DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preparation and Properties of Green Environment-Friendly Drilling Polymer Mud

  • Zhang, Feng-Jun (Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University) ;
  • Sun, Xian-Yang (Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University) ;
  • Li, Xuan (Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University) ;
  • Kong, Cui (Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University) ;
  • Liu, Jin (Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Building Materials, Anhui Jianzhu University) ;
  • Chen, Qian-Bao (Anhui Engineering Material CO., LTD of CTCE Group) ;
  • Oh, Won-Chun (Department of Advanced Materials Science & Engineering, Hanseo University)
  • Received : 2018.12.05
  • Accepted : 2019.10.09
  • Published : 2019.11.27

Abstract

In this paper, a water-based green polymer mud is synthesized by simple compounding method. Effects of different kinds of tackifiers, their molecular weight on the viscosity of polymer mud and the effects of different fluid loss additives on mud fluid loss are studied. The results show that when polystyrene and anionic polyacrylamide with molecular weight of 8 ~ 10 million are used as the main thickening ingredient, polymer mud with high viscosity and high stability can be obtained. When the prepared polymer mud is formulated as NPAM: PEO: Hydroxypropyl cellulose(HPC) : Water = 42:10:10:100000 (unit: kg), the viscosity can reach 20.6 s, the filtration loss in 7.5 min is 24 mL, and the sand content is only 0.1 %. Compared with traditional bentonite mud, the green environment-friendly polymer mud has the advantages of small amount of waste, low environmental pollution, and low pulping cost, and can meet the construction needs for most topography and geomorphology drilling engineering.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Amanullah, J. R. Marsden and H. F. Shaw, J. Can. Petrol. Technol., 36, 45 (1997).
  2. L. M. Wenger, C. L. Davis, J. M. Evensen, J. R. Gormlyand and P. J. Mankiewicz, Org. Geochem., 35, 1527 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.07.001
  3. K. Sehly, H. L. Chiew, H. Li, A. Song, Y. K. Leong and W. Huang, Appl. Clay Sci., 104, 309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.013
  4. L. V. Baltoiu, B. K. Warren and T. A. Natros, SPE Drilling Completion, 23, 250 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2118/101231-PA
  5. M. I. Abdou and E. S. Ahmed, Pet. Sci. Technol., 29, 2220 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10916461003663065
  6. S. K. Dewangan and S. L. Sinha, Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res., 44, 195 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.2017015328
  7. K. V. Antonov, Oil. Gas J., 99, 52 (2001).
  8. A. Rabiee, J. Vinyl Addit. Technol., 16, 111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.20229
  9. H. Zhong, Z. Qiu, W. Huang, D. Sun, D. Zhang and J. Cao, Appl. Clay Sci., 114, 359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.018
  10. G. Jiang, X. Zhang, T. Dong, Y. Xuan, L. Wang and Q. Jiang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 135, 45584 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.45584
  11. L. D. S. Cescon, P. Quartarone, S. P. D. S. Ribeiro and R. S. V. Nascimento, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 135, 46621 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.46621
  12. O. Griot and J. A. Kitchener, Trans. Faraday Soc., 61, 1026 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9656101026
  13. J. Rubio and J. A. Kitchener, J. Colloid. Interface. Sci., 57, 132 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(76)90182-X
  14. J. Gregory and S. Barany, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 169, 1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.06.004
  15. S. M. R. Shaikh, M. S. Nasser, I. Hussein, A. Benamor, S. A. Onaizi and H. Qiblawey, Sep. Purif. Technol., 187, 137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.050