Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Urban Regeneration Priority Regions Project Using Quantitative Evaluation Indicators - In Case study of Cheonan Priority Regions -

정량적 평가지표를 활용한 도시재생 선도지역 사업효과 분석 - 천안시 선도지역을 사례로 -

  • Received : 2019.04.19
  • Accepted : 2019.10.11
  • Published : 2019.10.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to confirm, through quantitative indices, changes arising with the implementation of urban regeneration projects, with a specific focus on the case of Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, one of the 13 priority rgions in urban regeneration. By utilizing quantitative data including resident population, floating population, revenue, number of small business persons, number of startup companies, and number of licensed buildings, the study confirmed changes in Dongnam-gu and other urban regeneration areas. The study compared monitoring results and implemented project policies to confirm changes within the area as a result of project implementation. Additionally, resident perception toward business districts was surveyed to confirm changes in perception and opinion, and monitoring indices were used to confirm changes as a result of project implementation. Accordingly, the study presented a plan to carry out the assessment of urban regeneration projects, which can be employed as data for conducting future urban regeneration projects. Urban regeneration projects are carried out for the long-term. Therefore, based on monitoring and investigative data, they require constant policy suggestions and periodic monitoring in accordance with changes resulting from project implementation. With regards to the effective range of urban regeneration projects, the study confirmed the possibility of an effect not only in the area of project implementation but also in surrounding areas. However, because the study merely confirms changes in Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, additional research is necessary to ascertain assessment plans suitable to the different types and regional characteristics of urban regeneration projects.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y., & Seong, N. (2008). A Study on the Derivation of Valuation Factor in Urban Regeneration Plan, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 19(5), 37-46.
  2. Choi, J., & Choi, C. (2011). A Study on establishment of urban regeneration project models and evaluation indexes, Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture, 13(3), 53-60.
  3. Choi, M., Choi, J., & Yang, D. (2013). The Study on Elaboration and Applications of the Urban Regeneration Monitoring Indicators-Based on ForeignCases-, Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment, 13(3), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2013.13.3.051
  4. Joo, H., & Lee, S. (2018). The Evaluation Measures for Urban Regeneration Monitoring with the Use of Big Data - For the 13 Cities in the Urban Regeneration Priority Regions -, Journal of Real Estate Policy Research, 19(3), 17-38.
  5. Jung, K., Jeon, H., Jeong, Y., & Lee, S. (2017). A Study on the Application Methods of Indicators for Monitoring Urban Regeneration Projects - Focused on Urban Regeneration Priority Regions -, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 52(3), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2017.06.52.3.55
  6. Kim, R., Lee, J., & Lee, S. (2015). A Study on the Monitoring and Evaluation of Priority Projects for Urban Regeneration, LHI Journal 6(1), 1-9.
  7. Lee, J. et al. (2003). Methods and Strategies for Constructing Land Use Monitoring, Anyang, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  8. Lee, S. (2018). A Study on the Project Promotion Monitoring and Information Utilization in Leading Urban Regeneration Area, Daejeon, Land & Housing Institute.
  9. Park, D., Jeong, D., & Kim, H. (2010). Assessment of the Downtown Regeneration Project Based on the Analysis of Planning Factors, Journal of Korea Urban Management Association, 22(3), 295-316.
  10. Yu, J. et al. (2010). Japan's national land monitoring and indicator system, KRIHS POLICY BRIEF, 261, 1-8.