DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predictors of midpalatal suture expansion by miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: A preliminary study

  • Shin, Hyerin (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hwang, Chung-Ju (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Kee-Joon (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Yoon Jeong (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Sang-Sun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yu, Hyung Seog (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2019.04.10
  • Accepted : 2019.07.26
  • Published : 2019.11.25

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine the predictors of midpalatal suture expansion by miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in young adults. Methods: The following variables were selected as possible predictors: chronological age, palate length and depth, midpalatal suture maturation (MPSM) stage, midpalatal suture density (MPSD) ratio, the sella-nasion (SN)-mandibular plane (MP) angle as an indicator of the vertical skeletal pattern, and the point A-nasion-point B (ANB) angle for anteroposterior skeletal classification. For 31 patients (mean age, 22.52 years) who underwent MARPE treatment, palate length and depth, MPSM stage and MPSD ratio from the initial cone-beam computed tomography images, and the SN-MP angle and ANB angle from lateral cephalograms were assessed. The midpalatal suture opening ratio was calculated from the midpalatal suture opening width measured in periapical radiographs and the MARPE screw expansion. Statistical analyses of correlations were performed for the entire patient group of 31 subjects and subgroups categorized by sex, vertical skeletal pattern, and anteroposterior skeletal classification. Results: In the entire patient group, the midpalatal suture opening ratio showed statistically significant negative correlations with age, palate length, and MPSM stage (r = -0.506, -0.494, and -0.746, respectively, all p < 0.01). In subgroup analyses, a strong negative correlation was observed with the palate depth in the skeletal Class II subgroup (r = -0.900, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The findings of this study indicated that age, palate length, and MPSM stage can be predictors of midpalatal suture expansion by MARPE in young adults.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee KJ, Park YC, Park JY, Hwang WS. Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:830-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.065
  2. Park JJ, Park YC, Lee KJ, Cha JY, Tahk JH, Choi YJ. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after miniscrewassisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:77-86. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.77
  3. Jain V, Shyagali TR, Kambalyal P, Rajpara Y, Doshi J. Comparison and evaluation of stresses generated by rapid maxillary expansion and the implant-supported rapid maxillary expansion on the craniofacial structures using finite element method of stress analysis. Prog Orthod 2017;18:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0157-6
  4. Handelman CS, Wang L, BeGole EA, Haas AJ. Nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion in adults: report on 47 cases using the Haas expander. Angle Orthod 2000;70:129-44.
  5. Iseri H, Ozsoy S. Semirapid maxillary expansion--a study of long-term transverse effects in older adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod 2004;74:71-8.
  6. Cunha ACD, Lee H, Nojima LI, Nojima MDCG, Lee KJ. Miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion for managing arch perimeter in an adult patient. Dental Press J Orthod 2017;22:97-108.
  7. Gautam P, Valiathan A, Adhikari R. Stress and displacement patterns in the craniofacial skeleton with rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element method study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:5.e1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.044
  8. Priyadarshini J, Mahesh CM, Chandrashekar BS, Sundara A, Arun AV, Reddy VP. Stress and displacement patterns in the craniofacial skeleton with rapid maxillary expansion-a finite element method study. Prog Orthod 2017;18:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0172-2
  9. Knaup B, Yildizhan F, Wehrbein H. Age-related changes in the midpalatal suture. A histomorphometric study. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:467-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-004-0415-y
  10. Wehrbein H, Yildizhan F. The mid-palatal suture in young adults. A radiological-histological investigation. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:105-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.2.105
  11. Kokich VG. Age changes in the human frontozygomatic suture from 20 to 95 years. Am J Orthod 1976;69:411-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90209-8
  12. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90202-2
  13. Mossaz CF, Byloff FK, Richter M. Unilateral and bilateral corticotomies for correction of maxillary transverse discrepancies. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:110-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.2.110
  14. Timms DJ, Vero D. The relationship of rapid maxillary expansion to surgery with special reference to midpalatal synostosis. Br J Oral Surg 1981;19:180-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-117X(81)90003-2
  15. Korbmacher H, Schilling A, Puschel K, Amling M, Kahl-Nieke B. Age-dependent three-dimensional microcomputed tomography analysis of the human midpalatal suture. J Orofac Orthop 2007;68:364-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-007-0729-7
  16. Matsuyama Y, Motoyoshi M, Tsurumachi N, Shimizu N. Effects of palate depth, modified arm shape, and anchor screw on rapid maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:188-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju033
  17. Parcha E, Bitsanis E, Halazonetis DJ. Morphometric covariation between palatal shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthod 2017;39:377-85.
  18. Forster CM, Sunga E, Chung CH. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:288-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm113
  19. Franchi L, Baccetti T. Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on postero-anterior films. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005;8:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00312.x
  20. Angelieri F, Cevidanes LH, Franchi L, Goncalves JR, Benavides E, McNamara JA Jr. Midpalatal suture maturation: classification method for individual assessment before rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:759-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.022
  21. Grunheid T, Larson CE, Larson BE. Midpalatal suture density ratio: a novel predictor of skeletal response to rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:267-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.043
  22. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22:142-5.
  23. Schudy FF. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1965;35:36-50.
  24. Persson M, Thilander B. Palatal suture closure in man from 15 to 35 years of age. Am J Orthod 1977;72:42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90123-3
  25. Melsen B, Melsen F. The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am J Orthod 1982;82:329-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90467-5
  26. Ladewig VM, Capelozza-Filho L, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Guedes FP, de Almeida Cardoso M, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC. Tomographic evaluation of the maturation stage of the midpalatal suture in postadolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:818-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.09.019
  27. Barbosa NMV, Castro AC, Conti F, Capelozza-Filho L, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA. Reliability and reproducibility of the method of assessment of midpalatal suture maturation: a tomographic study. Angle Orthod 2019;89:71-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/121317-859.1
  28. Isaacson RJ, Wood JL, Ingram AH. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod 1964;34:256-60.
  29. Isaacson RJ, Ingram AH. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod 1964;34:261-70.
  30. Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Muller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25:1468-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.141

Cited by

  1. Stability of bimaxillary surgery involving intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with or without presurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclus vol.50, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.304
  2. T cells participate in bone remodeling during the rapid palatal expansion vol.34, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202001078r
  3. Evaluation of factors related to the success of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion vol.91, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2319/051420-436.1
  4. Would midpalatal suture characteristics help to predict the success rate of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion? vol.160, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.035
  5. Success and complication rate of miniscrew assisted non-surgical palatal expansion in adults - a consecutive study using a novel force-controlled polycyclic activation protocol vol.17, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00301-2