325.
  11. D. I. Kim. (2018). The Impact Analysis of Internal Control System on Accounting Information's Usefulness. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(11), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.11.307
  12. A. Agrawal & S. Chadha. (2005). Corporate governance and accounting scandals. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.1086/430808
  13. E. H. Lee, J. W. Yoo & C. Y. Kim. (2019). Entrepreneurial Orientation of Owner Managers and Innovation Performance of Firms : Focusing on mediation effect of user innovation. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(5), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.5.213
  14. J. W. Yoo & J. I. Kim (2019). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental uncertainty on Korean technology firms' R&D investment. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(2), 1-13.
  15. W. Lazonick & M. O'Sullivan. (2010). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/030851400360541
  16. G. M. Coelho, A. C. F. Galvao, & A. C. Guedes. (2012). Strategic foresight applied to the management plan of an innovation development agency. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.655412
  17. H. B. Shadab. (2009). The law and economics of hedge funds: Financial innovation and investor protection. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 6(2), 1-59.
  18. J. R. Becker-Blease. (2011). Governance and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(4), 947-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.04.003
  19. S. Lhuillery. (2011). The impact of corporate governance practices on R&D efforts: A look at shareholders' rights, cross-listing and control pyramid. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(5), 1475-1513. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr022
  20. S. H. Hussain & C. Mallin. (2003). The dynamics of corporate governance in Bahrain: Structure, responsibilities and operation of corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00322
  21. L. L. Wan & C. L. Qing. (2019). An Empirical Study on the Effect of R&D Investment on Business Performance by Life Cycle: Focus on China's Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME), Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(6), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.043
  22. F. Michael, M. Peter, Y. Fung & M. R, Oliver. (2006). Firm performance, governance structure, and top management turnover in a transitional economy. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1289-1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00621.x
  23. C. Driver & M. J. C. Guedes. (2012). Research and development, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies. Research Policy, 41(9), 1565-1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.003