DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Appropriation of Human Resources into Human Assets and Its Typology

인적자원의 인적자산화 과정과 자산유형

  • Jeong, Kioh (Graduate School of Education Policy, Korea National University of Education)
  • 정기오 (한국교원대 교육정책전문대학원)
  • Received : 2019.04.29
  • Accepted : 2019.06.24
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Appropriation means the process of transforming resources to property. John Locke earlier investigated the appropriation process of natural resources into the land property, which grounded the jurisprudential base of the private ownership of the land. In the same way human resources are transformed into the human assets. Appropriation process, very rarely studied so far, in this case of human property is the focus of this paper. The appropriation of intangible property is by far easier than the appropriation of tangible property. Learning is a process of embodiment, which naturally mean the process of appropriation. For the material resources which exist out of human body, appropriation necessary need special philosophical and institutional justification. In the process appropriation for intangibles, investigator found, appropriator and learner either can be same, or can be differentiated. In the former case substantial human assets are created while in the latter relational human assets are built. After the discussion of appropriation process, Investigator proceeds to the problem of visualizing the invisibles. Evaluation and assessment issue were discussed in this perspective. Qualification system is particularly noted as a system to regulate substantial human assets including their issuing and registration. The work done in this paper would contribute in understanding the law of education and the law of qualification.

서비스가 과정이라면 지식과 역량 등 인적자본은 그 실체이다. 일반적으로 자원은 공유된다. 이 자원이 시장경제의 원동력이 되는 기업 활동의 토대인 자본(capital)이 되려면 그 이전에 자산화 되어야 한다. 자원이 자산화 되는 과정에서 사유화(appropriation) 현상이 일어난다. 일찍이 존 로크는 바로 이 과정에서 개인의 인격과 자유에 기초한 사유재산권의 법철학적 기초를 찾았다. 인적자원(human resources) 또한 이러한 사유화 과정을 거쳐 인적자산(human assets)으로 전화된다. 오늘날 서비스경제 서비스경영에 대한 논의에서 일종의 블랙박스처럼 남아 있는 부분이 무형의 자원, 자산, 자본의 구별과 그 실체에 관한 탐구이다. 이 논문은 인적자원이 인적자산화 되는 과정을 연구한다. 우선 인적자원이 학습에 의하여 형성됨을 밝히고 이렇게 형성되는 인적자원이 인적자산화 되는 과정이 바로 사유화(appropriation)임을 밝힌다. 특히 서비스경제하에서 지식과 학습의 개념이 확대되면서 전통적인 왜(why)와 어떻게(how)에 관한 지식과 학습 이외에 누가 무엇을 언제 어디서에 관한 학습과 지식이 광범하게 경제적 자원 즉 공유자원으로 남겨지고 있으며 이를 사유화(appropriate)하는 과정이 지식경제 서비스경제에서 광범하게 진전되고 있음을 지적하였다. 이렇게 해서 인적자원이 인적자산화 되는 것이다. 이어 연구자는 학습행위와 사유화 행위의 주체가 일치하는 경우 불일치하는 경우를 나누어 검토하고 그에 따라 인적자산의 형태가 실체적 인적자산과 관계적 인적자산으로 나누어짐을 분석한다. 더 나아가 학력 학위를 포함한 자격법제와 무체재산법제가 실체적 관계적 인적자산을 유형화하고 공시하는 기능을 수행함을 밝힌다. 이러한 작업은 그동안 이론적으로 정립되지 못해온 지식경제 서비스경제의 토대를 이루는 무형자산법제의 실질을 밝히고 더 나아가 교육학습법제와 자격법제 및 무체재산권법제 간의 차이와 상호관계를 체계적으로 이해하고 관련 제도의 발전을 위한 토대가 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, Paul S, (2004), From Labor Process To Activity Theory, in P. Sawchuk, M. Elhammoumi, and N. Duarte, eds.(2004) Critical Perspectives on Activity Theory, Education and Work: An International Collection. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Ellerman, David, (2014), On Property Theory, University of California at Riverside, manuscript to the Journal of Economic Issues (Sept. 2014).
  3. Engestrom, Y, (2007), Putting Vygotsky to work: The Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation, in H, Daniels, M, Cole and J, V, Wertsch eds, The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, Cambridge University Press.
  4. Hidalgo, Desiree, (2013), Ownership and private property from the perspectives of Hegel and Marx, The Agora: Political Science Undergraduate Journal Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 139-147. https://doi.org/10.29173/agora19895
  5. Hunter, Laurie, (2002), Intellectual Capital: Accumulation and Appropriation, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No, 22/02.
  6. Jeong, Kioh, (2015), Basic Concepts and Frame of National HRD Policy, Korean Education Policy Studies Vol.2, pp. 1-32
  7. Jeong, Kioh, (2006), Educational Test and Democracy, KSI
  8. Jonathan, Nitzan, (1998), Differential accumulation: towards a new political economy of capital, Review of International Political Economy Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 169-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347543
  9. Kim, Hyungkee, (2006), The Knowledge - Led Accumulation Regime: A Theory of Contemporary Capitalism, paper Presented to the French-Korean Regulationist Workshop, University of Paris 13.
  10. Kim, Jeongchu, l(2016), Locke's Property and Person: What ontological implications does Locke's notion of property have? Korean Political Science Review Vol.50, No.4, Sept. 2016, pp.25-50. https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2016.50.4.002
  11. Kogelmann, Brian and Benjamin G, Ogden, (2016), Enough and as Good: a Formal Model of Lockean First Appropriation, Unpublished paper.
  12. Kuak, Younjik and Kim Jaehyung, (2015), Property Law, Parkyoung Press
  13. Lusch, R. F. and S. L. Vargo eds, (2006), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, M,E, Sharpe.
  14. Oded, Galor and Omer Moav, (1999), From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development, a seminar paper at the EEA meetings Crisis, Inequality, and Growth, Aix.
  15. Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards, (1923), The Meaning of Meaning, Harcout Brace & World Inc, New York
  16. OECD, (1994), Assessing and Certifying Occupational Skills and Competencies in Vocational Education and Training, Paris, OECD.
  17. Thorpe, Vicki, (2015), Assessing Complexity: Group Composing and Newzealand's National Certificates of Educational Achievement, Doctoral Thesis 2015 at Victoria University of Wellington.
  18. Ryan, Paul, (1993), Adult Learning and Work: Finance, Incentives and Certification in What Makes Workers Learn: The Role of Incentives in Workplace Education and Training, Philadelphia, National Center on Adult Literacy.
  19. Spohrer, J,, Maglio, P, P,, Bailey, J,, & Gruhl, D, (2007), Steps toward a science of service systems, IEEE Computer, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 71-77 https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.61
  20. Unesco, (1996), Learning: the Treasure Within, Paris, Unesco.
  21. Widerquist, Karl, (2010), Lockean Theories of Property: Justifications for Unilateral Appropriation, Public Reason Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 3-26.